Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T00:08:18.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defects in GaP film grown on Si(211) by molecular beam epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2016

Don W. Chung ,
M. Inada  and
H. Kroemer
Don W. Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, San Jose State University, Washington Square, San Jose, California 95192
M. Inada
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
H. Kroemer
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106
Get access

Abstract

Galium phosphorus films grown on (211 )Si by molecular beam epitaxy have been investigated using a transmission electron microscope. The main defects observed in the alloy were of misfit dislocations, stacking faults, and microtwins. The misfit dislocations are of the 60° type with Burgers vectors of a/2 ‹110›, and the stacking faults are intrinsic in nature and bounded by Shockley partials and stair-rod partial dislocations. The habit planes of these defect structures were found to depend solely on the crystalline growth orientation with respect to the substrate orientation. A possible mechanism of the formation and growth of these misfit defects has been proposed for the present growth orientation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 1 , Issue 6 , December 1986 , pp. 803 - 810
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Chung, D. W., Scr. Metall. 19, 817 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Morizane, K., J. Cryst. Growth 38, 249 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Neave, J. H., Laser, P. K., Joyce, B. A., Gowers, J. P., and Van der Veen, J. F., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1, 688 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Chung, D. W., Materials Research Society Spring Meeting, San Francisco, California, 15–18 April 1985.Google Scholar
5Chung, D. W., Mater. Res. pull, (to be published).Google Scholar
6Wright, S. L., Inada, M., and Kroemer, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 21, 534 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Wright, S. L. and Kroemer, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20, 143 (1982).Google Scholar
8Howie, A. and Whelan, M. J., Proc. R. Soc. London A 207, 206 (1962).Google Scholar
9Addamiano, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 1537 (1960).Google Scholar
10Giesecke, G. and Pfister, H., Acta Crystaliogr. 11, 369 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Shaw, N. and Liu, Y. H., Acta Phys. Sin. Abstr. 20, 699 (1964).Google Scholar
12Hornstra, J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 5, 129 (1958).Google Scholar
13Silcock, J. M. and Tunstall, W. J., Philos. Mag. 10, 361 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Holt, D. B., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23, 1353 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Gevers, R., Art, A., and Amelinckx, S., Phys. Status Solidi 3, 1563 (19.63).Google Scholar
16Whelan, M. J. and Hirsch, P. B., Philos. Mag. 2, 1303 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar