Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T15:17:54.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decomposition of YBa2Cu3O7−x during annealing in CO2/O2 mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Y. Gao
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Science and Technology Center for Superconductivity, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
K. L. Merkle
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Science and Technology Center for Superconductivity, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
C. Zhang
Affiliation:
Materials and Components Technology Division, Science and Technology Center for Superconductivity, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
U. Balachandran
Affiliation:
Materials and Components Technology Division, Science and Technology Center for Superconductivity, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
R. B. Poeppel
Affiliation:
Materials and Components Technology Division, Science and Technology Center for Superconductivity, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Get access

Abstract

The stability of YBa2Cu3O7−x superconductors toward reactions with CO2 in CO2/O2 gas mixtures has been studied during annealing at temperatures ranging from 600°C to 950°C. The results show that there are three different types of the reactions. The reaction products of these reactions all include BaCO3 and CuO, while the third product is dependent on the annealing temperature. At 600°C, YBa-carbonates were formed while Y2Cu2O5 and Y2BaCuO5 were formed at 815°C and 950°C, respectively. Transmission Electron Microscopy images show that the reactions started at grain boundaries with the formation of island-type precipitates.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Jahan, M. S., Cooke, D.W., Sheinberg, H., Smith, J. L., and Lianos, D. P., J. Mater. Res. 4 (4), 759 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Gallagher, P. K., Grader, G. S., and O'Bryan, H. M., Mater. Res. Bull. 23, 1491 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Fjellvag, H., Karen, P., Kjekshus, A., Kofstad, P., and Norby, T., Acta Chem. Scand. A42, 178 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Zhang, L., Chen, J., Chan, H., and Harmer, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1997 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Arjomand, M. and Machin, D. J., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton, 1061 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Kale, G. M. and Jacob, K.T., J. Chem. of Mater. 1, 515 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Roth, R. S., Dennis, J. R., and Davis, K. C., Advan. Ceram. Mater. 2, 303 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8DeLeeuw, D. M., Mutsaers, C. A. H. A., Langreis, C., Smoorenburg, H.C.A., and Rommers, P. J., Physica C 152, 39 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Negas, T. and Roth, R. S. (Proc. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.) (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1972), p. 233.Google Scholar