Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:34:04.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cracking in Ceramic/metal/polymer Trilayer Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Hong Zhao
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–8500
Pedro Miranda
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–8500
Brian R. Lawn
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–8500
Xiaozhi Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia
Get access

Extract

Fracture and deformation in model brittle-outerlayer/metal-core/polymer-substrate trilayer systems in concentrated loading are studied. Model systems for experimental study are fabricated from glass microscope slides glued with epoxy adhesive onto steel and aluminum sheets, and the resulting laminates glued onto polycarbonate substrate bases. Critical loads to initiate two basic fracture modes in the glass layers—cone cracks at the top surfaces and radial cracks at the undersurfaces—are measured as a function of metal thickness by in situ observation through the glass side walls. Finite element modeling (FEM) is used to quantify these competing fracture modes. The more damaging radial fracture mode is attributed to flexure of the glass layers on soft underlayers. Although much of this flexure can be eliminated by removing the soft adhesive interlayer between glass and metal, yield in the metal limits the potential increases in critical load for radial cracking. Trilayer systems consisting of porcelain fused to Co-, Pd- and Au-alloy core support layers relevant to dental crowns are then analyzed by FEM. The hardness (especially) and elastic modulus of the metal are identified as the primary controlling material parameters, with modulus and strength of the brittle layer as supplemental parameters. Guidelines for improving metal-based crownlike layer structures are thereby developed via optimization of metal properties and relative layer thicknesses.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kelly, J.R., J. Prosthet. Dent. 81, 652 (1999).Google Scholar
2.Peterson, I.M., Pajares, A., Lawn, B.R., Thompson, V.P., and Rekow, E.D., J. Dent. Res. 77, 589 (1998).Google Scholar
3.Zhao, H., Hu, X.Z., Bush, M.B., and Lawn, B.R., J. Mater. Res. 15, 676 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Zhao, H., Hu, X., Bush, M.B., and Lawn, B.R., J. Mater. Res. 16, 1471 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Eberhardt, A.W., Lewis, J.L., and Keer, L.M., ASME J. Biomed. Eng. 113, 410 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Willmann, G., Adv. Eng. Mech. 3, 135 (2001).Google Scholar
7.Kelly, J.R., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 27, 443 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chai, H., Lawn, B.R., and Wuttiphan, S., J. Mater. Res. 14, 3805 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Chai, H. and Lawn, B.R., J. Mater. Res. 15, 1017 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Cai, H., Kalceff, M.A. Stevens, and Lawn, B.R., J. Mater. Res. 9, 762 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Xu, H.H.K., Smith, D.T., Jahanmir, S., Romberg, E., Kelley, J.R., and Thompson, V.P., J. Dent. Res. 77, 472 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Miranda, P., Pajares, A., Guiberteau, F., Cumbrera, F.L., and Lawn, B.R., J. Mater. Res. 16, 115 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Fischer-Cripps, A.C. and Lawn, B.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2609 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Fischer-Cripps, A.C., Lawn, B.R., Pajares, A., and Wei, L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2619 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lawn, B.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1977 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Tabor, D., Hardness of Metals (Clarendon, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1951).Google Scholar
17.Rhee, Y-W., Kim, H-W., Deng, Y., and Lawn, B.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 561 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Rhee, Y-W., Kim, H-W., Deng, Y., and Lawn, B.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 1066 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Suresh, S., Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1991).Google Scholar