Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:40:03.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of (hexafluoroacetylacetonate)Cu(vinyltrimethylsilane) and (hexafluoroacetylacetonate)Cu(allyltrimethylsilane) for metalorganic chemical vapor deposition of copper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Man-Young Park ,
Jong-Hoon Son ,
Sang-Woo Kang  and
Shi-Woo Rhee
Man-Young Park
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing (LAMP), Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, 790-784, Korea
Jong-Hoon Son
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing (LAMP), Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, 790-784, Korea
Sang-Woo Kang
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing (LAMP), Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, 790-784, Korea
Shi-Woo Rhee*
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing (LAMP), Department of Chemical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, 790-784, Korea
*
a)[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

For the metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) of copper, (hfac)Cu(VTMS) (hfac = hexafluoroacetylacetonate, VTMS = vinyltrimethylsilane) and (hfac)Cu(ATMS) (ATMS = allyltrimethylsilane) were compared, and the effect of L ligand in (hfac)Cu–L was examined. It was found by 1H-NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) that the thermal stability of (hfac)Cu(VTMS) was better than that of (hfac)Cu(ATMS) due to the relatively weak Cu–ATMS bond. From in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) experiments, the formation of Cu(hfac)2, the product of disproportion reaction of Cu(hfac), was observed in the gas phase and (hfac)Cu(ATMS) was found to be more reactive to form Cu(hfac)2. The minimum temperature for the deposition of copper films from (hfac)Cu(ATMS) was as low as 60 °C, which was about 70 °C lower than from (hfac)Cu(VTMS). The grain size of the film deposited with (hfac)Cu(ATMS) was substantially larger than that with (hfac)Cu(VTMS), which showed that the chemical reactivity of the precursor had an influence on the microstructure along with the deposition temperature.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , March 1999 , pp. 975 - 979
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Li, J., Seidel, T. E., and Mayer, J.W., MRS Bull. XIX, 15 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Valdya, S., Fraser, D. B., and Shinha, A. K., in Proceedings of the 18th Annual Reliability Physics Symposium (IEEE, New York, 1980), p. 65.Google Scholar
3.Schreiber, H. U. and Grave, B., Solid State Electron. 24, 1135 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Norman, J. A.T, Muratore, B.A., Dyer, P.N., Robert, D. A., and Hochberg, A.K., J. de Phys. IV, C2 (1991).Google Scholar
5.Reynolds, S.K., Smart, C. J., Baran, E.F., Baum, T. H., and Larson, C.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2332 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Shin, H.K., Chi, K. M., Farkas, J., Hampden-Smith, M. J., Kodas, T.T., and Duesler, E.N., Inorg. Chem. 31, 424 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Girolami, G.S., Jeffries, P. M., and Dubois, L.H., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 115, 1015 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kodas, T.T. and Hampden-Smith, M. J., in The Chemistry of Metal CVD (VCH, Cambridge, 1994), p. 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hampden-Smith, M. J. and Kodas, T. T., Polyhedron 14, 699 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Jain, A., Gelatos, A. V., Kodas, T. T., Hampden-Smith, M. J., Marsh, R., and Mogab, C. J., Thin Solid Films 262, 52 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Yoen, H. Y., Park, Y. B., and Rhee, S., J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 8, 189 (1997).Google Scholar
12.Dubois, L.H. and Zegarski, B. R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 139 (11), 3295 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Jain, A., Chi, K. M., Hampden-Smith, M. J., Kodas, T. T., Farr, J. D., and Paffert, M. F., J. Mater. Res. 7, 261 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Choi, E.S., Park, S. K., Shin, H. K., and Lee, H. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 (7), 1017 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Farkas, J., Hampden-Smith, M. J., and Kodas, T. T., J. Phys. Chem. 98 (27), 6753 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Farkas, J., Hampden-Smith, M. J., and Kodas, T. T., J. Phys. Chem. 98 (27), 6763 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar