Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:23:44.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study on effects of special casting processes on microstructural development in Cu–10Al–4Fe–4Ni alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2013

Gaoyong Lin*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; and Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Metal Materials Science and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Yuxia Lei
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Juhua Zeng
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Han Li
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Xiuzhi Xu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Suction casting (SC) and centrifugal casting (CC) are two common special casting processes. The influences of SC and CC on the microstructural development of Cu–10Al–4Fe–4Ni aluminum bronzes were investigated with continuous cooling method. The results indicate that α, β′, KII, and KIII phases are observed in the quasicast microstructure via the SC process with the precipitation sequence of KII → α → KIII. Additionally, KI and KIV are observed in the quasicast microstructure via the CC process with the precipitation sequence of α + K → KII → KIV → KIII. Phase initial precipitation temperatures of the CC process are higher than that of the SC process, especially for α phase. As the quenching temperature decreases, the hardness of both alloys shows a rapid decline trend and finally reaches a steady state. It is found that the eutectoid decomposition (β → α + KIII) barely affects the hardness of the alloys.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gupta, R.K., Ghosh, B.R., and Sinha, P.P.: Design of heat treatment cycle for hardness improvement of Cu-9Al-6Ni-5Fe alloy. Can. Metall. Q. 353, 45 (2006).Google Scholar
Suresh, N. and Ramamurty, U.: Aging response and its effect on the functional properties of Cu-Al-Ni shape memory alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 113, 449 (2008).Google Scholar
Zhang, D.T., Chen, R.P., Zhang, W.W., and Luo, Z.Q.: Effect of microstructure on the mechanical and corrosion behaviors of a hot-extruded nickel aluminum bronze. Acta Metall. Sinica 113, 23 (2010).Google Scholar
Ni, D.R., Xiao, B.L., Ma, Z.Y., Qiao, Y.X., and Zheng, Y.G.: Corrosion properties of friction-stir processed cast NiAl bronze. Corros. Sci. 1610, 52 (2010).Google Scholar
Kaplan, M. and Yildiz, A.K.: The effects of production methods on the microstructures and mechanical properties of an aluminum bronze. Mater. Lett. 4402, 53 (2003).Google Scholar
Kudashov, D.V., Zauter, R., and Muller, H.R.: Spray-formed high-aluminum bronzes. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 43, 447 (2008).Google Scholar
Jahanafrooz, A., Hasan, F., Lorimer, G.W., and Ridley, N.: Microstructural development in complex nickel-aluminum bronzes. Metall. Trans. A 1951, 14 (1983).Google Scholar
Culpan, E.A. and Barnby, J.T.: The metallography of fracture in cast nickel aluminum bronze. J. Mater. Sci. 323, 13 (1978).Google Scholar
Sun, Y.S., Lorimer, G.W., and Ridley, N.: Microstructure and its development in Cu-Al-Ni alloys. Metall. Trans. A 575, 21 (1990).Google Scholar
Recarte, V., Perez-Saez, R.B., San Juan, J., Bocanegra, E.H., and No, M.L.: Influence of Al and Ni concentration on the martensitic transformation in Cu-Al-Ni shape-memory alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2581, 33 (2002).Google Scholar
Gao, L.L. and Cheng, X.H.: Influence of Al and Ni concentration on the martensitic transformation in Cu-Al-Ni shape-memory alloys. Mater. Des. 904, 29 (2008).Google Scholar
van der Heide, E, Stam, E.D., Giraud, H., Lovato, G., Akdut, N., Clarysse, F., Caenen, P., and Heikilla, I.: Wear of aluminium bronze in sliding contact with lubricated stainless steel sheet material. Wear 68, 261 (2006).Google Scholar
Fuller, M.D., Swaminathan, S., Zhilyaev, A.P., and McNelley, T.R.: Microstructural transformations and mechanical properties of cast NiAl bronze: Effects of fusion welding and friction stir processing. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 128, 463 (2007).Google Scholar
Hasan, F., Iqbal, J., and Ridley, N.: Microstructure of as-cast aluminum bronze containing iron. Mater. Sci. Technol. 312, 1 (1985).Google Scholar
Hasan, F., Jahanafrooz, A., Lorimer, G.W., and Ridley, N.: The morphology, crystallography, and chemistry of phases in as-cast nickel-aluminum bronze. Metall. Trans. A 1337, 13 (1982).Google Scholar
Chen, R.P., Liang, Z.Q., Zhang, W.W., Zhang, D.T., and Luo, Z.Q., and Li, Y.Y.: Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and properties of hot-extruded nickel-aluminum bronze. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 1254, 17 (2007).Google Scholar