Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:22:55.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical reaction strengthening of Al/TiC metal matrix composites by isothermal heat treatment at 913 K

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

R. Mitra
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3108
M.E. Fine
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3108
J.R. Weertman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3108

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of solid state heat treatment at 913 K on extruded XD Al/TiC metal matrix composite with 0.7 and 4.0 μm particle sizes has been investigated. The interfaces between Al and TiC after extrusion were atomically abrupt, as observed by HRTEM. On holding at 913 K, the composite with submicron particle size showed substantial changes in the phases present due to reaction between Al and TiC at 913 K. The stable reaction products are Al3Ti and Al4C3. A substantial increase in Young's modulus occurs. The room and elevated temperature strength and hardness of the composite with submicron particles also increase significantly with time of heat treatment, but at the expense of ductility. The effect of heat treatment over the time range investigated is limited to the interfaces for the 4.0 μm TiC particle size composite due to longer diffusion paths.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

References

REFERENCES

1Chawla, K. K., Composite Materials Science and Engineering (MRE Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987), p. 102.Google Scholar
2Rhodes, C. G. and Spurling, R. A., in Developments in Ceramic and Metal-Matrix Composites, edited by Upadhya, K. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1992), p. 99.Google Scholar
3Clough, R. B., Biancaniello, F. S., Wadley, H. N.G., and Kattner, U. R., Metall. Trans. 21A, 2747 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Schuster, J. C., Nowotny, H., and Vaccaro, C., J. Solid State Chem. 32, 213 (1980).Google Scholar
5Norman, J. H., Reynolds, G. H., and Brewer, L., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites, edited by Anton, D. L., Martin, P. L., Miracle, D. B., and McMeeking, R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 194, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 369.Google Scholar
6Fine, M. E. and Conley, J. G., Metall. Trans. 21A, 2609 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Rapp, R. A. and Zheng, X., Metall. Trans. 22A, 3071 (1991).Google Scholar
8Yokokawa, H., Sakai, N., Kawada, T., and Dokiya, M., Metall. Trans. 22A, 3075 (1991).Google Scholar
9Banerji, A. and Reif, W., Metall. Trans. 17A, 2127 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Jafors, A., Fredriksson, H., and Froyen, L., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 135, 119 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Satyaprasad, K., Mahajan, Y. R., and Bhanuprasad, V. V., Scripta Metall. 26, 711 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Lewis, D. III, in Metal Matrix Composites: Processing and Interfaces, edited by Everett, R. K. and Arsenault, R. J. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991), p. 141.Google Scholar
13Sahoo, P. and Koczak, M. J., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 144, 37 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Premkumar, M. K. and Chu, M. G., in Development of Ceramic and Metal-Matrix Composites, edited by Upadhya, K. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1992), p. 323.Google Scholar
15Westwood, A.R.C., Metall. Trans. 19A, 749 (1988).Google Scholar
16Mitra, R., Chiou, W. A., Weertman, J. R., Fine, M. E., and Aikin, R. M. Jr., Scripta Metall. 25, 2689 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Mitra, R., Weertman, J. R., Fine, M. E., and Aikin, R. M. Jr., in. Development of Ceramic and Metal Matrix Composites, edited by Upadhya, K. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1992), p. 125.Google Scholar
18Aikin, R. M. Jr., Martin Marietta Laboratory, private communication.Google Scholar
19Fine, M. E., in Symposium on Determination of Elastic Constants (Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia, PA, 1952), ASTM STP 129, 1.Google Scholar
20Konitzer, D. G. and Loretto, M. H., Acta Metall. 37, 397 (1989).Google Scholar
21Goretzki, H., Phys. Status Solidi 20, K141 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Barin, I., Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances (VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany, 1989), pp. 17, 26, 71, 72, 1520, 1528.Google Scholar
23Sherry, P. R. and Bankard, M. H., in ASM Metals Handbook-Metallography, Structures and Phase Diagrams, edited by Lyman, T. (Metals Park, OH, 1973), Vol. 8, p. 120.Google Scholar
24Humphreys, F. J., in Dislocations and Properties of Real Materials (The Institute of Metals, London, 1985), p. 175.Google Scholar
25Jangg, G., Kutner, F., and Korb, G., Powder Metall. Inter. 9, 24 (1977).Google Scholar