Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:57:24.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The characterization of strain, impurity content, and crush strength of synthetic diamond crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Terri L. McCormick
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202
W. E. Jackson
Affiliation:
GE Superabrasives, 6325 Huntley Road, P.O. Box 568, Worthington, Ohio 43085
R. J. Nemanich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–8202
Get access

Abstract

This study addresses the correlation of the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics of synthetic diamond crystals produced by high pressure, high temperature conditions. Microscopic properties were characterized using Raman spectroscopy, birefringence, and photoluminescence (PL). Macroscopic properties characterized included inclusion content and crush force. Raman measurements detected measurable stress shifts in only two samples. The PL measurements indicated an increased presence of the H3 center in areas of high strain. The absence of the H3 center and the presence of the N-V PL center was correlated to lower average crush force. A hierarchy has been developed that relates microscopic properties to average crush force.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Wilks, J. and Wilks, E., Properties and Applications of Diamond (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar
2.Lang, A. R., Nature (London), 248–251 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Nemanich, R. J., in Annual Review of Material Science, edited by Huggins, R. A., Giordmaine, J. A., and Wachtman, J. B., Jr. (1991), Vol. 21, pp. 535–558.Google Scholar
4.Evans, T., Davey, S. T., and Robertson, S. H., J. Mater. Sci. 19, 24052414 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Davies, G., J. Phys. C 3, 24742486 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Davies, G., Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, edited by Walker, P. L. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982), Vol. 11, pp. 7071.Google Scholar
7.Clark, C. D., in Properties of Natural and Synthetic Diamond, edited by Field, J. E. (Academic Press, London, 1992), p. 66.Google Scholar
8.Van Enckevort, W. J. P. and Lochs, H. G. M., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 434437 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Webb, S. W. and Jackson, W. E., J. Mater. Res. 10, 17001709 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Grimsditch, M. H., Anastassakis, E., and Cardona, M., Phys. Rev. B 18, 901 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Tomlinson, P. N., in The Properties of Natural and Synthetic Diamonds, edited by Field, J. E. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1992), pp. 640641.Google Scholar
12.Collins, A. T., J. Phys. C 13, 26412650 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Evans, T., Davey, S. T., and Robertson, S. H., J. Mater. Sci. 19, 24052414 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hirvonen, J. K., J. Metals 39 (11), 5860 (1987).Google Scholar
15.Bokii, G. B., Kirova, N. F., and Nepsha, V. I., Sov. Phys. Dokl. 24, 8384 (1979).Google Scholar
16.Crossfield, M. D., Davies, G., Collins, A. T., and Lightowers, E. C., J. Phys. C 7, 19091917 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Burns, R. C. and Davies, G. J., in The Properties of Natural and Synthetic Diamond, edited by Field, J. E. (Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, 1992), p. 412.Google Scholar
18.Kanda, H. and Yamaoka, S., Diamond and Relat. Mater. 2, 14201423 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Wilks, E. M. and Wilks, J., Industrial Diamond Review 31, 238243 (1971).Google Scholar
20.Van Enckevort, W. J. P. and Visser, E. P., Philos. Mag. B 62, 597614 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Graham, R. J. and Ravi, K. V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 13101312 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Wilks, J., Industrial Diamond Review 33, 382390 (1973).Google Scholar
23.Bergman, L., private communication.Google Scholar