Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:15:15.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Calcia–magnesia–alumina-silica particle deposition prediction in gas turbines using a Eulerian–Lagrangian approach in computational fluid dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2020

Bono Wasistho*
Affiliation:
Kord Technologies Inc., Huntsville, Alabama35806, USA
*
Get access

Abstract

This study presents a dual Eulerian–Lagrangian particle approach for time-accurate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of volcanic ash in gas turbine engines and initial results. The objective is to enable high-fidelity simulations of calcia–magnesia–alumina-silica (CMAS) particles in gas turbine engines to better predict deposition and particle paths to rapidly test mitigation solutions. The approach uses a primarily first principles framework to account for the various physical phenomena in the system. Particles are modeled using Lagrangian methods which track individual particles and Equilibrium Eulerian methods which track particles in terms of concentration densities. Lagrangian methods become prohibitively expensive for fine particles. Eulerian methods are physically appropriate for fine particles but become inaccurate for large particle sizes. A dual approach using both Eulerian and Lagrangian methods allows for optimal computational cost with maximum accuracy. Simulation results using the proposed approach are compared against experimental data for a representative gas turbine engine blade.

Type
Invited Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stevenson, J.A., Millington, S.C., Beckett, F.M., Swindles, G.T., and Thordarson, T.: Big grains go far: Understanding the discrepancy between tephrochronology and satellite infrared measurements of volcanic ash. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8, 20692091 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, R.: Volcanoes: A hazard for air travel. Agence France-Presse, RTE News, April 15 (2010). https://www.rte.ie/news/special-reports/2010/0415/129909-volcano/Google Scholar
IATA: Flight disruptions cost airlines $ 1.7bn says IATA. BBC News, April 21 (2010). http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8634147.stmGoogle Scholar
Wright, S.: Bali flights resume, but volcanic ash still disrupts travel. AEP News, November 29 (2017). https://apnews.com/2e86fdd093f1481ba5d7abc1f16ae935/Bali-airport-repones,-but-volcano-still-spewing-ashGoogle Scholar
Murugan, M., Ghoshal, A., Walock, M.J., Barnett, B.D., Pepi, M.S., and Kerner, K.A.: Sand particle-induced deterioration of thermal barrier coatings on gas turbine blades. Adv. Aircr. Spacecr. Sci. 4, 3752 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burcat, A., Ruscic, and B.: Third millennium ideal gas and condensed phase thermochemical database for combustion with update from active thermochemical tables. Technical report, Argonne National Lab. (ANL), ANL-05/20 TAE 960, Argonne, IL, USA, September 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bons, J. and Ameri, A.: Effects of hot streak and phantom cooling on heat transfer in a cooled turbine stage including particulate deposition, Technical report, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH, USA, 179 (2016). https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1235559Google Scholar
Bonilla, C., Webb, J., Clum, C., Casaday, B., Brewer, E., and Bons, J.P.: The effect of particle size and film cooling on nozzle guide vane deposition. J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power 134 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, W., Lavallée, Y., Hess, K-U., Kueppers, U., Cimarelli, C., and Dingwell, D.B.: Volcanic ash melting under conditions relevant to ash turbine interactions. Nat. Commun. 7 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giordano, D., Russell, J.K., and Dingwell, D.B.: Viscosity of magmatic liquids: A model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271, 123134 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prenter, R., Ameri, A., and Bons, J.P.: Deposition on a cooled nozzle guide vane with nonuniform inlet temperatures. J. Turbomach. 138 (10), p. 011015 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opie, N.P..: A comparison of Afghanistan, Yuma, AZ, and manufactured sands melted on EB-PVD thermal barrier coatings. Technical report, Air Force Institute of Technology Wright-Patterson AFB OH Graduate School, 2014.Google Scholar
Cowherd, C. Jr.: Sandblaster 2 support of see-through technologies for particulate brownout. Technical report, Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, MO, 2007.Google Scholar
Najjar, F.M., Ferry, J.P., Haselbacher, A., and Balachandar, S.: Simulations of solid-propellant rockets: Effects of aluminum droplet size distribution. J. Spacecraft Rockets 43, 12581270 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. and Allmaras, S.: A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper No. 92-0439, January 6–9, Reno, NV (1992).Google Scholar
Spalart, P.R., W,-H. Jou, M. Strelets, S.R. Allmaras: Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. In Advances in DNS/LES, Proceedings of First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Rouston, Louisiana, August 4–8, Greyden Press, 137147 (1997).Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99164 (1963).2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasistho, B. and Moser, R.D.: Simulation strategy of turbulent internal flow in solid rocket motor. J. Propul. Power 21, 251263 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnov, A., Shi, S., and Celik, I.: Random flow generation technique for large-eddy simulations and particle-dynamics modeling. J Fluids Eng. 123, 359371 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, J. and Balachandar, S.: Equilibrium expansion for the Eulerian velocity of small particles. Powder Technol. 125, 131139 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Batsh, H. and Haselbacher, H.: Numerical investigation of the effects of ash particle deposition on the flow field through turbine cascades, Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air 3610, 10351043 (2001).Google Scholar
Singh, S.: Large-eddy simulations of sand transport and deposition in the internal cooling passages of gas turbine blades, PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, March 21 (2014).Google Scholar
Taltavull, C., Dean, J., and Clyne, T.W.: Adhesion of volcanic ash particles under controlled conditions and implications for their deposition in gas turbines. Adv. Eng. Mater. 18, 803813 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabakoff, W., Hamed, A., and Murugan, D.M.: Effect of target materials on the particle restitution characteristics for turbomachinery application. J. Propul. Power 12, 260266 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, C.L. and Srinivasachar, S.: Viscosity of ash particles in combustion systems for prediction of particle sticking. Energy Fuels 9, 277283 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Y.F., Vargas, F.M., and Chai, J.C.: A level-set method for convective–diffusive particle deposition. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 52455259 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Wasistho supplementary material

Wasistho supplementary material 1

Download Wasistho supplementary material(Image)
Image 305.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Wasistho supplementary material

Wasistho supplementary material 2

Download Wasistho supplementary material(Image)
Image 718.1 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Wasistho supplementary material

Wasistho supplementary material 3

Download Wasistho supplementary material(Image)
Image 728.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Wasistho supplementary material

Wasistho supplementary material 4

Download Wasistho supplementary material(Image)
Image 896.6 KB