Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:43:05.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Build orientation optimization for lightweight lattice parts production in selective laser melting by using a multicriteria genetic algorithm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2020

Renkai Huang Open the ORCID record for Renkai Huang [Opens in a new window] ,
Ning Dai  and
Xiaosheng Cheng
Renkai Huang
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing210016, China
Ning Dai*
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing210016, China
Xiaosheng Cheng
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing210016, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has enabled the development of lightweight lattice structures, which are widely used in orthopedic implant, aerospace and filtration fields. The traditional method of optimizing part build orientation has been unable to meet the demand for lightweight lattice parts. This paper proposes a novel method to obtain an optimum build orientation for lightweight lattice parts based on selective laser melting by considering two factors at a time, namely processability of lattice structures and the surface quality of functional features. First, the overhang structure area model for the evaluation of the processability of lattice structures is established; then, mesh segmentation and feature level classification of the lightweight part frame are carried out. On this basis, the adaptive feature roughness model for the evaluation of the surface quality of functional features is established; finally, a multicriteria genetic algorithm is used to solve the build orientation optimization problem of lightweight lattice parts to obtain a Pareto optimal set.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 35 , Issue 15: Focus Issue: Additive Manufacturing of Metals: Complex Microstructures and Architecture Design , 14 August 2020 , pp. 2046 - 2054
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sypeck, D.J. and Wadley, H.N.G.: Cellular metal truss core sandwich structures. Adv. Eng. Mater. 4, 759–764 (2002).3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, A.N. and Gramoll, K.: Compressive strength of composite lattice structures. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 17, 462–483 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikas, H., Stavropoulos, P., and Chryssolouris, G.: Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: A critical review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 83, 389–405 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., and Stucker, B.: Additive Manufacturing Technologies (Springer, New York, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, L., Stamp, R.C., Brooks, W.K., Jones, E., and Sutcliffe, C.J.: Selective laser melting: A regular unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous, titanium, bone in-growth constructs, suitable for orthopedic applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 89B, 325–334 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalia, M. and Mohamed, E.: Lattice structures and functionally graded materials applications in additive manufacturing of orthopedic implants: A review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process 1, 13 (2017).Google Scholar
Vasiliev, V.V., Barynin, V.A., and Razin, A.F.: Anisogrid composite lattice structures – development and aerospace applications. Compos. Struct. 94, 1117–1127 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., Yang, Y., Liu, R., Xiao, D., and Sun, J.: Study on the designing rules and processability of porous structure based on selective laser melting (SLM). J. Mater. Process. Tech. 213, 1734–1742 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wauthle, R., Vrancken, B., Beynaerts, B., Jorissen, K., Schrooten, J., Kruth, J.-P., and Humbeeck, J.V.: Effects of build orientation and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4 V lattice structures. Addit. Manuf. 5, 77–84 (2015).Google Scholar
Huang, R.K., Dai, N., Li, D.W., Cheng, X.S., Liu, H., and Sun, D.G.: Parallel non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II for optimal part deposition orientation in additive manufacturing based on functional features. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C – J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 232, 3384–3395 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moroni, G., Syam, W.P., and Petrò, S.: Functionality-based part orientation for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 36, 217–222 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., Fuh, J.Y.H., Nee, A.Y.C., Wong, Y.S., Loh, H.T., and Miyazawa, T.: Multi-objective optimization of part-building orientation in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping J. 1, 12–23 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masood, S.H., Rattanawong, W., and Iovenitti, P.: Part build orientations based on volumetric error in fused deposition modelling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 16, 162–168 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrimurthulu, K., Pandey, P.M., and Reddy, N.V.: Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manuf. 44, 585–594 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, P.M., Thrimurthulu, K., and Reddy, N.V.: Optimal part deposition orientation in FDM by using a multicriteria genetic algorithm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 42, 4069–4089 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phatak, A.M. and Pande, S.S.: Optimum part orientation in rapid prototyping using genetic algorithm. J. Manuf. Syst. 31, 395–402 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Bernard, A., Harik, R., and Karunakaran, K.P.: Build orientation optimization for multi-part production in additive manufacturing. J. Intell. Manuf. 28, 1393–1407 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Au, O.K.C., Tai, C.L., Chu, H.K., Cohen-Or, D., and Lee, T.Y.: Skeleton extraction by mesh contraction (ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strano, G., Hao, L., Everson, R.M., and Evans, K.E.: Surface roughness analysis, modelling and prediction in selective laser melting. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 213, 589–597 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivas, N. and Deb, K.: Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evol. Comput. 2, 221–248 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L.: Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms – A Comparative Case Study (Springer, Berlin, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Pratap, A., and Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, J. and Kerr, W.L.: Determination of glass transitions in boiled candies by capacitance based thermal analysis (CTA) and genetic algorithm (GA). J. Food Eng. 193, 68–75 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Paula, L.C., Soares, A.S., and de Lima, T.W.: Feature selection using genetic algorithm: An analysis of the bias-property for one-point crossover. In Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, (ACM) pp. 1461–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar