Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:49:54.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of Ball-indentation Load-depth Data: Part I. Determining Elastic Modulus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

B. Taljat
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6140
T. Zacharia
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6140
F. M. Haggag
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831–6140
Get access

Abstract

Analysis of ball-indentation process was made by the finite element (FE) method. A series of indentation FE analyses were made on materials with different elastic modulus (E), and a simple relationship between E and the load-depth (F-h) unloading data is presented. In order to check for the influence of other material properties, thorough research has been performed, introducing a combination of response surface (RS) and FE analysis. As a result, a relationship between the indentation unloading slope, E, and the strain hardening exponent was derived. Also, the indenter compliance effect has been investigated. The indenter compliance correction was calculated and applied to the experimentally measured F-h results. Experimental testing was made on three materials with essentially different elastic moduli. Comparison of the results obtained by newly developed equations with the results from other well-known equations is also presented.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hertz, H., Miscellaneous Papers by H. Hertz, edited by Jones, and Schott, (Macmillan, London, 1896).Google Scholar
2.Tabor, D., The Hardness of Metals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1951).Google Scholar
3.Sneddon, I. N., Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 4757 (1965).Google Scholar
4.Sneddon, I. N., Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 42, 29 (1946).Google Scholar
5.Sneddon, I. N., Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 44, 429 (1948).Google Scholar
6.Pharr, G. M., Oliver, W. C., and Brotzen, F. R., J. Mater. Res. 7, 613617 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 15641583 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Francis, H. A., Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 272–281 (July 1976).Google Scholar
9.Bhattacharya, A. K. and Nix, W. D., Int. J. Solids Structures 27 (8), 10471058 (1991).Google Scholar
10.Giannakopoulos, A. E., Larson, P. L., and Vestergaard, R., Int. J. Solids Structures 31 (19), 26792708 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Taljat, B., Determining Stress-Strain Curves of Metals by Nondestructive Continuous Ball-Indentation Method, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
12.Timoshenko, S. P. and Goodier, J. N., Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
13.Myers, R. H., Response Surface Methodology (Allyn and Bacon Inc., Boston, New York, 1971).Google Scholar