Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:44:05.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of XeCl laser ablation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-carbon fiber composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

P.E. Dyer ,
S.T. Lau ,
G.A. Oldershaw  and
D. Schudel
P.E. Dyer
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, School of Engineering and Computing, The University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
S.T. Lau*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, School of Engineering and Computing, The University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
G.A. Oldershaw
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, The University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
D. Schudel
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, The University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
*
a)Present address: British Petroleum International Ltd., Sunbury Research Centre, Sunbury-on-Thames, United Kingdom.
Get access

Abstract

The XeCl laser ablation of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-carbon fiber composite (APC-2) is reported. Etch rates and measurements of the ablation products have been carried out, together with scanning electron microscope evaluation of the etch craters. Selective removal of the PEEK matrix occurs for fluences ∼70–400 mJ cm−2. Net composite etching commences at ∼420 mJ cm−2, with an etch rate above this value that is determined by the carbon fibers and is consistent with thermal vaporization at high temperature (≥4000 K).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 5 , May 1992 , pp. 1152 - 1157
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Srinivasan, R., Science 234, 559 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. See, for example, Thermal and Optical Interactions with Biological and Related Composite Materials, edited by Berry, M. J. and Harpole, G. M., Proc. SPIE 1064 (1989).Google Scholar
3.Wehner, M., Poprawe, R., and Trasser, F. J., in Excimer Lasers and Applications, Proc. SPIE 1023, 179 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Proudley, G. M. and Key, P. H., in High Power Lasers and Laser Machining Technologies, Proc. SPIE 1132, 111 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Niino, H., Nakano, M., Nagano, S., Nitta, H., Yano, K., and Yabe, A., J. Photopolymer Sci. Technol. 3, 53 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Dyer, P. E., Oldershaw, G. A., and Schudel, D., Appl. Phys. B 51, 314 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Whittaker, A. J., Taylor, R., and Tawil, H., Proc. R. Soc. London A 430, 167 (1990).Google Scholar
8.Rothschild, M., Arnone, C., and Ehrlich, D. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 4, 310 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Okabe, H., Photochemistry of Small Molecules (Wiley, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
10.Ready, J. F., Effects of High Power Laser Radiation (Academic Press, London, 1971).Google Scholar
11.JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 2nd ed. (National Bureau of Standards, U. S. Department of Commerce, 1971).Google Scholar
12.Klein, C. A., Berry, M. J., and Miles, P. A., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3425 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kaye, G. W. C. and Laby, T. H., Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants, 14th ed. (Longman, London, 1978).Google Scholar
14.Dreyfus, R. W., Kelly, R., Walkup, R. E., and Srinivasan, R., in Excimer Lasers and Optics, Proc. SPIE 710, 46 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar