Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:17:56.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tribology of diamond-like carbon sliding against itself, silicon nitride, and steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

K. Jia
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
Y.Q. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
T.E. Fischer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
B. Gallois
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
Get access

Abstract

Diamond-like carbon (DLC) films were deposited on (100) silicon wafers and silicon nitride balls by RF plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposition at a pressure of 700 mTorr and a substrate temperature of 360 K. The friction coefficient and the wear rates were measured using a pin-on-disk tribometer in 40% humid and dry air. Friction coefficients are near 0.05 in all cases measured. In dry air, the wear of silicon nitride and steel against DLC is below measurement capability because of a protecting DLC transfer layer, and wear of DLC is 2.5 ± 10−8 mm3/Nm against silicon nitride and 6.5 ± 10−9 mm3/Nm against steel. In humid air, the DLC transfer layer does not adhere to the solids, and wear of both bodies is larger. Unmeasurable wear is obtained when DLC slides against itself in humid air; the wear rate is 5 ± 10−9 mm3/Nm in dry air. These results are interpreted in terms of the properties of a friction-induced transformation of the surface layer of DLC.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Enke, K., Thins Solid Films 80, 227234 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Memming, R., Tolle, H. J., and Wierenga, P. E., Thin Solid Films 143, 3141 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Oguri, K. and Arai, T., J. Mater. Res. 5, 25672571 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Kim, D. S., Fischer, T. E., and Gallois, B., Surf. Coatings Technol. 49, 537542 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Miyoshi, K., Wu, R. L. C., and Garscadden, A., Surf. Coatings Technol. 54̸55, 428434 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Hirvonen, J-P., Lappalainen, R., Koskinen, J., Anttila, A., Jervis, T. R., and Trkula, M., J. Mater. Res. 5, 25242530 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Grill, A., Patel, V., and Beyerson, B.S., J. Mater. Res. 5, 25312537 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Wu, R. L. C., Miyoshi, K., Vuppuladhudium, R., and Jackson, H. E., Surf. Coatings Technol. 54̸55, 576580 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Marchon, B., Heiman, N., and Khan, M. R., IEEE Trans. Magnetics 26, 168170 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Dearnaley, G., Clinical Materials 12, 237244 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Tomizawa, H. and Fischer, T. E., ASLE Trans. 30, 4146 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar