Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:37:32.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The topaz to mullite transformation on heating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

R.A. Day ,
E.R. Vance ,
D.J. Cassidy  and
J.S. Hartman
R.A. Day
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Program, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Private Mail Bag I, Menai, New South Wales 2234, Australia
E.R. Vance
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Program, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Private Mail Bag I, Menai, New South Wales 2234, Australia
D.J. Cassidy
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials Program, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Private Mail Bag I, Menai, New South Wales 2234, Australia
J.S. Hartman
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario, L2S3Al. Canada
Get access

Abstract

The decomposition of topaz to mullite and other siliceous phases on heating above about 1100 °C was found to depend on sample size and the presence of water vapor in the heating atmosphere. The principal experimental technique employed was scanning electron microscopy, but the data were supported by x-ray diffraction, thermal analysis, mass spectroscopy of volatile emissions, and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance. In relatively large samples, the transformation to mullite evidently takes place by a vapor phase mechanism within the bulk. The surface reaction that took place for samples heated in a wet atmosphere allowed the formation of high-silica glass, as well as mullite. The use of a hydrogenous heating atmosphere resulted in the sublimation and reformation of mullite whiskers, well outside the boundary of the original topaz.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 10 , Issue 11 , November 1995 , pp. 2963 - 2969
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Hampar, M. S. and Zussman, J., TMPM Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt. 33, 235 (1984).Google Scholar
2Moyer, J.R. and Hughes, N.N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 1083 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Okada, K. and Otsuka, N., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 8, 1052 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Iwai, S., Ossaka, J., Akao, M., and Isobe, M., Bull. Tokyo Inst. Tech. 103, 29 (1971).Google Scholar
5Aines, R.D. and Rossman, G. R., Am. Mineral. 70, 1169 (1985).Google Scholar
6Schneider, H., Merwin, L., and Sebald, A., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 805 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Merwin, L.H., Sebald, A., Rager, H., and Schneider, H., Phys. Chem. Mineral. 18, 47 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Hartman, J.S. and Sherriff, B. L., J. Phys. Chem. 95, 7575 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Cornu, A. and Massot, R., Compilation of Mass Spectral Data, 2nd ed. (Heydon and Son, London, 1967).Google Scholar
10Kriven, W.M. and Pask, J. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 649 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A., and Zussman, J., Rock-Forming Minerals (Longmans, London, 1982), Vol. 1A, p. 742.Google Scholar
12Hayashi, T., Mihoya, M., Yami, I., Saito, H., and Hirano, S., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 1305 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar