Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:48:25.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tailoring plasticity of metallic glasses via interfaces in Cu/amorphous CuNb laminates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2017

Zhe Fan ,
Qiang Li ,
Jin Li ,
Sichuang Xue ,
Haiyan Wang  and
Xinghang Zhang
Zhe Fan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3123, USA
Qiang Li
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
Jin Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3003, USA
Sichuang Xue
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3123, USA
Haiyan Wang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA; and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
Xinghang Zhang*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: [email protected]
b) e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Metallic glasses (MGs) are known to have high strength, but poor ductility. Prior studies have shown that plasticity in MG can be enhanced by significantly reducing their dimension to nanoscale. Here we show that, via the introduction of certain types of crystalline/amorphous interfaces, plasticity of MG can be prominently enhanced as manifested by the formation of ductile “dimples” in a 2 μm thick amorphous CuNb film. By tailoring the volume fraction and architecture of crystalline/amorphous multilayers, tensile fracture surface of MG can evolve from brittle featureless morphology to containing ductile dimples. In situ micropillar compression studies performed inside a scanning electron microscope show that shear instability in amorphous layers can be inhibited by interfaces. The mechanisms for improving plasticity and fracture resistance of MG via interface and size effect are discussed.

Keywords

amorphouscrystallinethin film
Type
Invited Papers
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 14 , 28 July 2017 , pp. 2680 - 2689
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Ashby, M.F. and Greer, A.L.: Metallic glasses as structural materials. Scr. Mater. 54, 321 (2006).Google Scholar
Tian, L., Cheng, Y-Q., Shan, Z-W., Li, J., Wang, C-C., Han, X-D., Sun, J., and Ma, E.: Approaching the ideal elastic limit of metallic glasses. Nat. Commun. 3, 609 (2012).Google Scholar
Greer, A.L. and Ma, E.: Bulk metallic glasses: At the ccutting edge of metals research. MRS Bull. 32, 611 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z.F., Eckert, J., and Schultz, L.: Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 51, 1167 (2003).Google Scholar
Schuh, C.A., Hufnagel, T.C., and Ramamurty, U.: Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 55, 4067 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, A.L., Cheng, Y.Q., and Ma, E.: Shear bands in metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng., R 74, 71 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi-Yim, H. and Johnson, W.L.: Bulk metallic glass matrix composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3808 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.L., Li, Y., and Schuh, C.A.: Effect of a controlled volume fraction of dendritic phases on tensile and compressive ductility in La-based metallic glass matrix composites. Acta Mater. 52, 4121 (2004).Google Scholar
Eckert, J., Das, J., Pauly, S., and Duhamel, C.: Mechanical properties of bulk metallic glasses and composites. J. Mater. Res. 22, 285 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, G., Löser, W., Eckert, J., and Schultz, L.: Enhanced plasticity in a Ti-based bulk metallic glass-forming alloy by in situ formation of a composite microstructure. J. Mater. Res. 17, 3015 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Cheng, J., and Liu, C.T.: Large-sized Zr-based bulk-metallic-glass composite with enhanced tensile properties. Intermetallics 28, 25 (2012).Google Scholar
Hofmann, D.C., Suh, J-Y., Wiest, A., Duan, G., Lind, M-L., Demetriou, M.D., and Johnson, W.L.: Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility. Nature 451, 1085 (2008).Google Scholar
Kim, J.Y., Jang, D., and Greer, J.R.: Nanolaminates utilizing size-dependent homogeneous plasticity of metallic glasses. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 4550 (2011).Google Scholar
Guo, W., Jägle, E., Yao, J., Maier, V., Korte-Kerzel, S., Schneider, J.M., and Raabe, D.: Intrinsic and extrinsic size effects in the deformation of amorphous CuZr/nanocrystalline Cu nanolaminates. Acta Mater. 80, 94 (2014).Google Scholar
Donohue, A., Spaepen, F., Hoagland, R., and Misra, A.: Suppression of the shear band instability during plastic flow of nanometer-scale confined metallic glasses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 241905 (2007).Google Scholar
Huang, H., Pei, H., Chang, Y., Lee, C., and Huang, J.: Tensile behaviors of amorphous-ZrCu/nanocrystalline-Cu multilayered thin film on polyimide substrate. Thin Solid Films 529, 177 (2013).Google Scholar
Nieh, T. and Wadsworth, J.: Bypassing shear band nucleation and ductilization of an amorphous–crystalline nanolaminate in tension. Intermetallics 16, 1156 (2008).Google Scholar
Wang, J., Zhou, Q., Shao, S., and Misra, A.: Strength and plasticity of nanolaminated materials. Mater. Res. Lett. 5, 1 (2017).Google Scholar
Knorr, I., Cordero, N., Lilleodden, E.T., and Volkert, C.A.: Mechanical behavior of nanoscale Cu/PdSi multilayers. Acta Mater. 61, 4984 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Li, J., Hamza, A.V., and Barbee, T.W.: Ductile crystalline–amorphous nanolaminates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 11155 (2007).Google Scholar
Liu, M., Huang, J., Chou, H., Lai, Y., Lee, C., and Nieh, T.: A nanoscaled underlayer confinement approach for achieving extraordinarily plastic amorphous thin film. Scr. Mater. 61, 840 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, B-G., Kim, J-Y., Kim, Y-J., Choi, I-C., Shim, S., Tsui, T.Y., Bei, H., Ramamurty, U., and Jang, J-I.: Increased time-dependent room temperature plasticity in metallic glass nanopillars and its size-dependency. Int. J. Plast. 37, 108 (2012).Google Scholar
Jang, D., Gross, C.T., and Greer, J.R.: Effects of size on the strength and deformation mechanism in Zr-based metallic glasses. Int. J. Plast. 27, 858 (2011).Google Scholar
Volkert, C., Donohue, A., and Spaepen, F.: Effect of sample size on deformation in amorphous metals. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 83539 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Liu, G., Lei, S., Niu, J., and Sun, J.: Transition from homogeneous-like to shear-band deformation in nanolayered crystalline Cu/amorphous Cu–Zr micropillars: Intrinsic vs. extrinsic size effect. Acta Mater. 60, 7183 (2012).Google Scholar
Liu, M.C., Lee, C.J., Lai, Y.H., and Huang, J.C.: Microscale deformation behavior of amorphous/nanocrystalline multilayered pillars. Thin Solid Films 518, 7295 (2010).Google Scholar
Bharathula, A., Lee, S-W., Wright, W.J., and Flores, K.M.: Compression testing of metallic glass at small length scales: Effects on deformation mode and stability. Acta Mater. 58, 5789 (2010).Google Scholar
Sun, B.A. and Wang, W.H.: The fracture of bulk metallic glasses. Prog. Mater. Sci. 74, 211 (2015).Google Scholar
Leamy, H., Wang, T., and Chen, H.: Plastic flow and fracture of metallic glass. Metall. Trans. 3, 699 (1972).Google Scholar
Narasimhan, R., Tandaiya, P., Singh, I., Narayan, R., and Ramamurty, U.: Fracture in metallic glasses: Mechanics and mechanisms. Int. J. Fract. 191, 53 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D., Ocelik, V., Bronsveld, P., and De Hosson, J.T.M.: An electron microscopy appraisal of tensile fracture in metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 56, 1762 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, C., Schroeder, V., and Ritchie, R.: Mechanisms for fracture and fatigue-crack propagation in a bulk metallic glass. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30, 1739 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaepen, F.: On the fracture morphology of metallic glasses. Acta Metall. 23, 615 (1975).Google Scholar
Gu, X.J., Poon, S.J., Shiflet, G.J., and Lewandowski, J.J.: Ductile-to-brittle transition in a Ti-based bulk metallic glass. Scr. Mater. 60, 1027 (2009).Google Scholar
Liu, Y.H., Wang, G., Wang, R.J., Pan, M.X., and Wang, W.H.: Super plastic bulk metallic glasses at room temperature. Science 315, 1385 (2007).Google Scholar
Bei, H., Xie, S., and George, E.P.: Softening caused by profuse shear banding in a bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 105503 (2006).Google Scholar
Xu, J., Ramamurty, U., and Ma, E.: The fracture toughness of bulk metallic glasses. JOM 62, 10 (2010).Google Scholar
Xi, X.K., Zhao, D.Q., Pan, M.X., Wang, W.H., Wu, Y., and Lewandowski, J.J.: Fracture of brittle metallic glasses: Brittleness or plasticity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 125510 (2005).Google Scholar
Lewandowski, J., Wang, W., and Greer, A.: Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philos. Mag. Lett. 85, 77 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macionczyk, F. and Brückner, W.: Tensile testing of AlCu thin films on polyimide foils. J. Appl. Phys. 86, 4922 (1999).Google Scholar
Denis, Y. and Spaepen, F.: The yield strength of thin copper films on Kapton. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 2991 (2004).Google Scholar
Jang, D. and Greer, J.R.: Transition from a strong-yet-brittle to a stronger-and-ductile state by size reduction of metallic glasses. Nat. Mater. 9, 215 (2010).Google Scholar
Tan, H.F., Zhang, B., Yang, Y.K., Zhu, X.F., and Zhang, G.P.: Fracture behavior of sandwich-structured metal/amorphous alloy/metal composites. Mater. Des. 90, 60 (2016).Google Scholar
Pampillo, C.A.: Flow and fracture in amorphous alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 10, 1194 (1975).Google Scholar
Liu, H.S., Zhang, B., and Zhang, G.P.: Enhanced toughness and fatigue strength of cold roll bonded Cu/Cu laminated composites with mechanical contrast. Scr. Mater. 65, 891 (2011).Google Scholar
Wang, G., Zhao, D., Bai, H., Pan, M., Xia, A., Han, B., Xi, X., Wu, Y., and Wang, W.: Nanoscale periodic morphologies on the fracture surface of brittle metallic glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 235501 (2007).Google Scholar
Fan, Z., Xue, S., Wang, J., Yu, K.Y., Wang, H., and Zhang, X.: Unusual size dependent strengthening mechanisms of Cu/amorphous CuNb multilayers. Acta Mater. 120, 327 (2016).Google Scholar
Fan, Z., Liu, Y., Xue, S., Rahimi, R.M., Bahr, D.F., Wang, H., and Zhang, X.: Layer thickness dependent strain rate sensitivity of Cu/amorphous CuNb multilayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 161905 (2017).Google Scholar
Schuh, C., Nieh, T., and Kawamura, Y.: Rate dependence of serrated flow during nanoindentation of a bulk metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 17, 1651 (2002).Google Scholar
Jiang, W. and Atzmon, M.: Rate dependence of serrated flow in a metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 18, 755 (2003).Google Scholar
Nix, W.D. and Gao, H.: Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: A law for strain gradient plasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46, 411 (1998).Google Scholar
Huang, L., Zhou, J., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., and Liu, Y.: Effects of interface and microstructure on the mechanical behaviors of crystalline Cu-amorphous Cu/Zr nanolaminates. Mater. Des. 36, 6 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandl, C., Germann, T., and Misra, A.: Structure and shear deformation of metallic crystalline–amorphous interfaces. Acta Mater. 61, 3600 (2013).Google Scholar
Wang, J. and Misra, A.: An overview of interface-dominated deformation mechanisms in metallic multilayers. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 15, 20 (2011).Google Scholar
Tian, L., Shan, Z-W., and Ma, E.: Ductile necking behavior of nanoscale metallic glasses under uniaxial tension at room temperature. Acta Mater. 61, 4823 (2013).Google Scholar
Guo, H., Yan, P., Wang, Y., Tan, J., Zhang, Z., Sui, M., and Ma, E.: Tensile ductility and necking of metallic glass. Nat. Mater. 6, 735 (2007).Google Scholar

Fan supplementary material

Video 1

Download Fan supplementary material(Video)
Video 46.9 MB

Fan supplementary material

Video 2

Download Fan supplementary material(Video)
Video 81 MB