Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:40:13.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural variations in strained crystalline multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

J. Hoekstra
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, FB-10, Seattle, Washington 98195
H. Yan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, FB-10, Seattle, Washington 98195
G. Kalonji
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, FB-10, Seattle, Washington 98195
H. Jónsson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, BG-10, Seattle, Washington 98195
Get access

Abstract

We present a computer simulation study of thin crystalline multilayers constructed from two fcc solids with differing lattice constants and binding energies. Initially the two solids have the same orientation, and the interface is perpendicular to the common [100] direction. We then minimize the energy of the system at zero temperature or equilibrate it at a finite temperature. Both materials are described by Lennard-Jones interatomic potentials. A novel technique for analyzing local atomic ordering, common neighbor analysis, is used to identify structural characteristics in these systems. As we gradually vary the lattice mismatch between the two solids, several structural changes are observed in the layers of smaller atoms after energy minimization. At a mismatch larger than 14%, the layers transform into the hep structure, while at smaller mismatches extended structural defects are generated. At elevated temperatures, the hcp structure is transformed back to fcc, and the structure defects disappear.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Jankowski, A. and Tsakalakos, T., Mater. Sci. Eng. B 6, 87 (1990).Google Scholar
2Phillpot, S. R. and Wolf, D., Scripta Metall. Mater. 24, 1109 (1990).Google Scholar
3Jaszczak, J. A., Phillpot, S. R., and Wolf, D., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 4573 (1990).Google Scholar
4Jaszczak, J. A. and Wolf, D., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1207 (1991).Google Scholar
5Jones, R. S., Slotwinski, J. A., and Mintmire, J. W., Phys. Rev. B 45, 13624 (1992).Google Scholar
6Imafuku, M., Sasajima, Y., Yamamoto, R., and Doyama, M., J. Phys. F 16, 823 (1986).Google Scholar
7Milstein, F. and Farber, B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 277 (1980).Google Scholar
8Parrinello, M. and Rahman, A., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182 (1981).Google Scholar
9Thakur, K. P., Phys. Rev. B 26, 3001 (1982).Google Scholar
10Seyoum, K., Thakur, K. P., and Jha, D., Phys. Status Solidi 167, 495 (1991).Google Scholar
11Taiwo, A., Yan, H., and Kalonji, G., in Materials Theory and Modelling, edited by Broughton, J., Bristowe, P. D., and Newsam, J. M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 291, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993).Google Scholar
12Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
13Allen, M. P. and Tildesley, D. J., Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
14Clarke, A. S. and Jonsson, H., Phys. Rev. E 47, 3975 (1993); Faken, D. and Jonsson, H., Comp. Mater. Sci. 2, 279 (1994).Google Scholar
15van de Waals, B. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3263 (1991). Fullerton, E. E., Schuller, I. K., Parker, F. T., Svinarich, K. A., Eesley, G. L., Bhadra, R., and Grimsditch, M., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 7370 (1993).Google Scholar