Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:12:38.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Static and dynamic hydrophobicity of alumina-based porous ceramics impregnated with fluorinated oil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2014

Yuta Tsuruki ,
Munetoshi Sakai ,
Toshihiro Isobe ,
Sachiko Matsushita  and
Akira Nakajima
Yuta Tsuruki
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramic Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan
Munetoshi Sakai
Affiliation:
Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 213-0012, Japan
Toshihiro Isobe
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramic Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan
Sachiko Matsushita
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramic Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan
Akira Nakajima*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Ceramic Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan; and Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 213-0012, Japan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Using phase separation, alumina-based porous ceramics with three-dimensional frameworks were prepared, with fine structural roughness created by subsequent hot-water treatment. The pore volume of the porous alumina and its specific surface area increased concomitantly with increasing hot-water treatment time. Porous alumina/fluorinated oil bulk composites were prepared by coating hydrophobic silane onto the porous ceramic surface and subsequently impregnating fluorinated oil. A wetting ridge formed at the bottom of the water droplets on the composites. Partial contact between the water and solid surface was inferred from a comparison of interface energies in the system. The composites provided a smaller sliding angle (SA) than that of the sample without impregnating fluorinated oil. The composite with fine roughness exhibited longer sustainability of a small SA than that without fine roughness. Particle image velocimetry revealed that the dominant sliding mode for water droplets on this composite was slipping. The droplets moved on the surface under an external electric field. Coulombic force contributes to this motion.

Keywords

ceramiccompositeliquid
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 14 , 28 July 2014 , pp. 1546 - 1555
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Nakajima, A.: Design of hydrophobic surfaces for liquid droplet control. NPG Asia Mater. 3, 49–56 (2011).Google Scholar
Wenzel, R.N.: Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28, 988–994 (1936).Google Scholar
Cassie, A.B.D. and Baxter, S.: Wettablity of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 546–551 (1944).Google Scholar
Nakajima, A., Hashimoto, K., and Watanabe, T.: Recent studies on super-hydrophobic films. Monatsh. Chem. 132, 31–41 (2001).Google Scholar
Feng, X. and Jiang, L.: Design and creation of superwetting/antiwetting surfaces. Adv. Mater. 18, 3063–3078 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossey, R.: Self-cleaning surfaces—virtual realities. Nat. Mater. 2, 301–306 (2003).Google Scholar
Miwa, M., Nakajima, A., Fujishima, A., Hashimoto, K., and Watanabe, T.: Effects of the surface roughness on sliding angles of water droplets on super-hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 16, 5754–5760 (2000).Google Scholar
McHale, G., Shirtcliffe, N.J., and Newton, M.I.: Contact-angle hysteresis on super-hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 20, 10146–10149 (2004).Google Scholar
Nguyen, T.P., Brunet, P., Coffinier, Y., and Boukherroub, R.: Quantitative testing of robustness on superomniphobic surfaces by drop impact. Langmuir 26, 18369–18373 (2010).Google Scholar
Bocquet, L. and Lauga, E.: A smooth future? Nat. Mater. 10, 334–337 (2011).Google Scholar
Wong, T-S., Kang, S.H., Tang, S.K.Y., Smythe, E.J., Hatton, B.D., Grinthal, A., and Aizenberg, J.: Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity. Nature 477, 443–447 (2011).Google Scholar
Courbin, L., Denieul, E., Dressaire, E., Roper, M., Ajdari, A., and Stone, H.A.: Imbibition by polygonal spreading on microdecorated surfaces. Nat. Mater. 6, 661–664 (2007).Google Scholar
Bauer, U. and Federle, W.: The insect-trapping rim of Nepenthes pitchers: Surface structure and function. Plant Signal. Behav. 4, 1019–1023 (2009).Google Scholar
Lafuma, A. and Quéré, D.: Slippery pre-suffused surfaces. Europhysics Lett. 96, 56001 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, W., Higaki, Y., Otsuka, H., and Takahara, A.: Perfluoropolyether-infused nano-texture: A versatile approach to omniphobic coatings with low hysteresis and high transparency. Chem. Commun. 49, 597–599 (2013).Google Scholar
Stone, H.A.: Ice-phobic surfaces that are wet. ACS Nano 6, 6536–6540 (2012).Google Scholar
Kim, P., Wong, T-S., Alvarenga, J., Kreder, M.J., Adorno-Martinez, W.E., and Aizenberg, J.: Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance. ACS Nano 6, 6569–6577 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rykaczewski, K., Anand, S., Subramanyam, S.B., and Varanasi, K.K.: Mechanism of frost formation on lubricant-impregnated surfaces. Langmuir 29, 5230–5238 (2013).Google Scholar
Anand, S., Paxson, A.T., Dhiman, R., Smith, J.D., and Varanasi, K.K.: Enhanced condensation on lubricant-impregnated nanotextured surfaces. ACS Nano 6, 10122–10129 (2012).Google Scholar
Smith, J.D., Dhiman, R., Anand, S., Reza-Garduno, E., Cohen, R.E., McKinleya, G.H., and Varanasi, K.K.: Droplet mobility on lubricant-impregnated surfaces. Soft Matter 9, 1772–1780 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, N., Belisle, R.A., Hatton, B., Wong, T-S., and Aizenberg, J.: Transparency and damage tolerance of patternable omniphobic lubricated surfaces based on inverse colloidal monolayers. Nat. Commun. 4, 2167 (2013).Google Scholar
Yao, X., Hu, Y., Grinthal, A., Wong, T-S., Mahadevan, L., and Aizenberg, J.: Adaptive fluid-infused porous films with tunable transparency and wettability. Nat. Mater. 12, 529–534 (2013).Google Scholar
Gogte, S., Vorobieff, P., Truesdell, R., Mammoli, A., van Swol, F., Shah, P., and Brinker, C.J.: Effective slip on textured superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 17, 51701 (2005).Google Scholar
Hodges, S.R., Jensen, O.E., and Rallison, J.M.: Sliding, slipping and rolling: The sedimentation of a viscous drop down a gently inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 512, 95–131 (2004).Google Scholar
Brzoska, J.B., Brochard, F., and Rondelez, F.: Motions of droplets on hydrophobic model surfaces induced by thermal gradients. Langmuir 9, 2220–2224 (1993).Google Scholar
Takeda, K., Nakajima, A., Hashimoto, K., and Watanabe, T.: Control of water droplets on super-hydrophobic surfaces by static electric field. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41, 287–291 (2002).Google Scholar
Hong, X., Gao, X., and Jiang, L.: Application of superhydrophobic surface with high adhesive force in no lost transport of superparamagnetic microdroplet. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 1478–1479 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ichimura, K., Oh, S-K., and Nakagawa, M.: Light-driven motion of liquids on a photoresponsive surface. Science 288, 1624–1626 (2000).Google Scholar
Hashimoto, A., Sakai, M., Yoshida, N., Suzuki, S., Kameshima, Y., and Nakajima, A.: Direct measurement of the motion of water droplets on a hydrophobic self-assembled monolayer surface under airflow. J. Surf. Finishing Soc. Jpn. 59, 907–912 (2008).Google Scholar
Tokudome, Y., Fujita, K., and Nakanishi, K.: Synthesis of monolithic Al2O3 with well-defined macropores and mesostructured skeletons via the sol–gel process accompanied by phase separation. Chem. Mater. 13, 3393–3398 (2007).Google Scholar
Tadanaga, K., Katata, N., and Minami, T.: Formation process of super-water-repellent Al2O3 coating films with high transparency by the sol–gel method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 3213–3216 (1997).Google Scholar
Sakai, M., Hashimoto, A., Yoshida, N., Suzuki, S., Kameshima, Y., and Nakajima, A.: An image analysis system for evaluating sliding behavior of a liquid droplet on a hydrophobic surface. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 045103 (2007).Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., Nakajima, A., Sakai, M., Sakurada, Y., Yoshida, N., Hashimoto, A., Kameshima, Y., and Okada, K.: Slipping and rolling ratio of sliding acceleration for a water droplet sliding on fluoroalkylsilane coatings of different roughness. Chem. Lett. 37, 58–59 (2008).Google Scholar
Misra, W.C. ed.: Oxides and Hydroxides of Alumina. Alcoa Technical Paper No. 19. (Alcoa Laboratories, 1987); p. 15.Google Scholar
Furuta, T., Sakai, M., Isobe, T., and Nakajima, A.: Evaporation behavior of a microliter and sub-nanoliter scale water droplets on two different fluoroalkylsilane coatings. Langmuir 25, 11998–12001 (2009).Google Scholar
Nakajima, A., Hoshino, M., Song, J-H., Kameshima, Y., and Okada, K.: Effect of roughness on lipophobicity of a surface prepared using boehmite nanoparticles and fluoroalkylsilane. Chem. Lett. 34, 908–909 (2005).Google Scholar
Furuta, T., Sakai, M., Isobe, T., Matsushita, S., and Nakajima, A.: Sliding of water droplets on hydrophobic surfaces with various hydrophilic region sizes. Langmuir 27, 7307–7313 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öner, D. and McCarthy, T.J.: Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir 16, 7777–7782 (2000).Google Scholar
Iliev, S.D. and Pesheva, N.C.: Wetting properties of well-structured heterogeneous substrates. Langmuir 19, 9923–9931 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakajima, A., Miyamoto, T., Sakai, M., Isobe, T., and Matsushita, S.: Comparative study of the impact and sliding behavior of water droplets on two different hydrophobic silane coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 292, 990–996 (2014).Google Scholar
Sakai, M., Kono, H., Nakajima, A., Sakai, H., Abe, M., and Fujishima, A.: Water droplets’ internal fluidity during horizontal motion on a superhydrophobic surface with an external electric field. Langmuir 26, 1493–1495 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diaz, A.F. and Felix-Navarro, R.M.: A semi-quantitative tribo-electric series for polymeric materials: The influence of chemical structure and properties. J. Electrostat. 62, 277–290 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yatsuzaka, K., Mizuno, Y., and Asano, K.: Electrification phenomena of distilled water dripping and sliding on polymer surface. J. Instrum. Electrostat. Jpn. 16, 401–410 (1992). [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tsuruki et al. supplementary material

Supplementary figures

Download Tsuruki et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.8 MB