Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:22:38.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Room-temperature oxidation of ultrathin TiB2 films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Feng Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487–0202, and Center for Materials for Information Technology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0209
W. J. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487–0202, and Center for Materials for Information Technology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0209
J. F. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0203
J. A. Barnard
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487–0202, and Center for Materials for Information Technology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0209
M. L. Weaver*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487–0202, and Center for Materials for Information Technology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0209
*
a)Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Titanium diboride has been claimed as a very promising candidate material for protective applications in the magnetic recording. Its oxidation resistance at room temperature is a critical criterion in assessing this application potential. In this paper, the oxidation characteristics of ultrathin TiB2 thin films, such as overcoat erosion and oxide thickness, are investigated via a combination of x-ray reflectivity, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and atomic force microscopy. It was found that a <2-h exposure to air at room temperature led to the formation of approximately 15-Å-thick, well-defined oxides at the expense of an approximately 9-Å erosion of the TiB2 overcoats, coupled with the existence of a sharp oxide/TiB2 interface. XPS studies confirmed the existence of the oxides. Considering the decreasing allowable thickness for such protective overcoats, oxidation and the resultant thickness gain negate such a potential of ultrathin TiB2 films. The results in our current report provide a new perspective on its potential as protective overcoats in magnetic recording.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Chung, Y-W. and Bhatia, C.S., Data Storage 5, 47 (1998).Google Scholar
2Anders, S., Brown, I., and Bogy, D., Data Storage 4, 31 (1997).Google Scholar
3Bhushan, B. and Ruan, J., Surf Coat. Technol. 68/69, 644 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Cutiongco, E.C., Li, D., Chung, Y-W., and Bhatia, C.S., ASME J. Tribol. 118, 543 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Ott, R.D., Scharf, T.W., Yang, D., and Barnard, J.A., IEEE Magn. 34, 1735 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Yun, X., Hsiao, R.C., and Bogy, D.B., IEEE Magn. 33, 938 (1997).Google Scholar
7Yahisa, Y., Shiroishi, Y., Hishiyama, S., Ohno, T., and Takagi, K., IEEE Magn. 26, 2685 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Ganapathi, S.K., Balanson, R.D., and Talke, F.E., ASME J. Tribol. 114, 263 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Guruz, M.U., Widlow, I., Dravid, V.P., Chung, Y-W., Wu, M-L., Lacerda, M., Bhatia, C.S., Yu, Y-h., and Lee, S.C., inSurface Engineering: In Materials Science I, edited by Seal, S., Dahotre, N.B., Moore, J.J., and Mishra, B. (The Mineral, Metals & Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 2000), p. 173.Google Scholar
10Goldschmidt, H.J.,Interstitial Alloys (Plenum, New York, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Holleck, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 4, 2661 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Huang, F., Barnard, J.A., and Weaver, M.L., J. Mater. Res. 15, 945 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Liu, W.J., Zhou, J.N., Rar, A., and Barnard, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1427 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Stierle, A., Mühge, T., and Zabel, H., J. Mater. Res. 9, 884 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Leenaers, A.J.G. and Boer, D.K.G. de, WinGIXA Manual (1998).Google Scholar
16Parratt, L.G., Phys. Rev. 95, 359 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Névot, L. and Croce, P., Rev. Phys. Appl. 15, 761 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Muralidharan, G., Wu, X.Z., You, H., Paulikas, A.P., and Veal, B.W., Scr. Mater, 37, 1177 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Huang, T.C., Gilles, R., and Will, G., Thin Solid Films 230, 99 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Huang, T.C., inAdvances in X-ray Analysis, edited by Barrett, C.S., Gilfrich, J.V., Huang, T.C., Jenkins, R., and Predecki, P.K. (Plenum, New York and London, United Kingdom, 1990), Vol. 33, p. 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Chase, M.W. Jr., Davies, C.A., Downey, J.R. Jr., Frurip, D.J., McDonald, R.A., and Syverud, A.N.,JANAF thermodynamical tables, 3rd ed. (American Chemical Society and American Institute of Physics, Washington, DC, 1986).Google Scholar
22Lengeler, B., inAdvances in X-ray Analysis, edited by Barrett, C.S., Gilfrich, J.V., Huang, T.C., Jenkins, R., McCarthy, G.J., Predecki, P.K., Ryon, R., and Smith, D.K. (Plenum, New York and London, United Kingdom, 1992), Vol. 35, p. 127.Google Scholar
23Westra, K.L. and Thomson, D.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 13, 344 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar