Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:08:15.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of antimony sulfide buffer layers in the growth of ferroelectric antimony sulfo-iodide thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

N. Solayappan
Affiliation:
Center for Electronic Materials, Devices and Systems; Department of Electrical Engineering, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3253
K. K. Raina
Affiliation:
Center for Electronic Materials, Devices and Systems; Department of Electrical Engineering, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3253
R. K. Pandey
Affiliation:
Center for Electronic Materials, Devices and Systems; Department of Electrical Engineering, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3253
U. Varshney
Affiliation:
American Research Corporation of Virginia, Radford, Virginia 24143-3406
Get access

Abstract

The growth and properties of ferroelectric antimony sulfo-iodide (SbSI) films on platinized silicon (Pt/Ta/SiO2/Si) for various applications are reported here. Films were grown with and without antimony sulfide (Sb2S3) buffer layers using the physical vapor transport technique (PVT). The Sb2S3 buffer layers significantly improve the crystalline orientation and microstructure of the SbSI films. It is possible to control the crystalline orientation of the SbSI films to a large degree by annealing the buffer layers under optimized conditions of temperature and time. The films are chemically homogeneous, uniform in thickness, and ferroelectric in nature. The PVT method is effective for the growth of device quality ferroelectric SbSI films with preferred orientation along the c-axis either perpendicular or parallel to the substrate surface. The former configuration is particularly suited for the fabrication of uncooled focal plane arrays, whereas the films with c-axis orientation parallel to the substrate are useful for the development of infrared imagers based on the pyro-optic effect. The peak dielectric constant of c-axis oriented films (perpendicular to the substrate) is determined to be 590 at the Curie point of 19 °C. This is the highest value of the dielectric constant ever reported for SbSI films.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Nitsche, R. and Merz, W. J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 13, 154 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Fatuzzo, E., Harbeke, G., Merz, W. J., Nitsche, R., Roetschi, H., and Ruppel, W., Phys. Rev. 127, 127 (1962).Google Scholar
3.Nitsche, R., Roetschi, H., and Wild, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 4, 210 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Zadorozhnaya, L. A., Lyachovitskaya, V. A., Givargizov, E. I., and Belyaev, L. M., J. Cryst. Growth 41, 61 (1977).Google Scholar
5.Toyoda, K., Ferroelectrics 69, 201 (1986).Google Scholar
6.Gerzanich, E. I., Lyakhovitskaya, L. A., Fridkin, V. M., and Popovkin, B. A., in Current Topics in Materials Science, edited by Kaldis, E. (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 141155.Google Scholar
7.Li, J., Viehland, D., Bhalla, A. S., and Cross, L. E., J. Appl. Phys. 71, 2106 (1992).Google Scholar
8.Cross, L. E., Bhalla, A., Ainger, F., and Damjanovic, D., U.S. Patent No. 4994672, 1991.Google Scholar
9.Yoshida, M., Yamanaka, K., and Hamakawa, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 1699 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Mansingh, A. and Sudarsena Rao, T., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 3530 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Ghosh, P. K., Bhalla, A. S., and Cross, L. E., Ferroelectrics 51, 29 (1983).Google Scholar
12.Narayanan, S. and Pandey, R. K., in Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Appln. of Ferroelectrics (University Park, PA, 1994), p. 309 (also see dissertation, “Growth and evaluation of ferroelectric SbSI thin films for thermal imaging applications,” by Narayanan Solayappan, Texas A&M University, May 1996).Google Scholar
13.Aleshin, V. A. and Popovkin, B. A., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Neorg. Mater. 26, 1391 (1990).Google Scholar
14.Pankrashov, A. I., Zadorozhnaya, L. A., and Givargizov, E. I., Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 32, 429 (1987).Google Scholar
15.Moon, Bum Ki and Ishiwara, Hiroshi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 1472 (1994).Google Scholar
16.Lee, Joon Sung, Kim, Chang Jung, Moon, Dae Sung, Choi, Chaun Gi, Kim, Jae Myung, and No, Kwangsoo, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 260 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Arun, P. and Vedeshawar, A. G., J. Appl. Phys. 79 (81), 4029 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar