Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:46:39.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Properties of the liquid-vapor interface of fcc metals calculated using the embedded atom method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

L.M. Holzman ,
J.B. Adams ,
S.M. Foiles  and
W.N.G. Hitchon
L.M. Holzman
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
J.B. Adams
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois–Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
S.M. Foiles
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94550
W.N.G. Hitchon
Affiliation:
Materials Science Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Get access

Abstract

The Embedded Atom Method (EAM) is used to compute density, internal energy, and structure factor for bulk liquids of the fcc metals at several temperatures above and below the melting temperature. The calculated values are found to be in generally good agreement with experiment, although the volume expansion upon melting does differ by up to 50% from the expected result for some of the elements studied. The total energy of a liquid system with surfaces is calculated, and the results are compared with the bulk liquid results to determine the enthalpy and thickness of the liquid-vapor interface. Also, the surface tension is found for Cu near the melting temperature. The EAM values for surface enthalpy and surface tension are found to be smaller than experimental values, which is consistent with results for EAM calculations of the surface energy of crystalline solids.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , February 1991 , pp. 298 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Cahill, J. A. and Kirshenbaum, A. D., J. Phys. Chem. 66, 1080 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Kingery, W. D. and Humenick, M., Jr., J. Phys. Chem. 57, 359 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3McNally, R. N., Yeh, H. C., and Balasubramanien, N., J. Mater. Sci. 3, 136 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Nogi, K., Ogino, K., McLean, A., and Miller, W. A., Metall. Trans. B 17B, 163 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev. B 32, 7685 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Lai, S. K., J. Chem. Phys. 86, 2095 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I., and Daw, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Verlet, L., Phys. Rev. 165, 201 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Foiles, S. M., Phys. Rev. B 32, 3409 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Foiles, S. M. and Daw, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 38, 12643 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Smithells Metals Reference Book, edited by Brandes, E. A., 6th ed. (Butterworth's, London, Boston, 1983), p. 945.Google Scholar
13Jones, H. and Leak, G. M., Metal Science Journal 1, 211 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Waseda, Y. and Ohtani, M., Phys. Status Solidi B 62, 535 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Turkdogan, E. T., Physical Chemistry of High Temperature Technology (Academic Press, New York, 1980), p. 89.Google Scholar