Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:55:45.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A powder x-ray diffraction study of a solution treated and ice brine quenched Al–14.25 at.% Li alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

A.G. Fox ,
S.C. Fuller ,
C.E. Whitman  and
V. Radmilovic
A.G. Fox
Affiliation:
Materials Science Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943
S.C. Fuller
Affiliation:
Materials Science Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943
C.E. Whitman
Affiliation:
Materials Science Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943
V. Radmilovic
Affiliation:
University of Belgrade, Department of Metallurgy, Belgrade 11001, P.O. Box 494, Karnegijeva 4, Yugoslavia
Get access

Abstract

An x-ray diffractogram was generated from a powder sample of solution treated and ice brine quenched Al–14.25 at.% Li alloy. The Bragg reflections obtained were characteristic of a very-nearly fully ordered Al-rich L12 phase based on δ'Al3Li together with two very weak reflections associated with δAlLi. All the lines were significantly broadened due to particle size effects. The average particle size associated with the 100 L12 superlattice line was found to be 4.2 (3) nm and with the fundamental lines, 26.8 nm. A simple structure factor calculation indicated the volume fraction of ordered phase to be around 0.77, assuming that the lack of maximum order was due to the presence of disordered fcc AlLi solid solution. These results suggest that the microstructure of this as-quenched alloy comprises ordered regions of about 4 nm in size in a sea of disordered matrix with a very small amount of δAlLi present. This conclusion is in excellent agreement with recent small angle x-ray and transmission electron microscope studies on similar alloys and suggests that AlLi alloys which are ostensibly disordered at high temperatures go through a disorder-order transformation and then decompose into regions of order and disorder which are associated with a composition spinodal.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , April 1991 , pp. 712 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Myasato, S. and Thomas, G., in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Aluminum-Lithium Alloys, edited by Starke, E. A. and Sanders, T. H., Jr. (Materials and Component Engineering Publications Ltd., Birmingham, U. K., 1989), pp. 633–640.Google Scholar
2Sato, T., Tanaka, N., and Takahashi, T., Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 29, 17 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Radmilovic, V., Fox, A. G., and Thomas, G., Acta Metall. 37, 2385 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Shaiu, B. J., Li, H. T., Lee, H. Y., and Chen, H., Metall. Trans. A 21A, 1133 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Khachaturyan, A. G., Lindsey, T. F., and Morris, J. W., Jr., Metall. Trans. A 19A, 249 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Warren, B. E., X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1969).Google Scholar
7Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., X-ray Diffraction Procedures (Wiley, New York, 1974), Chap. 9.Google Scholar
8Liu, D. R. and Williams, D. B., Scripta Metall. 22, 1361 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Doyle, P. A. and Turner, P. S., Acta Cryst. A24, 390 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Williams, D. B., in Aluminum-Lithium Alloys, edited by Sanders, T. H. Jr and Starke, E. A. (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, 1981), pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
11Whitman, C. E., M. S. Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School (1990).Google Scholar
12Jha, S. C., Sanders, T. H. Jr, and Dayananda, M. A., Acta Metall. 35, 473 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Niskanen, P., Sanders, T. H. Jr, Rinker, J. G., and Marek, M., Corr. Sci. 22, 283 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Sanders, T. H. Jr and Starke, E. A., in Aluminum-Lithium Alloys II, edited by Sanders, T. H. Jr and Starke, E. A. (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, 1984), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
15Sigli, C. and Sanchez, J. M., Acta Metall. 34, 1021 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Papazian, J. M., Sigli, C., and Sanchez, J. M., Scripta Metall. 20, 201 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Flower, H. M. and Gregson, P. J., Mater. Sci. Technol. 3, 287 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18de Fontaine, D., Acta Metall. 23, 553 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Khachaturyan, A. G., The Theory of Structural Transformations in Solids (Wiley, New York, 1983), pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
20Woychik, C. G., Rioja, R. J., Massalski, T. B., and Laughlin, D. E., Metall. Trans. A 16A, 1353 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Soffa, W. A. and Laughlin, D. E., Acta Metall. 37, 3019 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22McAllister, A. J., Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 3, 177 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar