Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:32:51.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phenomenological analysis of α′L-to-β martensitic transformation in phosphorus-bearing dicalcium silicate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. Fukuda
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Crystals of (Ca1.950.05) (Si0.9P0.1)O4, where □ denotes a vacancy, composed of both the α′L and β phases, were prepared and examined by the precession method. The β phase was exclusively twinned on (100)β, and the relative volumes of the twin-related variants were almost identical with each other. On the basis of the lattice correspondence between the two phases and their cell parameters, the phenomenological crystallographic theory was applied to determine the habit planes and the shape deformations upon α′L-to-β martensitic transformation. The habit planes, which define the coherent interphase boundaries between α′L and β, were nearly parallel to either (100)α′L or (010)α′L·. The alternate shape deformations that produce the former habit planes resulted in the actual (100) twin structure of the β phase. The total displacement was along [100]α′L with the magnitude of 0.008. Because the transformation involved a very small volumetric shrinkage of 0.6%, the strain accommodation would be almost completed. The coherency at the interface boundaries between the two phases and the effective strain accommodation probably caused the thermoelasticity of the Ca2SiO4 solid solutions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Fukuda, K., Maki, I., and Ito, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2925 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Fukuda, K., Maki, I., and Ito, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2969 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Wayman, C.W., in Physical Metallurgy: Phase Transformations, Nondiffusive, edited by Cahn, R. W. and Haasen, P. (Elsevier Science Publications, New York, 1983), pp. 1031, 1074.Google Scholar
4.Bowles, J. S. and Mackenzie, J. K., Acta Metall. 2, 129 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bowles, J. S. and Mackenzie, J. K., Acta Metall. 2, 138 (1954).Google Scholar
6.Wechsler, M.S., Lieberman, D. S., and Read, T. A., Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Eng. 197, 1503 (1953).Google Scholar
7.Bansal, G.K. and Heuer, A.H., Acta Metall. 22, 409 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kelly, P.M. and Ball, C. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, 259 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Schroeder, T.A. and Wayman, C. M., Acta Metall. 25, 1375 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Tas, H., Delaey, L., and Deruyttere, A., Metall. Trans. 4, 2833 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Delaey, L., in Phase Transformations in Materials: Diffusionless Transformations, edited by Hassen, P. (VCH, Berlin, Germany, 1991), pp. 339, 404.Google Scholar
12.Fukuda, K., Maki, I., Ito, S., and Miyake, T., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 105, 117 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Udagawa, S., Urabe, K., Yano, T., and Natsume, M., J. Ceram. Assoc. Jpn. 88, 285 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kim, Y.J., Nettleship, I., and Kriven, W. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 2407 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Jost, K.H., Ziemer, B., and Seydel, R., Acta Crystallogr. B33, 1696 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Saalfeld, H., Am. Mineral. 60, 824 (1975).Google Scholar
17.Fukuda, K., Maki, I., and Ito, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 1595 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Kelly, P.M., in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Martensitic Transformations: Martensitic Transformations in Ceramics, Sydney, Australia, 1989 (Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, 1990), Vols. 56–58, pp. 335346.Google Scholar
19.Bilby, E.C. and Christian, J. W., in The Mechanism of Phase Transformations in Metals: Martensitic Transformations (a symposium organized by the Institute of Metals and held at the Royal Institution, London, on Nov. 9, 1955. London; No. 18, 1955), p. 121.Google Scholar
20.Groves, G.W., Cem. Conc. Res. 12, 619 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Christian, J. W., The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1975).Google Scholar