Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:57:58.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanoindentation of silver-relations between hardness and dislocation structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

G. M. Pharr
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, Texas 77251
W. C. Oliver
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Get access

Abstract

The depth dependence of hardness in a well-annealed single crystal of silver has been characterized in nanoindentation experiments. The work is based on similar experiments performed by Chen and Hendrickson, but extends their results to indent depths on the nanometer scale. The hardness is generally found to increase with decreasing depth, with a rather sharp increase observed at depths of less than 50 nm. Using etch pitting to reveal the surface dislocation structure after indentation, the sharp rise in hardness is found to be associated with the disappearance of dislocation rosette patterns and any signs of near-surface dislocation activity, thereby suggesting that very small scale indentation plasticity may take place by nondislocation mechanisms. However, order of magnitude calculations show that possible alternatives, specifically, diffusional mechanisms, are too slow to make significant contributions. It is suggested that for very small indents, either the surface dislocation debris is quickly annealed out before it can be observed or indentation plasticity is accommodated entirely by subsurface dislocation activity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Pethica, J. B., Hutchings, R., and Oliver, W. C., Philos. Mag. A 48, 593 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Oliver, W. C., Hutchings, R., and Pethica, J. B., in ASTM STP 889, edited by Blau, P. J. and Lawn, B.R. (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1986), pp. 90108.Google Scholar
3Newey, D., Wilkens, M.A., and Pollock, H.M., J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 15, 119 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Stone, D., LaFontaine, W. R., Alexopoulos, P., Wu, T.-W., and Li, Che-Yu, J. Mater. Res. 3, 141 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Loubet, J., Georges, J. M., Marchesini, O., and Meille, G., J. Tribology 106, 43 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Shorshorov, M.Kh., Bulychev, S.I., and Alekhin, V. P., Sov. Phys. Dokl. 26, 769 (1982).Google Scholar
8Gane, N. and Cox, J. M., Philos. Mag. 22, 881 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Upit, G. P. and Varchenya, S. A., in The Science of Hardness Testing and Its Research Applications, edited by Westbrook, J. H. and Conrad, H. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973), pp. 135146.Google Scholar
10Ivan'ko, A. A., Handbook of Hardness Data, edited by Samsanov, G. V. (Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1971), p. 3.Google Scholar
11Chen, C.C. and Hendrickson, A. A., in The Science of Hardness Testing and Its Research Applications, edited by Westbrook, J. H. and Conrad, H. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973), pp. 274290.Google Scholar
12Chen, C.C. and Hendrickson, A. A., J. Appl. Phys. 42, 2208 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Chen, C.C. and Hendrickson, A. A., Metall. Trans. 2, 328 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Chu, S.N.G. and Li, J.C.M., J. Mater. Sci. 12, 2200 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Gall, V. V., Gruzin, P. L., and Yudina, G. Y., Fiz. Metall. Metalloved 30, 950 (1970).Google Scholar
16Tomizuka, C.T. and Sonder, E., Phys. Rev. 103, 11 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar