Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:33:55.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanoindentation of nanocrystalline ZnO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M.J. Mayo ,
R.W. Siegel ,
Y.X. Liao  and
W.D. Nix
M.J. Mayo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
R.W. Siegel
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Y.X. Liao
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
W.D. Nix
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Get access

Abstract

A number of nanocrystalline ceramics have been fabricated by the gas phase condensation technique. The mechanical properties of one of the first ceramics produced by this method, nanophase TiO2, have been discussed in an earlier study.1 This paper reports a similar study undertaken to examine the properties of nanocrystalline ZnO. Nanoindenter techniques are used to determine hardness, Young's modulus, and strain rate sensitivity in ultra-fine grained ZnO. Significant properties variations are experienced within a given sample, indicating a large degree of microstructural inhomogeneity. Nevertheless, a distinct evolution in properties can be observed as a function of sintering temperature. Young's modulus and hardness values increase almost linearly with increasing sintering temperature, and, in addition, there also appears to be a linear correlation between the development of the two materials properties. In contrast, strain rate sensitivity is shown to have an inverse dependence on sintering temperature. This dependence appears to be linked to the strong influence of grain size on strain rate sensitivity, so that the lower sintering temperatures, which provide the finer grain sizes, tend to promote strain rate sensitivity. The results of this study are strikingly similar to those obtained earlier for nanophase TiO2, and they indicate that the earlier results could probably be generalized to a much broader range of nanocrystalline ceramics.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 1992 , pp. 973 - 979
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Mayo, M.J., Siegel, R. W., Narayanasamy, A., and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1073 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Eastman, J. A., Liao, Y. X., Narayanasamy, A., and Siegel, R. W., in Processing Science of Advanced Ceramics, edited by Aksay, I. A., McVay, G. L., and Ulrich, D. R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 155, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989), p. 255.Google Scholar
3.Grimsditch, M.H. and Ramdas, A. K., Phys. Rev. B 11, 3139 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bhagavantam, S. and Bhimasenachar, J., Nature 154, 546 (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rice, R. W., in Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, edited by MacCrone, R. K. (Academic Press, New York, 1977), pp. 203–231.Google Scholar
6.Wachtman, J. B., Jr., in Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Ceramics, edited by Wachtman, J. B. (Washington, DC, National Bureau of Standards, 1969), p. 153.Google Scholar
7.Ibid., p. 147.Google Scholar
8.Pharr, G. M. and Cook, R. F., J. Mater. Res. 5, 847 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kingery, W. D., Bowen, H. K., and Uhlmann, D. R., Introduction to Ceramics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976), p. 714.Google Scholar
10.Mura, T., Yamashita, N., Mishima, T., and Hirose, Y., Int. J. Engng. Sci. 27, 1 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Tanaka, K., Koguchi, H., and Mura, T., Int. J. Engng. Sci. 27, 11 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lawn, B. R., Dabbs, T. P., and Fairbanks, C.J., J. Mater. Sci. 18, 2785 (1983).Google Scholar
13.Hagan, J.T., J. Mater. Sci. 15, 1417 (1980).Google Scholar
14.Ball, A. and Hutchinson, M.M., Met. Sci,. J. 3, 1 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Coble, R. L., J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1679 (1963).Google Scholar
16.Herring, C., J. Appl. Phys. 21, 437 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Wakai, F. and Kato, H., Adv. Ceram. Mater. 3, 71 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Wakai, F., Sakaguchi, S., and Matsuno, Y., Adv. Ceram. Mater. 1, 259 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Nieh, T. G., McNally, C. M., and Wadsworth, J., Scripta Metall. 22, 1297 (1988).Google Scholar
20.Nieh, T. G., McNally, C. M., and Wadsworth, J., Scripta Metall. 23, 457 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Hazzledine, P. M. and Motohashi, Y., in Superplasticity, edited by Baudelet, B. and Suery, M. (Paris, CNRS, 1985), pp. 1.1–1.15.Google Scholar
22.Maehara, Y. and Langdon, T.G., Mater. Sci. 25, 2275 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Hahn, H., Logas, J. C., Höfler, H.J., and Averback, R.S., in Clusters and Cluster-Assembled Materials, edited by Averback, R. S., Bernholc, J., and Nelson, D. L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 206, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991), p. 569.Google Scholar