Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:28:55.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanocrystalline coating enhanced ductility in a Zr-based bulk metallic glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Hongqi Li*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
Li Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
Cang Fan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
Hahn Choo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
Peter K. Liaw
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Compression tests were conducted on the as-cast Zr58Ni13.6Cu18Al10.4 metallic glass at room temperature. The effect of nanocrystalline Ni-15%Fe coating (mean grain size: ∼10 nm) on mechanical properties was investigated. The results demonstrate that the strength, elastic limit, Young’s modulus, and fracture geometry and morphology are not affected by this nanostructured coating. However, the compressive plastic strain increased noticeably when the specimens were coated with a layer of nanocrystal, which is attributed to the increased shear band density. The high shear band density is suggested to be due to the inhibition of shear band operation by nanocrystalline coating. The significance of this study is that a new strategy was developed to improve the ductility of bulk metallic glasses.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Johnson, W.L.: Bulk glass-forming metallic alloys: Science and technology. MRS Bull. 24, 42 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Inoue, A.: Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 48, 279 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Mukai, T., Nieh, T.G., Kawamura, Y., Inoue, A., and Higashi, K.: Effect of strain rate on compressive behavior of a Pd40Ni40P20 bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics 10, 1071 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Ponnambalam, V., Poon, S.J., and Shiflet, G.J.: Fe-based bulk metallic glasses with diameter thickness larger than one centimeter. J. Mater. Res. 19, 1320 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Wang, G.Y., Liaw, P.K., Peter, W.H., Yang, B., Freels, M., Yokoyama, Y., Benson, M.L., Green, B.A., Saleh, T.A., McDaniels, R.L., Steward, R.V., Buchanan, R.A., Liu, C.T., and Brooks, C.R.: Fatigue behavior and fracture morphology of Zr50Al10Cu40 and Zr50Al10Cu30Ni10 bulk-metallic glasses. Intermetallics 12, 1219 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Telford, M.: The case for bulk metallic glass. Mater. Today 7, 36 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Tregilgas, J.H.: Amorphous titanium aluminide hinge. Adv. Mater. Proc. 162, 40 (2004).Google Scholar
8Li, Q.K. and Li, M.: Effects of surface imperfections on deformation and failure of amorphous metals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 0319110 (2005).Google Scholar
9Eckert, J., Das, J., Kim, K.B., Baier, F., Tang, M.B., Wang, W.H., and Zhang, Z.F.: High strength ductile Cu-base metallic glass. Intermetallics 14, 876 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Schroers, J. and Johnson, W.L.: Ductile bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 255506 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Fan, C. and Inoue, A.: Ductility of bulk nanocrystalline composites and metallic glasses at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 46 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Lee, J-C., Kim, Y-C., Ahn, J-P., Kim, H-S., Lee, S-H., and Lee, B-J.: Deformation-induced nanocrystallization and its influence on work hardening in a bulk amorphous matrix composite. Acta Mater. 52, 1525 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Wada, T., Inoue, A., and Greer, A.L.: Enhancement of room-temperature plasticity in a bulk metallic glass by finely dispersed porosity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 251907 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Zhang, H., Liu, L.Z., Zhang, Z.F., Qiu, K.Q., Pan, X.F., Zhang, H.F., and Wang, Z.G.: Deformation and fracture behavior of tungsten fiber-reinforced bulk metallic glass composite subjected to transverse loading. J. Mater. Res. 21, 1375 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Fan, C., Li, H., Kecskes, L.J., Tao, K., Choo, H., Liaw, P.K., and Liu, C.T.: Mechanical behavior of bulk amorphous alloys reinforced by ductile particles at cryogenic temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 145506 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Li, H., Fan, C., Tao, K., Choo, H., and Liaw, P.K.: Compressive behavior of a Zr-based metallic glass at cryogenic temperatures. Adv. Mater. 18, 752 (2006).Google Scholar
17Argon, A.S.: Plastic deformation in metallic glasses. Acta Metall. 27, 47 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Huang, R., Suo, Z., Prevost, J.H., and Nix, W.D.: Inhomogeneous deformation in metallic glasses. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 50, 1011 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Spaepen, F.: A microscopic mechanism for steady state inhomogeneous flow in metallic glasses. Acta Metall. 25, 407 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Steif, P.S., Spaepen, F., and Hutchinson, J.W.: Strain localization in amorphous metals. Acta Metall. 30, 447 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Lewandowski, J.J., Wang, W.H., and Greer, A.L.: Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philos. Mag. Lett. 85, 77 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Li, H. and Ebrahimi, F.: Synthesis and characterization of electrodeposited nanocrystalline nickel-iron alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 347, 93 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Kimura, H. and Masumoto, T.: A model of the mechanics of serrated flow in an amorphous alloy. Acta Metall. 31, 231 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Wright, W.J., Saha, R., and Nix, W.D.: Deformation mechanisms of the Zr40Ti14Ni10Cu12Be24 bulk metallic glass. Mater. Trans. 42, 642 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Mukai, T., Nieh, T.G., Kawamura, Y., Inoue, A., and Higashi, K.: Dynamic response of a Pd40Ni40P20 bulk metallic glass in tension. Scripta Mater. 46, 43 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Jiang, W.H. and Atzmon, M.: Rate dependence of serrated flow in a metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 18, 755 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Lewandowski, J.J. and Lowhaphandu, P.: Effects of hydrostatic pressure on the flow and fracture of a bulk amorphous metal. Philos. Mag. A82, 3427 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Lu, J. and Ravichandran, G.: Pressure-dependent flow behavior of Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 18, 2039 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Needleman, A. and Tvergaard, V.: Analysis of a brittle-ductile transition under dynamic shear loading. Int. J. Solids Struct. 32, 2571 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Vaidyanathan, R., Dao, M., Ravichandran, G., and Suresh, S.: Study of mechanical deformation in bulk metallic glass through instrumented indentation. Acta Mater. 49, 3781 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar