Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rvxtl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T06:07:29.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical properties of biodegradable soy-protein plastics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

C.H. Schilling ,
T. Babcock ,
S. Wang  and
J. Jane
C.H. Schilling
Affiliation:
Ames Laboratory and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3110
T. Babcock
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Center for Crops Utilization Research, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3110
S. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Center for Crops Utilization Research, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3110
J. Jane
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Center for Crops Utilization Research, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-3110
Get access

Abstract

Experiments were performed to evaluate the room-temperature mechanical properties of soy-protein that were compression-molded with varying concentrations of glycerin plasticizer. Specimens exhibited stiff and brittle behavior with good tensile strength reliability based on Weibull statistics analysis. Raising the glycerin concentration from 0 to 20% progressively increased the tensile strain-to-failure from 1.1 to 1.8% and reduced the tensile strength from 42.1 to 23.6 MPa. the tangent modulus from 4.56 to 1.79 GPa, and the Rockwell hardness from R118.4 to R75.7. Ultrasonic measurements indicated that raising the glycerin concentration from 0 to 20% increased Poisson's ratio from 0.348 to 0.409 and reduced Young's modulus from 7.01 to 5.4 GPa and the shear modulus from 2.5 to 1.8 GPa. Significant increases in the tensile strength and the strength reliability resulted from eliminating Griffith's flaws by sieving the press powder before compression molding. Rockwell hardness rapidly decreased upon immersing these plastics in water at 25 °C, an effect which was pronounced for the glycerin-containing specimens.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 10 , Issue 9 , September 1995 , pp. 2197 - 2202
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1Johnson, L. A., Myers, D. J., and Burden, D. J., Inform 3 (3), 282–290 (March 1992).Google Scholar
2Paetau, I., M.Sc. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa (1993).Google Scholar
3Paetau, I., Chen, C-A., and Jane, J., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33, 1821–1827 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM D638, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, pp. 161–173.Google Scholar
5Turner, S., Mechanical Testing ofPlastics, 2nd ed. (Longman, New York, 1983), pp. 115–116.Google Scholar
6Dieter, G. E., Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986), pp. 246–249.Google Scholar
7Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM D785, Standard Test Method for Rockwell Hardness of Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials, pp. 257–261.Google Scholar
8Greene, R. E. Jr., Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, Ultrasonic Investigation of Mechanical Properties, Vol. 3 (Academic Press, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
9Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM D792, Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity (Relative Density) and Density of Plastics by Displacement, pp. 293–296.Google Scholar
10Shah, V., Handbook of Plastics Testing Technology (John Wiley, New York, 1984).Google Scholar