Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:53:32.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of the fracture toughness of CVD-grown ZnS using a miniaturized disk-bend test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jimin Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
Alan J. Ardell
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
Get access

Abstract

Novel apparatus and methodology have been developed for measuring the fracture toughness of ceramics using small disk-shaped samples 3 mm in diameter. The method involves the Vickers indentation of specimens ranging in thickness from 300 to 700 μm, and testing them in a ring-on-ring bending mode. Experiments on ZnS grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) have been used to evaluate the technique. The apparent fracture toughness of this material increases with crack length (R-curve behavior). This behavior is analyzed using established equations in conjunction with a new graphical method that obviates the need for measuring the apparent toughness of samples containing very large cracks. The fracture toughness at “infinite” crack length, 0.86 ± 0.08 MPa · m1/2, is in very good agreement with the values obtained by conventional methods. The effect of sample size on the accuracy of the results is thoroughly discussed. The thickness, t, of the sample should exceed by a factor of ten the initial crack length produced by the indentation. Also, since samples are tested at various indentation loads, P, the ratio of their thicknesses should be chosen to satisfy the condition tP2/3. The importance of several parameters in the design of the apparatus is also discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Anstis, G. R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B. R., and Marshall, D. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 533 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lucas, G. E., Metall. Trans. 21A, 1105 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Li, H., Chen, F. C., and Ardell, A. J., Metall. Trans. A (1991, in press).Google Scholar
4.Zhang, J., Chen, W. W., and Ardell, A. J., in Window and Dome Technologies and Materials II, edited by Klocek, P. (SPIE Proc., 1990), Vol. 1326, p. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Zhang, J., Chen, W. W., Ardell, A. J., and Dunn, B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1544 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Zhang, J., Chen, W. W., Dunn, B., and Ardell, A. J., in Ceramics and Inorganic Crystals' for Optics, Electro-Optics, and Nonlinear Conversion, edited by Schwartz, R. W. (SPIE Proc., 1988), Vol. 968, p. 35.Google Scholar
7.Chantikul, P., Anstis, G. R., Lawn, B. R., and Marshall, D. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 539 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Harris, D. C., Compton, W. R., Harper, A. M., Hayes, G. A., Hills, M. E., Jaeger, N. A., Sawyer, L. D., Scheri, R. C., and Stokes, J. L., in Window and Dome Technologies and Materials II, edited by Klocek, P. (SPIE Proc., 1990), Vol. 1326, p. 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Roarke, R. J. and Young, W. C., Formulas for Stress and Strain, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1975), p. 382.Google Scholar
10.Cook, R. F., Fairbanks, C. J., Lawn, B. R., and Mai, Y-W., J. Mater. Res. 2, 345 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Krause, R. F., Jr., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 338 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Shetty, D. K. and Wang, J-S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1158 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Cook, R. F. and Clarke, D. R., Acta Metall. 36, 555 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Cook, R. F., Lawn, B. R., and Fairbanks, C. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 68, 604 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Evans, A. G., in Advances in Ceramics, Science and Technology of Zirconia II, edited by Claussen, N., Rühle, M., and Heuer, A. H. (American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1984), Vol. 12, p. 193.Google Scholar
16.Newman, J. C. and Raju, I. S., Engr. Fract. Mech. 15, 185 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Adler, W. F. and Hooker, S. V., J. Mater. Sci. 13, 1015 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Williams, D. P. and Evans, A. G., J. Test. and Eval. 1, 264 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar