Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:38:06.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interfacial thermal fatigue behavior of cast tungsten carbide particle/steel matrix surface composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2019

Zulai Li ,
Donglan Zhang  and
Quan Shan Open the ORCID record for Quan Shan [Opens in a new window]
Zulai Li
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China; and National & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Advanced Metal Solidification Forming and Equipment Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, People’s Republic of China
Donglan Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China; and National & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Advanced Metal Solidification Forming and Equipment Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, People’s Republic of China
Quan Shan*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China; and National & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Advanced Metal Solidification Forming and Equipment Technology, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this study, cast tungsten carbide particle/steel matrix surface composites were fabricated using a vacuum evaporative pattern casting (V-EPC) infiltration process. Through thermal shock tests at 500 °C, the initiation and propagation of cracks at the interface of the composites were investigated. Owing to the mismatch in the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE), cracks tended to appear at the interface reaction zone (IRZ) between the particles and the matrix. Because there was also a difference in the CTE between the composite and the substrate, the cracks propagated rapidly along the transition layer (TL) between the composite and the substrate, and finally connected to form macro-cracks. Based on the stress analysis and calculation, the maximum thermal stress at the TL was 63.4 MPa, while the maximum thermal stress at the IRZ was 38 MPa. It could thus be inferred that the TL is the weak link under thermal fatigue. In addition, the experimental results were verified and found to be in good agreement with the calculations.

Keywords

particle-reinforced metal matrix compositescast tungsten carbideinterfacecrackthermal stress
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 34 , Issue 22 , 28 November 2019 , pp. 3837 - 3843
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ghosh, S.K. and Saha, P.: Crack and wear behavior of SiC particulate reinforced aluminium based metal matrix composite fabricated by direct metal laser sintering process. Mater. Des. 32, 139 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losch, K., Schuff, S., Balle, F., Beck, T., and Redenbach, C.: A stochastic microstructure model for particle reinforced aluminium matrix composites. J. Microsc. 273, 115 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Afkham, Y., Khosroshahi, R.A., Rahimpour, S., Aavani, C., Brabazon, D., and Mousavian, R.T.: Enhanced mechanical properties of in situ aluminium matrix composites reinforced by alumina nanoparticles. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 18, 215 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, T., Ertuğrul, O., Ciftci, N., Uhlenwinkel, V., Nielsch, K., and Scudino, S.: Effect of particle size ratio on microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum matrix composites reinforced with Zr48Cu36Ag8Al8 metallic glass particles. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 742, 517 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C., Ding, W., Yu, T., and Yang, C.: Materials removal mechanism in high-speed grinding of particulate reinforced titanium matrix composites. Precis. Eng. 51, 68 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, D., Hellman, J., Luhulima, D., Liimatainen, J., and Lindroos, V.K.: Interactions between tungsten carbide (WC) particulates and metal matrix in WC-reinforced composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 340, 155 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, L., Zhenhua, C., Ding, C., Cang, F., and Canrang, W.: Thermal fatigue behavior of Al–Si/SiCp composite synthesized by spray deposition. J. Alloys Compd. 504, S522 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.M.L. and Han, G.W.: Thermal fatigue behaviour of SiCp/Al composite synthesized by metal infiltration. Composites, Part A 37, 1858 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, L., Han, J., Yang, Z., Li, X., Wang, J., Li, Z., and Li, W.: Thermal fatigue crack behavior of SiCp/A356 composites prepared by stirring casting. Results Phys. 7, 927 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., Wu, S.C., Hu, Y.N., and Fu, Y.N.: Cracking evolution behaviors of lightweight materials based on in situ synchrotron X-ray tomography: A review. Front. Mech. Eng. 13, 461 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Li, L., and Tao, W.: Crack initiation and propagation behavior of WC particles reinforced Fe-based metal matrix composite produced by laser melting deposition. Opt. Laser Technol. 82, 170 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L., Lai, M.O., and Ng, C.W.: Enhanced mechanical properties of an Al based metal matrix composite prepared using mechanical alloying. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 252, 203 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, X.q., Song, X.f., Ren, H., Ma, J.g., Huang, M.p., and Zhang, C.j.: Microstructure and wear properties of tungsten carbide reinforced steel matrix composites. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 15, 1333 (2005).Google Scholar
Shorowordi, K.M., Laoui, T., Haseeb, A.S.M.A., Celis, J.P., and Froyen, L.: Microstructure and interface characteristics of B4C, SiC, and Al2O3 reinforced Al matrix composites: A comparative study. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 142, 738 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inem, G.P.B.: Interface structure and fractography of a magnesium-alloy, metal–matrix composite reinforced with SiC particles. J. Mater. Sci. 28, 4427 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, M., Jiang, Y., and Sui, Y.: Microstructure and properties of interfacial transition zone in ZTA particle–reinforced iron composites. Appl. Phys. A 125, 110 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Tao, J., Liu, Y., Bao, R., Li, F., Li, C., and Yi, J.: Interface interaction and synergistic strengthening behavior in pure copper matrix composites reinforced with functionalized carbon nanotube-graphene hybrids. Carbon 146, 736 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawla, N. and Ganesh, V.V.: Fatigue crack growth of SiC particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Int. J. Fatigue 32, 856 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippan, R., Flechsig, K., and Riemelmoser, F.O.: Fatigue crack propagation behavior in the vicinity of an interface between materials with different yield stresses. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 283, 225 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Jiang, Y., Zhou, R., Gao, F., Shan, Q., and Tan, J.: Thermal fatigue mechanism of WC particles reinforced steel substrate surface composite at different thermal shock temperatures. J. Alloys Compd. 596, 48 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, S., Zeng, X., Hu, Q., and Huang, Y.: Analysis of crack behavior for Ni-based WC composite coatings by laser cladding and crack-free realization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 1646 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y.C., Long, S.G., and Liu, Y.W.: Thermal failure mechanism and failure threshold of SiC particle reinforced metal matrix composites induced by laser beam. Mech. Mater. 35, 1003 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, R.S.: The mechanism of percussive wear of tungsten carbide composite. Wear 12, 309 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, L.S., Xu, Y.H., Yu, P., Liu, X.J., Ye, F.X., and Yan, H.H.: Microstructure and abrasive wear characteristics of in situ WC bundles-reinforced iron matrix composites. Adv. Mater. Res. 284–286, 265 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignat, S., Sallamand, P., Nichici, A., Vannes, B., Grevey, D., and Cicalã, E.: MoSi2 laser cladding—elaboration, characterisation and addition of non-stabilized ZrO2 powder particles. Intermetallics 11, 931 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D., Chen, Y., Li, L., and Li, F.: In situ investigation of fracture behavior in monocrystalline WCp-reinforced Ti–6Al–4V metal matrix composites produced by laser melt injection. Scr. Mater. 59, 91 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W-T., Meredith, C.H., Dickey, E.C., and Trice, R.: Growth and microstructure-dependent hardness of directionally solidified WC–W2C eutectoid ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98, 2191 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z., Jiang, Y., Zhou, R., Lu, D., and Zhou, R.: Dry three-body abrasive wear behavior of WC reinforced iron matrix surface composites produced by V-EPC infiltration casting process. Wear 262, 649 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar