Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:25:36.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial stability and mechanical properties of Al2O3 fiber reinforced Ti matrix composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Hsin-Fu Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0132
John C. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0132
Chien-Li Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0132
William W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0132
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of the interfaces in an Al2O3 fiber reinforced β-21S Ti alloy have been evaluated by using fiber pushout tests. The Al2O3 fibers were coated with a refractory metal and Y2O3 which served as a diffusion barrier during the HIPing used to produce the metal matrix composites. By doing fiber pushout tests, the interfacial fracture was found to occur at the interface between the refractory metal and the Y2O3. The interfacial shear strength and interfacial frictional stress were measured to be 323 and 312 ± 2 MPa, respectively. The interfacial frictional stress, which is due to asperity interlocking during the fiber sliding, was correlated to the surface roughness of the coated Al2O3 fiber obtained with the aid of an atomic force microscope. The measured surface roughness of 18.8 ± 2.2 nm was related to the frictional stress through Hutchinson's model.9 The frictional coefficient between the Al2O3 fiber and the Ti matrix is calculated to be 0.32 ± 0.02.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Yang, Y. M., Jeng, S. M., and Yang, C. J., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 138, 155 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Wadsworth, J. and Froes, F. H., J. Metals 41, 12 (1989).Google Scholar
3Yang, J. M. and Jeng, S. M., JOM 44, 52 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Gerberich, W. W., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 19, 71 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Evans, A. G., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 143, 63 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Marshall, D. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 259 (1984).Google Scholar
7Marshall, D. B. and Oliver, W. C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 542 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Carter, W. C., Butler, E. P., and Fuller, E. R., Scripta Metall. Mater. 25, 579 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Liang, C. and Hutchinson, J. W., Mech. Mater. 14, 207 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Wang, H. F., Gerberich, W. W., and Skowronek, C. J., Acta Metall. Mater. 41, 2425 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Clyne, T. W. and Watson, W. C., Comp. Sci. Technol. 42, 25 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Marshall, D. B., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 427 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Deve, H. E. (unpublished research), 3M Co., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
14Mackin, T. J., Warren, P. D., and Evans, A. G., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 1251 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar