Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:52:42.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instrumented indentation microscope applied to the elastoplastic indentation contact mechanics of coating/substrate composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. Sakai*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Toyohashi University of Technology, Tempaku-cho, Toyohashi 441-8580, Japan
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]This author was an editor of this journal during the review and decision stage. For the JMR policy on review and publication of manuscripts authored by editors, please refer to http://www.mrs.org/jmr_policy
Get access

Abstract

In instrumented indentation tests for a thin film coating on a substrate (film/substrate composite), it is well known that the substrate-affected contact area estimated through conventional approximations includes significant uncertainties, leading to a crucial difficulty in determining the elastic modulus and the contact hardness. To overcome this difficulty, an instrumented indentation microscope that enables researchers to make an in situ determination of the contact area is applied to an elastoplastic film on substrates having various values of their elastic moduli. Using the indentation microscope, the substrate-affected indentation contact parameters including contact hardness of the film/substrate composites are determined directly as well as quantitatively without any undesirable assumptions and approximations associated with the contact area estimate. The effect of a stiffer substrate on the contact profile of impression is significant, switching the profile from sinking in to piling up during penetration, and resulting in the substrate-affected contact hardness being highly enhanced at deeper penetrations. Through the present experimental study, it is demonstrated how efficient that instrumented indentation microscopy is in determining the substrate-affected elastoplastic contact parameters of film/substrate composite systems.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Doerner, M. and Nix, W.D.: A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation measurements. J. Mater. Res. 1(4), 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Bhattacharya, A.K. and Nix, W.D.: Analysis of elastic and plastic deformation associated with indentation testing of thin films on substrates. Int. J. Solids Struct. 24(12), 1287 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Chechenin, N.G., Bottiger, J., and Krog, J.P.: Nanoindentation of amorphous aluminum oxide films. I. The influence of the substrate on the plastic properties. Thin Solid Films 261, 219 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Wittling, M., Bendavid, A., Martin, P.J., and Swain, M.V.: Influence of thickness and substrate on the hardness and deformation of TiN films. Thin Solid Films 270, 283 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Tsui, T.Y. and Pharr, G.M.: Substrate effects on nanoindentation mechanical property measurement of soft films on hard substrates. J. Mater. Res. 14(1), 292 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Tsui, T.Y., Vlassak, J.J., and Nix, W.D.: Indentation plastic displacement field: Part I. The case of soft films on hard substrates. J. Mater. Res. 14(6), 2196 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Tsui, T.Y., Vlassak, J.J., and Nix, W.D.: Indentation plastic displacement field: Part II. The case of hard films on soft substrates. J. Mater. Res. 14(6), 2204 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Saha, R. and Nix, W.D.: Effects of the substrate on the determination of thin film mechanical properties by nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 50, 23 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Tsui, T.Y., Ross, C.A., and Pharr, G.M.: A method for making substrate-independent hardness measurements of soft metallic films on hard substrates by nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 18(6), 1383 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Hun, S.M., Saha, R., and Nix, W.D.: Determining hardness of thin films in elastically mismatched film-on-substrate systems using nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 54(6), 1571 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Pelletier, H., Krier, J., and Mille, P.: Characterization of mechanical properties of thin films using nanoindentation test. Mech. Mater. 38, 1182 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Oyen, M.L., Cook, R.F., Emerson, J.A., and Moody, N.R.: Indentation responses of time-dependent films on stiff substrates. J. Mater. Res. 19(8), 2487 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Zhang, C.Y., Zhang, Y.W., and Zeng, K.Y.: Extracting the mechanical properties of a viscoelastic polymeric film on a hard substrate. J. Mater. Res. 19(10), 3053 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Zhang, C.Y., Zhang, Y.W., Zeng, K.Y., Shen, L., and Wang, Y.Y.: Extracting the elastic and viscoelastic properties of a polymeric film using a sharp indentation relaxation test. J. Mater. Res. 21(12), 2991 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7(6), 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V.: A simple predictive model for spherical indentation. J. Mater. Res. 8(2), 297 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Miyajima, T. and Sakai, M.: Optical indentation microscope– A new family of instrumented indentation testing. Philos. Mag. 86(11), 5729 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Sakai, M., Hakiri, N., and Miyajima, T.: Instrumented indentation microscope: A powerful tool for the mechanical characterization in microscales. J. Mater. Res. 21(9), 2298 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Pelletier, C.G.N., Den Toonder, J.M.J., Govaert, L.E., Hakiri, N., and Sakai, M.: Quantitative assessment and prediction of contact area development during spherical tip indentation of glassy polymers. Philos. Mag. 88(9), 1291 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Brinker, C.J. and Scherer, G.W.: Sol-Gel Science (Academic Press, San Diego, 1990).Google Scholar
21Matsuda, A.: Sol-gel micropatterning, in Application of Sol-Gel Technology, Vol. III, edited by Sakka, S. (Kluwer Academic Publications, Boston, 2004), Chap. 30.Google Scholar
22Zhang, J.Q., Matsuda, A., Muto, H., and Sakai, M.: Mechanical properties of sol-gel inorganic-organic hybrid films in nanoindentation. Key Eng. Mater. 317–318, 317 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Pharr, G.M., Oliver, W.C., and Brotzen, F.R.: On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation. J. Mater. Res. 7(3), 613 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Yu, H.Y., Sanday, S.C., and Rath, B.B.: The effect of substrate on the elastic properties of films determined by the indentation test-axisymmetric Boussinesq problem. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 38(6), 745 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Sakai, M., Zhang, J., and Matsuda, A.: Elastic deformation of coating/substrate composites in axisymmetric indentation. J. Mater. Res. 20(8), 2173 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Sakai, M.: Substrate-affected contact deformation and hardness of elastoplastic film coated on elastic substrate. Thin Solid Films (submitted).Google Scholar
27Sakai, M.: Substrate-affected indentation contact parameters of elastoplastic coating/substrate composites. J. Mater. Res. 24(3), 831 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Chen, X. and Vlassak, J.J.: Numerical study on the measurement of thin film mechanical properties by means of nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 16(10), 2974 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Sakai, M. and Nakano, Y.: Elastoplastic load-depth hysteresis in pyramidal indentation. J. Mater. Res. 17(8), 2161 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Sakai, M., Akatsu, T., and Numata, S.: Finite element analysis for conical indentation unloading of elastoplastic materials with strain hardening. Acta Mater. 52, 2359 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Zhang, J.Q. and Sakai, M.: Geometrical effect of pyramidal indenters on the elastoplastic contact behaviors of ceramics and metals. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 381, 62 (2004).Google Scholar
32Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part II. Finite element simulations. J. Mater. Res. 11(3), 760 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Xu, Z.H. and Li, X.: Influence of equi-biaxial residual stress on unloading behavior of nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 53, 1913 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Chen, X., Yan, J., and Karlsson, A.M.: On the determination of residual stress and mechanical properties by indentation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 416, 139 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar