Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:34:02.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of the external stress on the electromechanical response of electrostrictive 0.9Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3−0.1PbTiO3 in the dc electrical field-biased state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. Zhao
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory and Electrical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Volkmar Mueller
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory and Electrical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Q. M. Zhang*
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory and Electrical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.
Get access

Abstract

The influence of uniaxial compressive stress, T3, applied parallel to the electrical field, on the electromechanical parameters of 0.9Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3−0.1PbTiO3 ceramics in the dc electrical field-biased state and at temperatures near the dielectric constant maximum Tm was investigated. It was found that T3 reduces both the dielectric constant and polarization level, which results in a reduction of the piezoelectric coefficient with stress. However, the compliance of the material does not show much change with stress. As a consequence, the coupling factor k33 is also reduced with stress. On the other hand, the existence of the local micropolar region in the material causes anomalous changes in the aforementioned properties when the material is subjected to a high electric field, which induces a macropolar state. The transformation of this macropolar state back to a micropolar state under stress involves a large volume strain and results in an enhancement of the hydrostatic piezoelectric response.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Cross, L.E., Ferroelectrics 76, 241267 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Zhang, Q. M. and Zhao, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 (12), 16491651 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Zhao, J., Glazounov, A. E., and Zhang, Q. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. (1998, in press).Google Scholar
4.Zhang, Q. M., Wang, H., Kim, N., and Cross, L. E., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 454 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Zhang, Q. M., Zhao, J., Uchino, K., and Zheng, J., J. Mater. Res. 12, 226234 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Zhao, J., Zhang, Q. M., Kim, N., and Shrout, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34 (10), 56585663 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pilgrim, S. M., Massuda, M., Prodey, J. D., and Ritter, A. P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75 (7), 19641969 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hom, C. L., Pilgrim, S. M., Shankar, N., Bridger, K., Massuda, M., and Winzer, S. R., IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Freq. Cont. 41 (4), 542551 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Swartz, S. L. and Shrout, T. R., Mater. Res. Bull. 17, 12451250 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity, IEEE, Ultrason., Ferroelect., and Freq. Contr. Soc., ANSI/IEEE Std. 176–1897 (1987).Google Scholar
11.Sundar, V. and Newnham, R. E., Ferroelectrics 135, 431446 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Zhang, Q.M., Pan, W. Y., Jang, S. J., and Cross, L. E., Ferroelectrics, 88, 147154 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Samara, G.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 314317 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Cao, H. and Evans, A.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (4), 890896 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Viehland, D.D., Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (1991).Google Scholar
16.Wang, H., Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (1994).Google Scholar