Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:12:58.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of fine ferrite formation on the γ/α interface, fine bainite and retained austenite in a thermomechanically-processed transformation induced plasticity steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2016

Ilana B. Timokhina ,
Michael K. Miller ,
Hossein Beladi  and
Peter D. Hodgson
Ilana B. Timokhina*
Affiliation:
Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia
Michael K. Miller
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6139, USA
Hossein Beladi
Affiliation:
Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia
Peter D. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3217, Australia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An Fe–0.26C–1.96Si–2Mn with 0.31Mo (wt%) steel was subjected to a novel thermomechanical processing route to produce fine ferrite with different volume fractions, bainite, and retained austenite. Two types of fine ferrites were found to be: (i) formed along prior austenite grain boundaries, and (ii) formed intragranularly in the interior of austenite grains. An increase in the volume fraction of fine ferrite led to the preferential formation of blocky retained austenite with low stability, and to a decrease in the volume fraction of bainite with stable layers of retained austenite. The difference in the morphology of the bainitic ferrite and the retained austenite after different isothermal ferrite times was found to be responsible for the deterioration of the mechanical properties. The segregation of Mn, Mo, and C at distances of 2–2.5 nm from the ferrite and retained austenite/martensite interface on the retained austenite/martensite site was observed after 2700 s of isothermal hold. It was suggested that the segregation occurred during the austenite-to-ferrite transformation, and that this would decrease the interface mobility, which affects the austenite-to-ferrite transformation and ferrite grain size.

Keywords

fine ferritefine bainiteretained austeniteγ/α interfaceatom probe tomographytransmission electron microscopy
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , 28 March 2016 , pp. 806 - 818
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hodgson, P.D.: The evolution of ferrite grain size in structural steels. Mater. Forum 23, 105 (1999).Google Scholar
Beladi, H., Kelly, G.L., and Hodgson, P.D.: Ultrafine grained structure formation in steels using dynamic strain induced transformation processing. Int. Mater. Rev. 52, 14 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.: Large chunks of very strong steel. Mater. Sci. Technol. 21, 1293 (2005).Google Scholar
Caballero, F.G. and Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.: Very strong bainite. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 8, 251 (2004).Google Scholar
Timokhina, I.B., Beladi, H., Xiong, X., Adachi, Y., and Hodgson, P.D.: Nanoscale microstructural characterization of a nanobainitic steel. Acta Mater. 59, 5511 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zackay, V.F., Parker, E.R., Fahr, D., and Bush, R.: The enhancement of ductility in high strength steels. Trans. ASM 60, 252 (1967).Google Scholar
Speich, G.R., Demarest, V.A., and Miller, R.L.: Formation of austenite during intercritical annealing of DP steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. 12, 1419 (1981).Google Scholar
Gerberich, W.W., Hemmings, P.L., Merz, M.D., and Zackay, V.F.: Preliminary toughness results on TRIP steels. Trans. ASM 61, 843 (1968).Google Scholar
Ludwigson, D.C. and Berger, J.A.: Plastic behaviour metastable austenitic stainless steels. J. Iron Steel Inst. 207, 63 (1969).Google Scholar
Antolovich, S.D.: Fracture toughness and strain-induced phase transformation. Metall. Soc. AIME Trans. 242, 2371 (1968).Google Scholar
Antolovich, S.D. and Singh, S.: On the toughness increment associated with the austenite to martensite phase transformation. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2, 2135 (1971).Google Scholar
Tamura, I.: Deformation-induced martensitic transformation and transformation-induced plasticity in steels. Metal Sci. 16, 245 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhandarkar, V.F., Zackay, V.F., and Parker, E.R.: Stability and mechanical properties of some metastable austenitic steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. 3, 2619 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecroisey, F. and Pineau, A.: Martensitic transformations induced by plastic deformation in the Fe–Ni–Cr–C system. Metall. Mater. Trans. 3, 387 (1972).Google Scholar
Olson, B.G. and Cohen, M.: Kinetics of strain-induced martensitic nucleation. Metall. Mater. Trans. 6, 791 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, B.G. and Cohen, M.: Stressed-assisted isothermal martensitic transformation: Application to TRIP steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. 13, 1907 (1982).Google Scholar
Krauss, G.: Deformation and fracture in martensitic carbon steels tempered at low temperature. Metall. Mater. Trans. 32, 205 (2001).Google Scholar
Toji, Y., Matsuda, H., Herbig, M., Choi, P.P., and Raabe, D.: Atomic-scale analysis of carbon partitioning between martensite and austenite by atom probe tomography and correlative transmission electron microscopy. Acta Mater. 65, 215 (2014).Google Scholar
Wang, M.M., Tasan, C.C., Ponge, D., Dippel, A.C., and Raabe, D.: Nonalaminate transformation-induced plasticity-twinning induced plasticity steel with dynamic strain partitioning and enhanced damage resistance. Acta Mater. 85, 216 (2015).Google Scholar
Zhu, K., Chen, H., Masse, J.P., Bouaziz, O., and Gachet, G.: The effect of prior ferrite formation on bainite and martensite transformation kinetics in advanced high-strength steels. Acta Mater. 61, 6025 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterschoot, T., De, A.K., Vandeputte, S., and De Cooman, B.C.: Static strain aging phenomena in cold-rolled dual-phase steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. 34, 781 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timokhina, I.B., Hodgson, P.D., and Pereloma, E.V.: Transmission electron microscopy characterization of the bake-hardening behaviour of the transformation induced plasticity and dual phase steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. 38, 2442 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akben, M.G., Bacroix, B., and Jonas, J.J.: Effect of vanadium and molybdenum addition on high temperature recovery, recrystallisation and precipitation behaviour of niobium-based microalloyed steels. Acta Metall. 31, 161 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wada, T., Wada, H., Elliot, J.F., and Chipman, J.: Activity of carbon and solubility of carbides in the FCC Fe–Mo–C, Fe–Cr–C and Fe–V–C alloys. Metall. Trans. 3, 2856 (1972).Google Scholar
Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.: Bainite in Steels, 2nd ed. (IOM Communications Ltd; The Institute of Materials, London; Cambridge, 2001); p. 454.Google Scholar
Li, M.V., Niebuhr, D.V., Meekisho, L.L., and Atteridge, D.G.: A computational model for the prediction of steel hardenability. Metall. Mater. Trans. 29, 661 (1998).Google Scholar
Andrews, K.W.: Empirical formulae for the calculation of some transformation temperatures. J. Iron Steel Inst. July, 721 (1965).Google Scholar
Grange, R.A.: Estimating the hardenability of carbon steels. Metall. Trans. 4, 2231 (1973).Google Scholar
Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.: Theoretical analysis of changes in cementite composition during the tempering of bainite. Mater. Sci. Technol. 5, 131 (1989).Google Scholar
Song, R., Ponge, D., and Raabe, D.: Influence of Mn Content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultrafine grained C–Mn steels. ISIJ Int. 45, 1721 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcagnotto, M., Pongo, D., and Raabe, D.: On the effect of Mn on grain size stability and hardenability in ultrafine-grained ferrite/martensite dual-phase steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. 43, 37 (2012).Google Scholar
Beladi, H., Timokhina, I.B., Xiong, X.Y., and Hodgson, P.D.: A novel thermomechanical approach to produce a fine ferrite and low-temperature bainitic composite microstructure. Acta Mater. 61, 7240 (2013).Google Scholar
Adachi, Y., Wakita, M., Beladi, H., and Hodgson, P.D.: The formation of ultrafine ferrite through static transformation in low carbon steels. Acta Mater. 55, 4925 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eghbali, B., Abdollah-Zadeh, A., Beladi, H., and Hodgson, P.D.: Characterization on ferrite microstructure evolution during large strain warm torsion testing of plain low carbon steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 435–436, 499 (2006).Google Scholar
Beladi, H., Timokhina, I.B., Mukherjee, S., and Hodgson, P.D.: Ultrafine ferrite formation through isothermal static phase transformation. Acta Mater. 59, 4186 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timokhina, I.B., Pereloma, E.V., and Hodgson, P.D.: Effect of microstructure on the stability of retained austenite in transformation-induced-plasticity steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. 35, 2331 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y.F., Qiu, L.N., Sun, X., Zuo, L., Liaw, P.K., and Raabe, D.: Effcts of retained austenite volume fraction, morphology and carbon content on strength and ductility of nanostructured TRIP assisted steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. 636, 551 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seol, J.B., Raabe, D., Choi, P.P., Im, Y.R., and Park, C.G.: Atomic scale effects of alloying, partitioning, solute drag and austempering on the mechanical properties of high-carbon bainitic-austenitic TRIP steels. Acta Mater. 60, 6183 (2012).Google Scholar
Dmitrieva, O., Ponge, D., Inden, G., Millan, J., Choi, P., Sietsma, J., and Raabe, D.: Chemical gradient across phase boundaries between martensite and austenite in steel studied by atom probe tomography and simulation. Acta Mater. 59, 364 (2011).Google Scholar
Caballero, F.G., Miller, M.K., Babu, S.S., and Garcia-Mateo, C.: Atomic scale observations of bainite transformation in a high carbon high silicon steel. Acta Mater. 55, 381 (2007).Google Scholar
Ryde, L.: Application of EBSD to analysis of microstructures in commercial steels. Mater. Sci. Technol. 22, 1297 (2006).Google Scholar
Petrov, R., Kestens, L., Wasilkowska, A., and Houbaert, Y.: Microstructure and texture of a lightly deformed TRIP-assisted steel characterized by means of the EBSD technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. 447, 285–297 (2007).Google Scholar
Zaefferer, S., Romano, P., and Friedel, F.: EBSD as a tool to identify and quantify bainite and ferrite in low-alloyed Al-TRIP steels. J. Microsc. 230, 499–508 (2008).Google Scholar
Cullity, B.D.: Elements of X-Ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1978); p. 555.Google Scholar
Miller, M.K.: Atom Probe Tomography (Springer, New York, 2000).Google Scholar
Tsuzaki, K., Kodai, A., and Maki, T.: Formation mechanism of bainitic ferrite in an Fe-2 PctSi-0.6 pct C alloy. Metall. Mater. Trans. 25, 2009 (1994).Google Scholar
Sandvik, B.P.J.: The bainite reaction in Fe-Si-c alloys: Secondary stage. Metall. Trans. 13, 789 (1982).Google Scholar
Malet, L., Barnett, M.R., Jacques, P.J., and Godet, S.: Variant selection during the γ-to-αb phase transformation in hot-rolled bainitic TRIP-aided steels. Scr. Mater. 61, 520 (2009).Google Scholar
Gong, W., Tomota, Y., Koo, M.S., and Adachi, Y.: Effect of ausforming on nanobainite steel. Scr. Mater. 63, 819 (2010).Google Scholar
Quidort, D. and Brechet, Y.J.M.: Isothermal growth kinetics of bainite in 0.5% C steels. Acta Metall. 49, 4161 (2001).Google Scholar
Hashimoto, S., Sudo, M., Mimura, K., and Hosoda, T.: Effect of microstructure on mechanical properties of C-Mn high strength hot rolled sheet steel. Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 26, 985 (1986).Google Scholar
Gilmour, J.B., Purdy, G.R., and Kirdalky, J.S.: Partition of Mn during the proeutectoid ferrite transformation in steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. 3, 3213 (1972).Google Scholar
Wada, T., Wada, H., Elliott, J.F., and Chipman, J.: Thermodynamics of the FCC Fe–Mn–C and Fe–Si–C alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. 3, 1657 (1972).Google Scholar
Bradley, J.R. and Aaronson, H.I.: Growth kinetics of grain boundary ferrite allotrimorphs in Fe–C–X alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. 12, 1729 (1981).Google Scholar
Capdevila, C., Cornide, J., Tanaka, K., Nakanishi, K., and Urones-Garrote, E.: Kinetic transition during ferrite growth in Fe–C–Mn medium carbon steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. 42, 3719 (2011).Google Scholar
Guo, H., Purdy, G.R., Enomoto, M., and Aaronson, H.I.: Kinetic transitions and substitutional solute (Mn) fields associated with later stages of ferrite growth in Fe–C–Mn–Si. Metall. Mater. Trans. 37, 1721 (2006).Google Scholar
Zurob, H.S., Hutchinson, C.R., Béhé, A., Purdy, G.R., and Bréchet, Y.J.M.: A transition from local equilibrium to paraequilibrium kinetics for ferrite growth in Fe–C–Mn: A possible role of interfacial segregation. Acta Mater. 56, 2203 (2008).Google Scholar
Thuillier, O., Danoix, F., Gounbé, M., and Blavette, D.: Atom probe tomography of the austenite–ferrite interphase boundary composition in a model alloy Fe–C–Mn. Scr. Mater. 55, 1071 (2006).Google Scholar
Guo, H., Yang, S.W., Shang, C.J., Wang, X.M., and He, X.L.: A quantitative analysis of Mn segregation at partitioned ferrite/austenite interface in a Fe-C-Mn-Si alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 25, 383 (2009).Google Scholar
Bouet, M., Fillipine, R., Essadiqi, E., Root, J., and Yue, S.: The effect of Mo in Si–Mn Nb bearing TRIP steels. Mater. Sci. Forum 284, 319 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, E.S., Fletcher, H.A., Hutchins, J.D., Garratt-Reed, A.J., Reynolds, W.T. Jr., Aaronson, H.I., Purdy, G.R., and Smith, G.D.W.: Molybdenum accumulation at ferrite: Austenite interfaces during isothermal transformation of an Fe-0.24 pct C-0.93 pct Mo alloy. Metall. Trans. 35, 1223 (2004).Google Scholar
Fridberg, J., Torndahl, L.E., and Hillert, M.: Diffusion in iron. Jernkont. Ann. 153, 263 (1969).Google Scholar