Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:00:27.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infiltration pressure of a nanoporous liquid spring modified by an electrolyte

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

A. Han  and
Y. Qiao
A. Han
Affiliation:
Department of Structural Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0085
Y. Qiao*
Affiliation:
Department of Structural Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0085
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In a hydrophobic zeolite, the infiltration and defiltration of water can be controlled by adjusting external pressure, and therefore the system behaves as a “liquid spring.” Since the hysteresis of sorption isotherm is negligible and the working pressure is thermally controllable, volume memory devices can be developed based on this phenomenon. With the addition of sodium chloride, both infiltration and defiltration pressures increase, which should be attributed to the cation exchange. The temperature sensitivity of the system increases with the electrolyte concentration, beneficial to improving the output energy density.

Keywords

FluidicsInfiltration (chemical reaction)Nanostructure
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , March 2007 , pp. 644 - 648
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Culshaw, B.: Smart Structures and Materials (Artech House Publ., Norwood, MA, 1996).Google Scholar
2Wei, Z.G., Sandstrom, R., and Miyazaki, S.: Shape memory materials and hybrid composites for smart systems. J. Mater. Sci. 33, 3743 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Kong, X. and Qiao, Y.: An electrically controllable nanoporous smart system. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 064313 (2006).Google Scholar
4Laouir, A., Luo, L., Tondeur, D., Cachot, T., and Goff, P. Le: Thermal machines based on surface enrgy of wetting—Thermodynamic analysis. AIChE J. 49, 764 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Soulard, M., Patarin, J., Eroshenko, V., and Regis, R.: Molecular spring and bumper—A new application for hydrophobic zeolitic materials. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 154, 1830 (2004).Google Scholar
6Qiao, Y., Punyamurtula, V.K., Han, A., Kong, X., and Surani, F.B.: Temperature dependence of working pressure of a nanoporous liquid spring. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 251905 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Surani, F.B. and Qiao, Y.: Infiltration and defiltraion of an electrolyte solution in nanopores. J. Appl. Phys 100, 034311 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Surani, F.B. and Qiao, Y.: Pressure induced infiltration of an epsomite-silica system. Philos. Mag. Lett. 86, 253 (2006).Google Scholar
9Surani, F.B., Kong, X., and Qiao, Y.: Energy absorption of a nanoporous system subjected to dynamics loadings. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 163111 (2005).Google Scholar
10Han, A. and Qiao, Y.: Pressure induced infiltration of aqueous solutions of multiple promoters in a nanoporous silica. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10348 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Surani, F.B. and Qiao, Y.: Energy absorption of a polyacrylic acid partial sodium salt modified nanoporous sytem. J. Mater. Res. 21, 1327 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Punyamurtula, V.K., Han, A., and Qiao, Y.: Damping properties of nanoporous carbon-cyclohexane mixtures. Adv. Eng. Mater (in press).Google Scholar
13Auerbach, S.M., Carrado, K.A., and Dutta, P.K.: Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Han, A., Kong, X., and Qiao, Y.: Pressure induced infiltration in nanopores. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 014308 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Hussain, I. and Titiloye, J.O.: Molecular dynamics simulations of the adsorption and diffusion behavior of pure and mixed alkanes in silicalite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 85, 143 (2005).Google Scholar
16Maginn, E.J., Bell, A.T., and Theodorou, D.N.: Transport diffusivity of methane in silicalite from equilibrium and nonequilibrium simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 4173 (1993).Google Scholar
17Beauvais, C.E., Boutin, A., and Fuchs, A.H.: Adsorption of water in zeolite sodium-faujasite: A molecular simulation study. C.R. Chimie. 8, 485 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Desbiens, N., Demachy, I., and Fuchs, A.H.: Water condensation in hydrophobic nanopores. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44, 5310 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Desbiens, N., Boutin, A., and Demachy, I.: Water condensation in hydrophobic silicalite-1 zeolite: A molecular simulation study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 109, 24071 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Coasne, B. and Gubbins, K.E.: Temperature effect on adsorption/desorption isotherms for a simple fluid confined within various nanopores. Adsorption J. Int. Adsorption Soc. 11(Suppl. 1), 289 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Demontis, P., Stara, G., and Suffritti, G.B.: Behavior of water in the hydrophobic zeolite silicalite at different temperatures. A molecular dynamics study. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 4426 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Kong, X. and Qiao, Y.: Improvement of recoverability of a nanoporous energy absorption system by using chemical admixture. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 151919 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Jacobs, P.A. and von Bellmoos, R.: Framework hydroxyl groups of H-ZSM-5 zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. 86, 3050 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24van Santen, R.A. and Kramer, G.J.: Reactivity theory of zeolitic brarnsted acidic sites. Chem. Rev. 95, 637 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Kucherov, A.V. and Slinkin, A.A.: Solid-state reaction as a way to transition-metal cation introduction into high-silica zeolites. J. Mol. Catal. 90, 323 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Ribeiro, F.R.: Zeolites–Science and Technology (Springer, New York, 2002).Google Scholar