Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:02:03.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Governing role of the ratio of large platelet particles to ultrafine particles on dynamic and quasistatic compressive response and damage evolution in ice-templated alumina ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2020

Mahesh Banda
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia23529, USA
Sashanka Akurati
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia23529, USA
Dipankar Ghosh*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia23529, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study revealed that the mass ratio of large anisometric particles (platelets) to ultrafine, equiaxed particles strongly influences dynamic and quasistatic compressive response and the process of damage evolution in ice-templated alumina materials. The improved sinterability between particles of significantly dissimilar size and morphology enabled the utilization of a high mass ratio of the particles in harnessing a markedly enhanced level of strength in highly porous ice-templated ceramics. The high volume fraction of platelets increased lamellar bridge density and resulted in dendritic morphology as opposed to lamellar morphology without platelets. All the materials showed strain rate-sensitivity, where strength increased with strain rate. Materials with highly dendritic morphology exhibited the best performance in terms of maximum strength and energy absorption capacity, and the performance improved from quasistatic to dynamic regime. Direct observation of the process of damage evolution revealed the effects of both strain rate and ratio of platelets to ultrafine particles.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Scotti, K.L. and Dunand, D.C.: Freeze casting – a review of processing, microstructure and properties via the open data repository, FreezeCasting.net. Prog. Mater. Sci. 94, 243 (2018).Google Scholar
Shao, G., Hanaor, D.A.H., Shen, X., and Gurlo, A.: Freeze casting: From low-dimensional building blocks to aligned porous structures – a review of novel materials, methods, and applications. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907176 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naviroj, M., Voorhees, P.W., and Faber, K.T.: Suspension- and solution-based freeze casting for porous ceramics. J. Mater. Res. 32, 3203 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deville, S.: Ice-templating, freeze casting: Beyond materials processing. J. Mater. Res. 28, 2202 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouville, F., Maire, E., and Deville, S.: Lightweight and stiff cellular ceramic structures by ice templating. J. Mater. Res. 29, 175 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, I. and Naleway, S.E.: Intrinsic and extrinsic control of freeze casting. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8, 2372 (2019).Google Scholar
Ghosh, D., Kang, H., Banda, M., and Kamaha, V.: Influence of anisotropic grains (platelets) on the microstructure and uniaxial compressive response of ice-templated sintered alumina scaffolds. Acta Mater. 125, 1 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, D., Dhavale, N., Banda, M., and Kang, H.: A comparison of microstructure and uniaxial compressive response of ice-templated alumina scaffolds fabricated from two different particle sizes. Ceram. Int. 42, 16138 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deville, S., Saiz, E., Nalla, R.K., and Tomsia, A.P.: Freezing as a path to build complex composites. Science 311, 515 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lichtner, A., Roussel, D., Jauffrès, D., Martin, C.L., and Bordia, R.K.: Effect of macropore anisotropy on the mechanical response of hierarchically porous ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99, 979 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akurati, S., Ghosh, D., Banda, M., and Terrones, D.: Direct observation of failure in ice-templated ceramics under dynamic and quasistatic compressive loading conditions. J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. 5, 463 (2019).Google Scholar
Banda, M. and Ghosh, D.: Effects of porosity and strain rate on the uniaxial compressive response of ice-templated sintered macroporous alumina. Acta Mater. 149, 179 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parai, R., Walters, T., Marin, J., Pagola, S., Koenig, G.M. Jr., and Ghosh, D.: Strength enhancement in ice-templated lithium titanate Li4Ti5O12 materials using sucrose. Materialia 14, 100901 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akurati, S., Marin, J., Gundrati, B., and Ghosh, D.: Assessing the role of loading direction on the uniaxial compressive response of multilayered ice-templated alumina-epoxy composites. Materialia 14, 100895 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M.M., Imperio, R., Wen, M., Meyers, M.A., and McKittrick, J.: Bioinspired scaffolds with varying pore architectures and mechanical properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 1978 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, D., Banda, M., Kang, H., and Dhavale, N.: Platelets-induced stiffening and strengthening of ice-templated highly porous alumina scaffolds. Scr. Mater. 125, 29 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozer, I., Suvaci, E., Karademir, B., Missiaen, J., Carry, C., and Bouvard, D.: Anisotropic sintering shrinkage in alumina ceramics containing oriented platelets. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 1972 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradt, R.C., Hasselman, D., Munz, D., Sakai, M., and Shevchenko, V.Y.: Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics (Springer Science & Business Media, Inc., New York, NY, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankford, J.: Mechanisms responsible for strain-rate-dependent compressive strength in ceramic materials. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, C-33 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankford, J., Predebon, W., Staehler, J., Subhash, G., Pletka, B., and Anderson, C.: The role of plasticity as a limiting factor in the compressive failure of high strength ceramics. Mech. Mater. 29, 205 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, D., Banda, M., John, J.E., and Terrones, D.A.: Dynamic strength enhancement and strain rate sensitivity in ice-templated ceramics processed with and without anisometric particles. Scr. Mater. 154, 236 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asthana, R. and Tewari, S.N.: Review – the engulfment of foreign particles by a freezing interface. J. Mater. Sci. 28, 5414 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körber, C. and Rau, G.: Interaction of particles and a moving ice-liquid interface. J. Crys. Growth 72, 649 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naglieri, V., Bale, H.A., Gludovatz, B., Tomsia, A.P., and Ritchie, R.O.: On the development of ice-templated silicon carbide scaffolds for nature-inspired structural materials. Acta Mater. 61, 6948 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banda, M. and Ghosh, D.: Effects of temperature and platelets on lamella wall microstructure, structural stability, and compressive strength in ice-templated ceramics. Materialia 9, 100537 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravichandran, G. and Subhash, G.: Critical appraisal of limiting strain rates for compression testing of ceramics in a split Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Am. Ceram. Soc 77, 263 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subhash, G. and Ravichandran, G.: Split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing of ceramics. In ASM Handbook Volume 8 – Mechanical Testing and Evaluation (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 2000); pp. 497.Google Scholar
Li, L., Li, Z., Li, X., Xu, X., Guo, A., Liu, J., and Du, H.: Influence of fibers on the microstructure and compressive response of directional ice-templated alumina ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram 38, 3595 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, M.D., Peroni, M., Solomos, G., Mondal, D.P., Matsagar, V.A., Gupta, A.K., Larcher, M., and Marburg, S.: Dynamic compression behavior of cenosphere aluminum alloy syntactic foam. Mater. Des 42, 418 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dou, Z.Y., Jiang, L.T., Wu, G.H., Zhang, Q., Xiu, Z.Y., and Chen, G.Q.: High strain rate compression of cenosphere-pure aluminum syntactic foams. Scr. Mater 57, 945 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, D., Wiest, A., and Conner, R.D.: Uniaxial quasistatic and dynamic compressive response of foams made from hollow glass microspheres. J. Eur. Ceram 36, 781 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A. and Ramamurty, U.: Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 281, 1 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D.K., O'Dwyer, J.G., Davis, G.R., Cady, C.M., Gray, G.T., and Dunand, D.C.: Plasticity and damage in aluminum syntactic foams deformed under dynamic and quasi-static conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 391, 408 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santa Maria, J.A., Schultz, B.F., Ferguson, J., Gupta, N., and Rohatgi, P.K.: Effect of hollow sphere size and size distribution on the quasi-static and high strain rate compressive properties of Al-A380–Al2O3 syntactic foams. J. Mater. Sci 49, 1267 (2014).Google Scholar
Li, Q., Magkiriadis, I., and Harrigan, J.J.: Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. J. Cell. Plast 42, 371 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, X.-q., Wang, Z.-h., Zhao, L.-m., and Yang, G.-t.: Effects of cell size on compressive properties of aluminum foam. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc 16, 351 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, C. and Nutt, S.: Strain rate sensitivity and defects in steel foam. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 323, 358 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabiei, A., and Garcia-Avila, M.: Effect of various parameters on properties of composite steel foams under variety of loading rates. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 564, 539 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvandi-Tabrizi, Y., Whisler, D.A., Kim, H., and Rabiei, A.: High strain rate behavior of composite metal foams. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 631, 248 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B., Lin, Y., Li, S., Zhai, D., and Wu, G.: Quasi-static and high strain rates compressive behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foams. Compos. B. Eng 98, 288 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Petrinic, N., Siviour, C., Froud, R., and Reed, J.: Strain rate dependent compressive properties of glass microballoon epoxy syntactic foams. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 515, 19 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vural, M. and Ravichandran, G.: Dynamic response and energy dissipation characteristics of balsa wood: experiment and analysis. Int. J. Solids. Struct 40, 2147 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callister, W.D. and Rethwisch, D.G.: Materials Science and Engineering, 7th ed. (John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 2011), pp. 344.Google Scholar
Lankford, J.: Compressive strength and microplasticity in polycrystalline alumina. Mater. Sci 12, 791 (1977).Google Scholar
Wang, Z. and Li, P.: Dynamic failure and fracture mechanism in alumina ceramics: Experimental observations and finite element modelling. Ceram. Int. 41, 12763 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, P.J., Harrigan, J.J., and Reid, S.R.: Inertia effects in uniaxial dynamic compression of a closed cell aluminium alloy foam. Mater. Sci 18, 480 (2002).Google Scholar
Subhash, G., Liu, Q., and Gao, X.-L.: Quasistatic and high strain rate uniaxial compressive response of polymeric structural foams. Int. J. Impact Eng 32, 1113 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, V.S. and Fleck, N.A.: High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams. Int. J. Impact Eng 24, 277 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrigan, J.J., Reid, S.R., and Peng, C.: Inertia effects in impact energy absorbing materials and structures. Int. J. Impact Eng 22, 955 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, S.R. and Peng, C.: Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood. Int. J. Impact Eng 19, 531 (1997).Google Scholar
Calladine, C.R. and English, R.W.: Strain-rate and inertia effects in the collapse of two types of energy-absorbing structure. Int. J. Impact Eng 26, 689 (1984).Google Scholar
Zhang, T.G. and Yu, T.X.: A note on a ‘velocity sensitive’ energy-absorbing structure. Int. J. Impact Eng 8, 45 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Banda et al. supplementary material

Banda et al. supplementary material

Download Banda et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.5 MB