Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:39:19.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fatigue of in situ Reinforced Ti–8.5Al–1B–1Si

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2012

S. Rangarajan ,
P. B. Aswath  and
W. O. Soboyejo
S. Rangarajan
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Program and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019
P. B. Aswath
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Program and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019
W. O. Soboyejo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Get access

Abstract

The effect of temperature on the fatigue and fracture properties of an in situ reinforced super α alloy Ti–8.5Al–1B–1Si (wt. %) was investigated. At room temperature the as-extruded composite has a strength of 631 MPa with limited ductility. On increasing the temperature to 700 °C only a marginal drop in strength to 610 Mpa was observed along with a significant improvement in ductility to 5.9%. Low-cycle fatigue results indicate a marginal decrease in fatigue life as temperature is increased from room temperature to 700 °C. Fatigue crack growth studies in the as-extruded microstructure indicate a strong influence of R-ratio on both the threshold for fatigue crack growth and crack growth rates in the Paris regimes. At elevated temperatures, the resistance to fatigue crack growth increases with temperature below approximately 500 °C. At 600 °C, however, there is an increase in the near threshold crack growth rate due to embrittlement effects. At higher δK values , the resistance to fatigue crack growth at elevated temperatures is always better than that at room temperature. This improvement is attributed to the increase in the inherent resistance

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , April 1997 , pp. 1102 - 1111
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lütjering, G. and Weissmann, S., Acta Metall. 10, 785 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mendiratta, M. G., Sastry, S. M. L., and Smith, J. V., J. Mater. Sci. 11, 1835 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sastry, S. M. L., Lederich, R. J., Rao, P. S., and O'Neal, J. E., “Influence of Rare-Earth Additions on Properties of Titanium Alloys: Effect of Yttrium and Erbium Additives on Ti–8Al and Ti–10Al Alloys,” Office of Naval Research Technical Report, Report MDC Q0718, Contract No. N0014-76-C-0026, 1980.Google Scholar
4.Eylon, D., Fujishiro, P., Postants, P., and Froes, F., J. Metals. 36 (11), 55 (1984).Google Scholar
5.Whang, S., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 2224 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sastry, S. M. L., Meschter, P., and O'Neal, J., Metall. Trans. A. 15, 1451 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Soboyejo, W. O., Lederich, R. J., and Sastry, S. M. L., Acta Metall. 42 (8), 2579–2591 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Sastry, S. M. L., Peng, T., Meschter, P., and O'Neal, J. E., J. Metals 35 (9), 1451 (1983).Google Scholar
9.Konitzer, D., Muddle, B., Fraser, H., and Kirchheim, R., Titanium Science and Technology (Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Titanium, Oberusel, W. Germany, edited by Zwicker, U., Lütgering, G., and Bunk, W., Metallkunde, D. G. für, 1985), Vol. 1, p. 405.Google Scholar
10.Lu, Y. and Giessen, B., in Rapidly Solidified Alloys and Their Mechanical and Magnetic Properties, edited by Giessen, B. C., Polk, D. E., and Taulb, A. I. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 58, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986), p. 377.Google Scholar
11.Sutlif, J. and Rowe, R. G., in Rapidly Solidified Alloys and Their Mechanical and Magnetic Properties, edited by Giesse, B. C., Polk, D. E., and Taulb, A. I. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 58, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986), p. 371.Google Scholar
12.Traux, D. J. and McMahon, C. J., Metall. Trans. A, 7A, 139–144 (1976).Google Scholar
13.Blackburn, M. J. and Williams, J. C., Trans. Am. Soc. Met. 62, 398–409 (1969).Google Scholar
14.Paton, N. E., Williams, J. C., and Rauscher, G. P., Titanium Sci. Technol. 2, 1049–1069 (1973).Google Scholar
15.Conrad, H., Prog. Mater. Sci. 26, 123–403 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Williams, J. C., Sommer, A. W., and Tung, P. P.. Metall. Trans. 3A, 2979–2984 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Peng, T. C., Bowden, D. M., and Sastry, S. M. L., Advances in Powder Metallurgy IV, edited by Gassbarre, T. G. and Jandeska, W. F. (MPIF, Princeton, NJ, 1989), p. 387.Google Scholar
18.Aswath, P. B. and Suresh, S., Mater. Sci. Engg. A114, L5–L10 (1989).Google Scholar
19.Suresh, S., Eng. Fract. Mech. 21, 453–463 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Murray, J., Binary Phase Diagrams, edited by Massalski, T. (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Metals Park, OH, 1987), p. 1835.Google Scholar
21.Gray, G. T., Lütjering, G., and Williams, J. C., Metall. Trans. 21A, 95–105 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Rangarajan, S., Aswath, P. B., and Soboyejo, W. O., Scripta Metall. Mater. 35 (2), 239–245 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Kerans, R. J., Metall. Trans. 15A, 1721–1729 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Sastry, S. M. L. and Lipsitt, H. A., Acta Metall. 25, 1279–1232 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Velasco, B. and Aswath, P. B., Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Aging Materials, edited by Liaw, P. K., Vishwanathan, R., Murthy, K. L., Simonen, E. P., and Frear, D. (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 1993), pp. 467–473.Google Scholar
26.Williams, J. C. and Lütjering, G., Titanium 80-Science and Technology, edited by Kimura, H. and Izumi, O. (AIME, New York, 1980), pp. 672–681.Google Scholar