Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:39:16.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of hardness and transmittance in irradiated LiF single crystals at elevated temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Hung-Ye Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Yu-Zen Tsai
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Sanboh Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

The evolution of hardness and transmittance of irradiated LiF single crystals at elevated temperatures has been investigated. The Vickers hardness is proportional to φ1/3 where φ is the dosage of γ-rays. The thermal annealing of hardness which is analyzed according to a first-order kinetic process has one stage for φ = 100 KGy and two stages for φ ≥ 250 KGy. For a given dosage, the activation energy of stage I is larger than that of stage II. The transmittance of irradiated LiF crystals is attributed to F, M, R1, and R2 centers. The transmittance decreases with increasing time at the brief durations, then oscillates, and finally increases monotonically. The region in which the transmittance increases monotonically with time is simulated by a second-order kinetic process of the color center. The activation energy of optical absorption was determined. Comparing both activation energies of hardness and optical absorption, we find that the mechanism of the kinetic process for hardness differs from that for optical absorption.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Nadeau, J. S. and Johnston, W. G., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 2563 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Nadeau, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 34, 2248 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Nadeau, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3480 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Nadeau, J. S., J. Appl. Phys. 35, 1248 (1964).Google Scholar
5Whapham, A.D. and Makin, M.J., Philos. Mag. 5, 237 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Sibley, W.A. and Sonder, E., J. Appl. Phys. 34, 2366 (1963).Google Scholar
7Lerma, I. S. and Agullo-Lopez, F., J. Appl. Phys. 41, 4628 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Roberts, S. G. and Page, T. F., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 4385 (1986).Google Scholar
9Catlow, C. R. A., Diller, K. M., and Hobbs, L. W., Philos. Mag. 42, 123 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Westervelt, D. R., Acta Metall. 1, 755 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Ermakov, G. A. and Nadgornyi, E.M., Soviet Phys.-Solid State 13, 550 (1971).Google Scholar
12Lerma, I. S. and Agullo-Lopez, F., Philos. Mag. 27, 993 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Basiev, T. T., Voronko, Y. K., Mirov, S. B., Osiko, V. V., and Prokhorov, A. M., Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 12, 530 (1982).Google Scholar
14Chen, J., Appl. Opt. 24, 1073 (1985).Google Scholar
15Chen, J., Fu, Y. K., and Lee, S., Appl. Opt. 29, 2669 (1990).Google Scholar
16Gilman, J.J. and Johnston, W.G., J. Appl. Phys. 29, 877 (1958).Google Scholar