Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:22:45.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of conducting oxide barrier layers on the stability of Crofer® 22 APU/Ca3Co4O9 interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2014

Tim C. Holgate Open the ORCID record for Tim C. Holgate [Opens in a new window] ,
Li Han ,
NingYu Wu ,
Ngo Van Nong  and
Nini Pryds
Tim C. Holgate*
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark—Risø Campus, DK4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Li Han
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark—Risø Campus, DK4000 Roskilde, Denmark
NingYu Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark—Risø Campus, DK4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Ngo Van Nong
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark—Risø Campus, DK4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Nini Pryds
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark—Risø Campus, DK4000 Roskilde, Denmark
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Practical implementation of oxide thermoelectrics on an industrial or commercial scale for waste heat energy conversion requires the development of chemically stable interfaces between metal interconnects and oxide thermoelements that exhibit low electrical contact resistances. A commercially available high-chrome iron alloy (i.e., Crofer® 22 APU) serving as the interconnect metal was spray coated with LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3 (LNFO) or (Mn,Co)3O4 spinel and then interfaced with a p-type thermoelectric material—calcium cobaltate (Ca3Co4O9)—using spark plasma sintering. The interfaces have been characterized in terms of their thermal and electronic transport properties and chemical stability. With long-term exposure of the interfaced samples to 800 °C in air, the cobalt–manganese spinel acted as a diffusion barrier between the Ca3Co4O9 and the Crofer® 22 APU alloy resulting in improved interfacial stability compared to that of samples containing LNFO as a barrier layer, and especially those without any barrier. The initial area specific interfacial resistance of the Ca3Co4O9/(Mn,Co)3O4/Crofer® 22 APU interface at 800 °C was found to be ∼1 mΩ·cm2.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 23 , 14 December 2014 , pp. 2891 - 2897
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

He, J., Liu, Y., and Funahashi, R.: Oxide thermoelectrics: The challenges, progress, and outlook. J. Mater. Res. 26(15), 1762–1772 (2011).Google Scholar
Funahashi, R. and Urata, S.: Fabrication and application of an oxide thermoelectric system. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 4(4), 297–307 (2007).Google Scholar
Noudem, J.G., Lemonnier, S., Prevel, M., Reddy, E.S., Guilmeau, E., and Goupil, C.: Thermoelectric ceramics for generators. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28(1), 41–48 (2008).Google Scholar
Han, L., Jiang, Y., Li, S., Su, H., Lan, X., Qin, K., Han, T., Zhong, H., Chen, L., and Yu, D.: High temperature thermoelectric properties and energy transfer devices of Ca3Co4−xAgxO9 and Ca1−ySmyMnO3 . J. Alloys Compd. 509(36), 8970–8977 (2011).Google Scholar
Holgate, T.C., Han, L., Wu, N., Bøjesen, E.D., Christensen, M., Iversen, B.B., Nong, N.V., and Pryds, N.: Characterization of the interface between an Fe–Cr alloy and the p-type thermoelectric oxide Ca3Co4O9 . J. Alloys Compd. 582, 827–833 (2014).Google Scholar
Komatsu, T., Arai, H., Chiba, R., Nozawa, K., Arakawa, M., and Sato, K.: Cr poisoning suppression in solid oxide fuel cells using LaNi (Fe) O3 electrodes. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 9(1), A9–A12 (2006).Google Scholar
Yang, Z., Xia, G-G., Li, X-H., and Stevenson, J.W.: (Mn,Co)3O4 spinel coatings on ferritic stainless steels for SOFC interconnect applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 32(16), 3648–3654 (2007).Google Scholar
Pattarkine, G.V., Dasgupta, N., and Virkar, A.V.: Oxygen transport resistant and electrically conductive perovskite coatings for solid oxide fuel cell interconnects. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155(10), B1036–B1046 (2008).Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Hua, B., Duan, N., Pu, J., Chi, B., and Li, J.: Cu-Fe spinel coating as oxidation barrier for Fe-16Cr metallic interconnect in solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159(9), C388–C392 (2012).Google Scholar
Waluyo, N.S., Park, B-K., Lee, S-B., Lim, T-H., Park, S-J., Song, R-H., and Lee, J-W.: (Mn,Cu)3O4-based conductive coatings as effective barriers to high-temperature oxidation of metallic interconnects for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Solid State Electrochem. 18(2), 445–452 (2014).Google Scholar
Basu, R.N., Tietz, F., Teller, O., Wessel, E., Buchkremer, H.P., and Stöver, D.: LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3 as a cathode contact material for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Solid State Electrochem. 7(7), 416–420 (2003).Google Scholar
Wu, J. and Liu, X.: Recent development of SOFC metallic interconnect. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 26(4), 293–305 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holgate, T.C., Wu, N., Søndergaard, M., Iversen, B.B., Nong, N.V., and Pryds, N.: Kinetics, stability, and thermal contact resistance of nickel–Ca3Co4O9 interfaces formed by spark plasma sintering. J. Electron. Mater. 42(7), 1661–1668 (2013).Google Scholar
Wu, N., Holgate, T.C., Nong, N.V., Pryds, N., and Linderoth, S.: Effects of synthesis and spark plasma sintering conditions on the thermoelectric properties of Ca3Co4O9+δ . J. Electron. Mater. 42(7), 2134–2142 (2013).Google Scholar
Wang, K., Liu, Y., and Fergus, J.W.: Interactions between SOFC interconnect coating materials and chromia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94(12), 4490–4495 (2011).Google Scholar