Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:42:24.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of magnetite particle size on adsorption and desorption of arsenite and arsenate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2005

S. Yean ,
L. Cong ,
C.T. Yavuz ,
J.T. Mayo ,
W.W. Yu ,
A.T. Kan ,
V.L. Colvin  and
M.B. Tomson
S. Yean
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
L. Cong
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
C.T. Yavuz
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
J.T. Mayo
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
W.W. Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
A.T. Kan*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
V.L. Colvin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
M.B. Tomson
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined arsenic adsorption on varying adsorbents including iron oxides, aluminum hydroxides, alumina, and carbon as a means of arsenic removal in drinking water treatments. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of magnetite particle size on the adsorption and desorption behavior of arsenite and arsenate, and to investigate the competitive adsorption between natural organic matter (NOM) and arsenic. Increases in adsorption maximum capacities for arsenite and arsenate were observed with decreasing magnetite particle size. Arsenic desorption is hysteretic, more so with the smaller nanoparticles. Such desorption hysteresis might result from a higher arsenic affinity for magnetite nanoparticles. In the presence of NOM, substantial decrease in arsenic sorption to magnetite nanoparticles was observed. It would be beneficial to thoroughly investigate adsorption and desorption of arsenic on magnetite nanoparticles for further practical purposes.

Keywords

AdsorptionMagneticNanoparticle
Type
Articles—Energy and The Environment Special Section
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 20 , Issue 12 , December 2005 , pp. 3255 - 3264
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bissen, M. and Frimmel, F.H.: Arsenic—A review. Part I: Occurrence, toxicity, speciation, mobility. Acta Hydroch. Hydrob. 31, 9 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Anderson, L.C.D. and Bruland, K.W.: Biogeochemistry of arsenic in natural waters: The importance of methylated species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, 420 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Tseng, W.P., Chu, H.M., How, S.W., Fong, J.M., Lin, C.S. and Yeh, S.: Prevalence of skin cancer in an endemic area of chronic arsenicism in Taiwan. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 40, 453 (1968).Google Scholar
4.Clarifications to compliance and new source contaminants monitoring. Assessed on April, 2005. http//www.epa.gov/safewater/ars/arsenic_finalrule.pdf.Google Scholar
5.Twidwell, L.G., McCloskey, J., Miranda, P., and Gale, M.: Technologies and potential technologies for removing arsenic from process and mine wastewater, in Proceedings, Global Symposium on Recycling, Waste Treatment and Clean Technology, edited by Gaballah, I., Hager, J. and Solozabal, R., Editors. (TMS, Warrendale, PA. 1999), pp. 1715–1726.Google Scholar
6.Bissen, M. and Frimmel, F.H.: Arsenic—A review. Part II: Oxidation of arsenic and its removal in water treatment. Acta Hydroch. Hydrob. 31, 97 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pierce, M.L. and Moore, C.B.: Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron hydroxide. Water Res. 15, 1247 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Raven, K.P., Jain, A. and Loeppert, R.H.: Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: Kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 344 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Onoda, G.Y.J. and DeBruyn, P.L.: Proton adsorption at the ferric oxide/aqueous solution interface. Surf. Sci. 4, 48 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Jain, A. and Loeppert, R.H.: Effect of competing anions on the adsorption of arsenate and arsenite by ferrihydrite. J. Environ. Qual. 29, 1422 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Dixit, S. and Hering, J.G.: Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: Implications for arsenic mobility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 4182 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Fendorf, S., Eick, M.J. and Grossl, P.: Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite. 1. Surface structure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 315 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Manceau, A.: The mechanism of anion adsorption on ironoxides—Evidence for the bonding of arsenate tetrahedra on free Fe(O,OH)(6) edges. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 3647 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Sun, X.H. and Doner, H.E.: An investigation of arsenate and arsenite bonding structure on goethite by FTIR. Soil Sci. 161, 865 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Waychunas, G.A., Rea, B.A., Fuller, C.C. and Davis, J.A.: Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite, Part l. EXAFS studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenate. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 2251 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Manning, B.A., Hunt, M.L., Amrhein, C. and Yarmoff, J.A.: Arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) reactions with zerovalent iron corrosion products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 5455 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Hinkle, S.R. and Polette, D.J.: Arsenic in Ground Water of the Willamette Basin, Oregon (U.S. Geological Survey, Portland, OR, 1999).Google Scholar
18.Gao, Y., Wahi, R., Kan, A.T., Falkner, J.C., Colvin, V.L. and Tomson, M.B.: Adsorption of cadmium on anatase nanoparticles-effect of crystal size and pH. Langmuir 20, 9585 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Yin, Y., Allen, H.E., Huang, C.P. and Sanders, P.F.: Adsorption/desorption isotherms of Hg(II) by soil. Soil Sci. 162, 35 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Ainsworth, C.C., Pilou, J.L., Gassman, P.L. and Van Der Sluys, W.G.: Cobalt, cadmium, and lead sorption on hydrous iron oxide: Residence time effect. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 1615 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.DeMarco, M.J., SenGupta, A.K. and Greenleaf, J.E.: Arsenic removal using a polymeric/inorganic hybrid sorbent. Water Res. 37, 164 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Genç-Fuhrman, H., Tjell, J.C. and McConchie, D.: Adsorption of arsenic from water using activated neutralized red mud. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 2428 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Appelo, C.A.J., Van der Weiden, M.J.J., Tournassat, C. and Charlet, L.: Surface complexation of ferrous iron and carbonate on ferrihydrite and the mobilization of arsenic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 3096 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Jackson, B.P. and Miller, W.P.: Effectiveness of phosphate and hydroxide for desorption of arsenic and selenium species from iron oxides. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 1616 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Violante, A. and Pigna, M.: Competitve sorption of arsenate and phosphate on different clay minerals and soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66, 1788 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Manning, B.A. and Goldberg, S.: Modeling arsenate competitive adsorption on kaolinite, montmorillonite and illite. Clays Clay Miner. 44, 609 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Swedlund, P.J. and Webster, J.G.: Adsorption and polymerisation of silicic acid on ferrihydrite, and its effect on arsenic adsorption. Water Res. 33, 3413 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Smith, E., Naidu, R. and Alston, A.M.: Chemistry of inorganic arsenic in soils: II. Effect of phosphorous, sodium, and calcium on arsenic sorption. J. Environ. Qual. 31, 557 (2002).Google ScholarPubMed
29.Su, C.M. and Puls, R.W.: Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: Effects of phosphate, silicate, carbonate, borate, sulfate, chromate, molybdate, and nitrate relative to chloride. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 4562 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Redman, A.D., Macalady, D.L. and Ahmann, D.: Natural organic matter affects arsenic speciation and sorption onto hematite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 2889 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Fuller, C.C., Davis, J.A. and Waychunas, G.A.: Surface-chemistry of ferrihydrite 2. Kinetics of arsenate adsorption and corprecipitation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 2271 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Fukushi, K. and Sato, T.: Using a surface complexation model to predict the nature and stability of nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 1250 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Martra, G.: Lewis acid and base sites at the surface of microcrystalline TiO2 anatase: Relationships between surface morphology and chemical behaviour. Appl. Catal. Gen. 200, 275 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Luttge, A., Bolton, E.W. and Lasaga, A.C.: An interferometric study of the dissolution kinetics of anorthite: The role of reactive surface area: in Biogeochemical cycles and their evolution over geologic time. Am. J. Sci. 299, 652 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Bilkova, Z., Slovakova, M., Lycka, A., Horak, D., Lenfeld, J., Turkova, J. and Churacek, J.: Oriented immobilization of galactose oxidase to bead and magnetic bead cellulose and poly(HEMA-co-EDMA) and magnetic poly(HEMA-co-EDMA) microspheres. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 770(1–2), 25 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Bilkova, Z., Slovakova, M., Horak, D., Lenfeld, J. and Churacek, J.: Enzymes immobilized on magnetic carriers: Efficient and selective system for protein modification. J. Chromatography B 770, 177 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Sun, W., Khosravi, F., Albrechtsen, H., Brovko, L.Y. and Griffiths, M.W.: Comparison of ATP and in vivo bioluminescence for assessing the efficiency of immunomagnetic sorbents for live Escherichia coli O157: H7 cells. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92, 1021 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Bucak, S., Jones, D.A., Laibinis, P.E. and Hatton, T.A.: Protein separations using colloidal magnetic nanoparticles. Biotechnol. Prog. 19, 477 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Moeser, G.D., Roach, K.A., Green, W.H., Laibinis, P.E. and Hatton, T.A.: Water-based magnetic fluids as extractants for synthetic organic compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 4739 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Yu, W.W., Falkner, J.C., Shih, B.S. and Colvin, V.L.: Preparation and characterization of monodisperse PbSe semiconductor nanocrystals in a noncoordinating solvent. Chem. Mater. 16, 3318 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Bates, R.G.: Determination of pH: Theory and Practice (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
42.Stumm, W. and Morgan, J.J.: Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
43.Tewari, P.H. and McClean, A.W.: Temperature dependence of point of zero charge of alumina and magnetite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 267 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Marmier, N., Delisee, A. and Fromage, F.: Surface complexation modeling of Yb(III), Ni(II), and Cs(I) sorption on magnetite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 211, 54 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Cheng, Z., Geen, A.V., Jing, C., Meng, X., Seddique, A. and Ahmed, K.M.: Performance of a household-level arsenic removal system during 4-month deployments in Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 3442 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Meng, X.G. and Letterman, R.D.: Effect of component oxide interactions on the adsorption properties of mixed oxides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 970 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47.Morel, F.M.M. and Hering, J.G.: Principles and Applications of Aquatic Chemistry (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993).Google Scholar
48.Gao, Y., Kan, A.T. and Tomson, M.B.: Critical evaluation of desorption phenomena of heavy metals from natural sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 5566 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Stumm, W. and Morgan, J.J.: Aquatic Chemistry Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Water, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1996).Google Scholar
50.Kan, A.T., Fu, G., Hunter, M., Chen, W., Ward, C.H. and Tomson, M.B.: Irreversible sorption of neutral hydrocarbons to sediments: Experimental observations and model predictions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 892 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51.Munoz, J.A., Gonzalo, A. and Valiente, M.: Arsenic adsorption by Fe(III)-loaded open-celled cellulose sponge. Thermodynamic and selectivity aspects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 3405 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52.Yu, W.W., Falkner, J.C., Yavuz, C.T. and Colvin, V.L.: Synthesis of monodisperse iron oxide nanocrystals by thermal decomposition of iron carboxylate salts. Chem. Comm. 20, 2306 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar