Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:11:22.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of machining residual stresses on the repetitive impact behavior of silicon nitride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Sreeram Srinivasan ,
Peter J. Blau  and
Julia L. Bjerke
Sreeram Srinivasan*
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6063
Peter J. Blau
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6063
Julia L. Bjerke
Affiliation:
Caterpillar Technical Center, Mossville, Illinois 61552
*
a)Present address: Sundram Fasteners Ltd., 1-10-63/1/1 Veer Chambers, II Floor, Begumpet, Hyderabad 500 016, India.
Get access

Abstract

Silicon nitride is a candidate valve material for internal combustion engines. Its low density and attractive mechanical properties relative to conventional metallic alloys portend significant improvements in valve performance. The production of valves involves a significant amount of machining, especially grinding. Grinding of ceramic materials may result in surface and subsurface damage in the form of fracture or residual stresses which may affect impact behavior and, consequently, the behavior of silicon nitride ceramic materials as valves. The effects of residual stresses due to grinding on the impact wear behavior of one silicon nitride composition ground under various conditions have been investigated.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 95 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Ziegler, G., Heinrich, J., and Wotting, G., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 3041 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Heinrich, J. and Hamminger, R., in Silicon Nitride Ceramics: Scientific and Technological Advances, edited by Chen, I-W., Becher, P. F., Mitomo, M., Petzow, G., and Yen, T-S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 287, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), p. 513.Google Scholar
3Subramanian, K. and Kopp, R. N., in Ceramics and Glasses, Engineered Materials Handbook (ASM INTERNATIONAL, Materials Park, OH, 1991), Vol. 4, p. 336.Google Scholar
4Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (2), 187 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Becher, P. F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (2), 255 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Johnson-Walls, D., Evans, A. G., Marshall, D. B., and James, M. R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69 (1), 44 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Wobker, H. G. and Tonshoff, H. K., in Machining of Advanced Materials, edited by Jahanmir, S. (NIST Special Publication 847, 1993), p. 171.Google Scholar
8Samuel, R., Chandrasekar, S., Farris, T. N., and Licht, R. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (10), 1960 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Matsuo, Y., Ogasawara, T., Kimura, S., Sato, S., and Yasuda, E., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. (International Edition) 99, 371 (1991).Google Scholar
10Srinivasan, S. R. and Blau, P. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (3), 683 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Blau, P. J. and Hanft, T. A., Trib. Int. 27 (2), 109 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Vander Voort, G. F., Metallography Principles and Practice (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984), p. 426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Underwood, E. E., Quantitative Stereology (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1970).Google Scholar
14Lawn, B. R., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 299 (2), 307 (1967).Google Scholar
15Chiang, S-S. and Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66 (1), 4 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar