Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:06:50.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of a high magnetic field on the morphological and crystallographic features of primary Al6Mn phase formed during solidification process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2013

Lei Li*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110004, People’s Republic of China
Zhihao Zhao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110004, People’s Republic of China
Yubo Zuo
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110004, People’s Republic of China
Qingfeng Zhu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110004, People’s Republic of China
Jianzhong Cui
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110004, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Morphological and crystallographic effects of a high magnetic field on the primary Al6Mn phase formed during the solidification of hypereutectic Al–3.25wt%Mn were investigated. Without the field, the primary Al6Mn crystals are mainly concentrated in the lower part and reveal a dispersed needle-like shape. In three dimension, the needles are in the form of a quadrangular prism (laterally bound by {110} and preferentially growing along <001>). When the magnetic field is applied, they tend to be distributed homogenously and show some extra agglomerate- or chain-like forms (preferentially extending along <100>). Furthermore, they also tend to preferentially orient with <100> parallel to the field direction. The homogenous distribution is caused by the magnetic viscosity resistance force. The “agglomerates” or “chains” are the result of a “bifurcation effect” due to the breakdown at the sharp edges of the quadrangular prisms. The preferential orientation should be attributed to the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of Al6Mn.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Martienssen, W. and Warlimont, H.: Springer Handbook of Condensed Matter and Materials Data (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, New York, 2005), p. 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondolfo, L.F.: Aluminum Alloys: Structure and Properties (Butterworth, London, 1976), p. 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahadur, A.: Intermetallic phases in Al-Mn alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 23, 48 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masahashi, N., Matsuo, M., and Watanabe, K.: Development of preferred orientation in annealing of Fe-3.25%Si in a high magnetic field. J. Mater. Res. 13, 457 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshikawa, N., Endo, T., Taniguchi, S., Awaji, S., Watanabe, K., and Aoyagi, E.: Microstructure and orientation of iron crystals by thermal chemical vapor deposition with imposition of magnetic field. J. Mater. Res. 17, 2865 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, W.P., Zhang, H., Sun, J., Zuo, L., He, J.C., and Lu, J.: Control of iron nitride formation by a high magnetic field. J. Mater. Res. 25, 2082 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C.Q., Zhao, J., and Xu, Y.: Kinetics of intermetallic compound layers and Cu dissolution at Sn1.5Cu/Cu interface under high magnetic field. J. Mater. Res. 25, 359 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vives, C.: Solidification of tin in the presence of electric and magnetic field. J. Cryst. Growth 76, 170 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vives, C.: Effects of a magnetically forced convection during the crystallization in mould of aluminium alloys. J. Cryst. Growth 94, 739 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T., Wang, Q., Zhang, C., Gao, A., Li, D.G., and He, J.C.: Formation of chainlike structures in an Mn-89.7wt%Sb alloy during isothermal annealing process in the semisolid state in a high magnetic field. J. Mater. Res. 24, 2321 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., Gao, A., Liu, T., Liu, F., Zhang, C., and He, J.C.: Solidified microstructure evolution of Mn-Sb near-eutectic alloy under high magnetic field conditions. J. Mater. Res. 24, 2331 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T., Wang, Q., Gao, A., Zhang, H.W., Wang, K., and He, J.C.: Distribution of alloying elements and the corresponding structural evolution of Mn-Sb alloys in high magnetic field gradients. J. Mater. Res. 25, 1718 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Zhang, Y.D., Esling, C., Jiang, H.X., Zhao, Z.H., Zuo, Y.B., and Cui, J.Z.: Influence of a high magnetic field on the precipitation behaviors of the primary Al3Fe phase during the solidification of hypereutectic Al-3.31wt% Fe alloy. J. Cryst. Growth 339, 61 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., Gagnoud, A., Ren, Z.M., Fautrelle, Y., and Moreaub, R.: Investigation of thermoelectric magnetic convection and its effect on solidification structure during directional solidification under a low axial magnetic field. Acta Mater. 57, 2180 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., Zhang, Y.D., Fautrelle, Y., Ren, Z.M., and Esling, C.: Experimental evidence for liquid/solid interface instability caused by the stress in the solid during directional solidification under a strong magnetic field. Scr. Mater. 60, 489 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., Ren, Z.M., Fautrelle, Y., Gagnoud, A., Zhang, Y.D., and Esling, C.: Degeneration of columnar dendrites during directional solidification under a high magnetic field. Scr. Mater. 60, 443 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, F.W., Ren, Z.M., Ren, W.L., Deng, K., Zhong, Y.B., and Yu, J.B.: Effects of a high-gradient magnetic field on the migratory behavior of primary crystal silicon in hypereutectic Al-Si alloy. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 9, 1 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, C.J., Wang, Q., Wang, Z.Y., Li, H.T., Nakajima, K., and He, J.C.: Phase alignment and crystal orientation of Al3Ni in Al-Ni alloy by imposition of a uniform high magnetic field. J. Cryst. Growth 310, 1256 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, H.J., Li, X.Z., Su, Y.Q., Liu, D.M., Guo, J.J., and Fu, H.Z.: 3-D morphology and growth mechanism of primary Al6Mn intermetallic compound in directionally solidified Al-3at.%Mn alloy. Intermetallics 23, 32 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, D.W., Guo, J., Yan, Z.M., and Li, T.J.: Effect of high magnetic fields on the solidification microstructure of an Al-Mn alloy. Rare Met. 28, 302 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y.D., Esling, C., Zhao, X., and Zuo, L.: Indirect two-trace method to determine a faceted low-energy interface between two crystallographically correlated crystals. J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 436 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assael, M.J., Kakosimos, K., Banish, R.M., Brillo, J., Egry, I., Brooks, R., Quested, P.N., Mills, K.C., Nagashima, A., Sato, Y., and Wakeham, W.A.: Reference data for the density and viscosity of liquid aluminum and liquid iron. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 35, 285 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prywer, J.: Correlation between growth of high-index faces, relative growth rates and crystallographic structure of crystal. Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 61 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prywer, J.: Correlation between crystal structure, relative growth rates and evolution of crystal surfaces. Acta Phys. Pol. A 103, 85 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inatomi, Y.: Buoyancy convection in cylindrical conducting melt with low Grashof number under uniform static magnetic field. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 4821 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassemi, M., Barsi, S., Alexander, J.I.D., and Banish, M.: Contamination of microgravity liquid diffusivity measurements by void-generated thermocapillary convection. J. Cryst. Growth 276, 621 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiesen, D.H., Wargo, M.J., Motakef, S., Carlson, D.J., Nakos, J.S., and Witt, A.F.: Dopant segregation during vertical Bridgman-Stockbarger growth with melt stabilization by strong axial magnetic fields. J. Crystal Growth 85, 557 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, W.F.: Crystal growth from solutions. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 164, 79 (1938).Google Scholar
Van Dam, J.C. and Mischgofsky, F.H.: The application of a new, simple interference technique to the determination of growth concentration gradients of the layer perovskite NH3(CH2)3NH3CdCl4. J. Cryst. Growth 84, 539 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Peng, R.W., Bennema, P., and Ming, N.B.: Morphological instability of crystals grown from thin aqueous solution films with a free surface. Philos. Mag. A 71, 409 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, R.F., Alexander, J.I.D., and Rosenberger, F.: Growth morphology with anisotropic surface kinetics. J. Cryst. Growth 100, 313 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemings, M.C.: Solidification Processing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974), p. 322.Google Scholar
Asai, S., Sassa, K., and Tahashi, M.: Crystal orientation of non-magnetic materials by imposition of a high magnetic field. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 4, 455 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, T., Tahashi, M., Sassa, K., and Asai, S.: The control of crystal orientation in non-magnetic metals by imposition of a high magnetic field. ISIJ. Int. 43, 855 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar