Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-03T12:45:32.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Durability of cement-based materials in simulated radioactive liquid waste: Effect of phosphate, sulphate, and chloride ions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

A. Guerrero ,
S. Hérnandez  and
S. Goñi
A. Guerrero
Affiliation:
Institute of Construction Science Eduardo Torroja (CSIC), C/Serrano Galvache, s/n 28033 Madrid, Spain
S. Hérnandez
Affiliation:
Institute of Construction Science Eduardo Torroja (CSIC), C/Serrano Galvache, s/n 28033 Madrid, Spain
S. Goñi
Affiliation:
Institute of Construction Science Eduardo Torroja (CSIC), C/Serrano Galvache, s/n 28033 Madrid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The durability of a specific backfilling pozzolanic cement mortar, which is employed in Spain, in concrete containers for the storage of low (LLW) and medium level wastes (MLW), has been studied by means of the Köch–Steinegger test at the temperature of 40 °C during a period of 365 days. Mortar samples were immersed in a simulated radioactive liquid waste very rich in sulphate (0.68 M), phosphate (0.89 M), and chloride (0.51 M) ions. The changes of the microstructure were followed by x-ray diffraction (XRD), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Pore solution was extracted at different periods in order to see the changes of the chemical composition caused by the diffusion of those ions inside the microstructure.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 13 , Issue 8 , August 1998 , pp. 2151 - 2160
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Rahman, A. A. and Glasser, F. P., Cements in Radioactive Waste Management, Characterization Requirements of Cement Products for Acceptance and Quality Assurance Purposes (Commission of the European Communities, Nuclear Science and Technology, EUR 10803 EN, 1987).Google Scholar
2.Roy, D. M., RILEM-Workshop on Leaching Conditions of Concrete and Cement-Bound Materials, Vienna, June 9–10 (1992).Google Scholar
3.Glasser, F. P., RILEM-Workshop on Leaching Conditions of Concrete and Cement-Bound Materials, Vienna, June 9–10 (1992).Google Scholar
4.Komarneni, S. and Roy, D. M., Cem. Concr. Res. 11, 789–794 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Macphee, D. E. and Glasser, F. P.,Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. XVIII, 66–71 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hills, C. D., Sollars, C. J. and Perry, R., Cem. Concr. Res. 23, 196–212 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Glasser, F. P., Cem. Concr. Res. 22, 201–216 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lee, J. H. and Roy, D. M., ACERS 96th Annual Meeting, Indianapolis, IN, April 24–28 (1994), Book of Abstract, p. 108.Google Scholar
9.Haworth, A., Sharland, S. M., and Tweed, C. J., in Scientific Basis of Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V. M. and Brown, P. W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), 175–181.Google Scholar
10.Glasser, F. P., Rahman, A. A., Crawford, R. W., McCulloch, C. E., and Angus, M. J., DOE, U.K., Report No. DOE/RW/84050 (1984).Google Scholar
11.Tamas, F. D. and Csetenyi, L. J., Cem. Concr. Res. 22, 393–397 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Serne, R. J., in Scientific Basis of Nuclear Waste Management XIII, edited by Oversby, V. M. and Brown, P. W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
13.Goñi, S., Hernández, M. S., Guerrero, A., and Lorenzo, M. P., Construction and Building Materials (UK) 10, 171–177 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hernández, M. S., Guerrero, A., Goñi, S., and Lorenzo, M. P., Cem. Concr. Res. (1997).Google Scholar
15.Goñi, S., Hernández, M. S., and Guerrero, A., Proceedings of the III International Conference of ANQUE, Solid and Liquid Wastes: Their Best Destination (II), Puerto de la Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Island) (December 1994), Vol. 2, pp. 455–464.Google Scholar
16.Guerrero, A. M., Goñi, S., Hernández, M. S., and Lorenzo, M. P., Proceedings of the III International Conference of ANQUE, Solid and Liquid Wastes: Their Best Destination (II), Puerto de la Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Island, December 1994), Vol. 2, pp. 465–474.Google Scholar
17.Hernández, S., Guerrero, A., and Goñi, S., Proceedings of Spectrum'96. Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management International Topical, Washington, DC (August 1996), Vol. 1, pp. 133–140.Google Scholar
18.Li, G., Bescop, P. Le, and Moranville, M., Cem. Concr. Res. 26, 27–33 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Mehta, P. Kumar, in Sulfate Attack on Concrete. A Critical Review, pp. 105–130 of Materials Science of Concrete III, edited by Skalny, J. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1992).Google Scholar
20.Brown, P. W. and Bothe, J. V., Jr., Adv. Cem. Concr. 5, 47–63 (1993).Google Scholar
21.Barneyback, R. S. and Diamond, S., Cem. Concr. Res. 11, 279–285 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Köch, A. und Steinegger, H.Zement-Kalk-Gips 7, 317–324 (1960).Google Scholar
23.Beevers, C. A., Acta Crystallogr. 11, 273–277 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Sakae, T., Nagata, H., and Sudo, T., Am. Mineralog. 63, 520–527 (1978).Google Scholar
25.Bohner, M. and Lemaitre, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 1427–1434 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar