Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:47:45.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffuse Phase Transition in Epitaxial BaTiO3 Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Soma Chattopadhyay ,
A. R. Teren ,
Jin-Ha Hwang ,
T. O. Mason  and
B. W. Wessels
Soma Chattopadhyay
Affiliation:
Materials Research Center and Materials Science & Engineering Department, Northwestern University, 2225 North Campus Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Get access

Abstract

The thickness dependence of the dielectric properties of epitaxial BaTiO3 thin films was investigated for thicknesses ranging from 15 to 320 nm. The films were deposited by low-pressure metalorganic chemical vapor deposition on (100) MgO substrates. The relative dielectric permittivity and the loss tangent values decreased with decreasing thickness. High-temperature dielectric measurements showed that with decreasing film thickness, the ferroelectric-to-paraelectric transition temperature decreased, the relative dielectric permittivity decreased, and the phase transition was diffuse. The c/a ratio also decreased with decreasing film thickness. The observed behavior for epitaxial films of BaTiO3 was attributed to the presence of strain in the films.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , March 2002 , pp. 669 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Udayakumar, K.R., Schuele, P.J., Chen, J., Krupanidhi, S.B., and Cross, L.E., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 3981 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakashita, Y., Segawa, H., Tominaga, K., and Okada, M., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 7857 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basceri, C., Streiffer, S.K., Kingon, A.I., and Waser, R., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 2497 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjormander, C., Sreenivas, K., Duan, M., Grishin, A.M., and Rao, K.V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2493 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanno, I., Hayashi, S., Kitagawa, M., Takayama, R., and Hirao, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 145 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kniepkamp, H. and Heywany, W., Z. Angew Phys. 6, 385 (1954).Google Scholar
Anan’eva, A.A., Strizkov, B.V., and Ugryumova, M.A., Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Physics Ser. (Eng. Trans.) 2A, 1395 (1960).Google Scholar
Hoerman, B.H., Ford, G.M., Kaufman, L.D., and Wessels, B.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2248 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoneda, Y., Kasatani, H., Terauchi, H., Yano, Y., Terashima, T., and Bando, Y., J. Cryst. Growth 150, 1090 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yano, Y., Iijima, K., Daitoh, Y., Terashima, T., Bando, Y., Watanabe, Y., Kasatani, H., and Terauchi, H., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 7833 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Lee, S., Park, Y., and Park, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 7307 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, S., Teren, A., and Wessels, B.W., in Ferroelectric Thin Films VII, edited by Jones, R.E., Schwartz, R.W., Summerfelt, S.R., and Yoo, I.K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 541, Warrendale, PA, 1999), p. 489.Google Scholar
Wills, L.A., Feil, W.A., Wessels, B.W., Tonge, L.M., and Marks, T.J., J. Cryst. Growth 107, 712 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachinger, W.A., J. Sci. Instrum. 25, 254 (1948)..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreiske, P., Thesis, M.S., Northwestern University (June 1986).Google Scholar
Hordon, M.J. and Averbach, B.L., Acta Metall. 9, 237 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnell, G.W., Cermak, I.A., Silvester, P., and Wong, S.K., IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. SU–17, 188 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchino, K., Sadanaga, E., and Hirose, T.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1555 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, S., Ayyub, P., Palkar, V.R., and Multani, M.S., Phys. Rev. B 52, 13177 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonscher, A.K., Dielectric Relaxation of Solids (Chelsea Dielectrics Press Limited, London, United Kingdom, 1983).Google Scholar
Smolenskii, G., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., Supplement 28, 26 (1970).Google Scholar
Uchino, K. and Nomura, S., Ferroelectric Lett. 44, 55 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samara, G.A., Phys. Rev. 151, 378 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagantsev, A.K., Pawlaczyk, C.Z., Brooks, K., and Setter, N., Integr. Ferroelectric 4, 1 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, S.B., Lu, C.J., Liu, J.S., Shen, H.M., and Wang, Y.N., Phys. Rev. B 54, R14337 (1996).Google Scholar
Kim, H.J., Oh, S.H., and Jang, H.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3195 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S., Hishita, S., Kang, Y.M., and Baik, S., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 5604 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar