Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:32:50.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of indenter tip geometry and indentation contact area for depth-sensing indentation experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. W. McElhaney
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
J. J. Vlassak
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
W. D. Nix
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Get access

Abstract

The phenomena of pile-up and sink-in associated with nanoindentation have been found to have large effects on the measurements of the indentation modulus and hardness of copper. Pile-up (or sink-in) leads to contact areas that are greater than (or less than) the cross-sectional area of the indenter at a given depth. These effects lead to errors in the absolute measurement of mechanical properties by nanoindentation. To account for these effects, a new method of indenter tip shape calibration has been developed; it is based on measurements of contact compliance as well as direct SEM observations and measurements of the areas of large indentations. Application of this calibration technique to strain-hardened (pile-up) and annealed (sink-in) copper leads to a unique tip shape calibration for the diamond indenter itself, as well as to a material parameter, a, which characterizes the extent of pile-up or sink-in. Thus the shape of the indenter tip and nature of the material response are separated in this calibration method. Using this approach, it is possible to make accurate absolute measurements of hardness and indentation modulus by nanoindentation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Pethica, J. B., Hutchings, R., and Oliver, W. C., Philos. Mag. A 48, 593 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bulychev, S. I., Alekhin, V. P., Shorshorov, M. K., Ternovskii, A. P., Shnyrev, and G. D., Zavodskaya Laboratoriya 41, 1137 (1975).Google Scholar
3.Bulychev, S. I. and Alekhin, V. P., Zavodskaya Laboratoriya 53, 76 (1987).Google Scholar
4.Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Doerner, M. F., Gardner, D. S., and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 845 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Doerner, M. F., Mechanical properties of metallic thin films on substrates using sub-micron indentation methods and thin film stress measurements techniques, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University (1987).Google Scholar
7.Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G.M, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Pharr, G. M., Oliver, W. C., and Brotzen, F. R., J. Mater. Res. 7, 613 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Pharr, G. M. and Oliver, W. C., MRS Bull. 17, 28 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Vlassak, J. J. and Nix, W. D., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 42, 1223 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Mayo, M. J., Siegel, R. W., Liao, Y. X., and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 7, 973 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Vlassak, J. J. and Nix, W. D., Philos. Mag. A 67, 1045 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Baker, S. P. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 9, 3131 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar