Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:23:37.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of strength and toughness of ceramic/metal laminates using interface design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Z. Chen  and
J.J. Mecholsky Jr.
Z. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
J.J. Mecholsky Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Get access

Abstract

The fracture strength and toughness of alumina can be increased by lamination with strategically placed nickel layers and by controlling the geometry of the interfaces. This paper describes the interface design of a ceramic/metal bonded system produced by changing the surface topography of the interface between the metal and ceramic layers in order to vary the strength of bonding. The tortuosity of the interface is described quantitatively using fractal geometry. Experiments and models of single ductile layer laminates show that the work of fracture of ductile layers which contribute to the increment of toughness of ceramic/metal laminates is dependent on the tortuosity of the interface. The more tortuous the interface, the stronger the laminate; the smoother the interface, the tougher the laminate. The results are used to design a ceramic/metal multilayer composite. The strength and toughness of the laminates can be controlled by the tortuosity of the interface and characterized using the fractal dimension.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 8 , Issue 9 , September 1993 , pp. 2362 - 2369
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Chen, Z. and Mecholsky, J. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (5), 12581264 (1993).Google Scholar
2Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (2), 187–206 (1990).Google Scholar
3Dieter, G. E., Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
4Ashby, M. F., Blunt, F. J., and Bannister, M., Acta Metall. 37 (7), 1947–1957 (1989).Google Scholar
5Bannister, M. and Ashby, M. F., Acta Metall. 39 (11), 2575–2582 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Trumble, K. P. and Riihle, M., Acta Metall. 39 (8), 1915–1924 (1991).Google Scholar
7Nicholas, M. G., Designing Interfaces, edited by Peteves, S.P. (Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York, 1988), pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
8Sapoval, B., Rosso, M., and Gouyet, J. F., Fractal Aspects of Materials, edited by Laibowitz, R. B., Mandelbrot, B. B., and Passoja, D. E. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985).Google Scholar
9Mecholsky, J. J., Passoja, D. E., and Feinberg-Ringel, K. S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (1), 60–65 (1989).Google Scholar
10Hashin, Z. and Rosen, B. W., Fiber Composite Analysis and Design (Composite Materials and Laminates, Vol. I), 1983, DOT/FAA/CT-85/6, Pg. 3-1-148–3-108-247.Google Scholar