Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:03:22.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compressive properties of bulk metallic glass with small aspect ratio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

F.F. Wu
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
Z.F. Zhang*
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
S.X. Mao
Affiliation:
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China; and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The quasi-static compressive deformation behavior of a Vitreloy 1 bulk metallic glass (BMG) with an aspect ratio of 0.25 was investigated. It is found that the friction and the confinement at the specimen–loading platen interface will cause the dramatic increase in the compressive load, leading to higher compressive strength. In particular, the BMG specimens show great plastic-deformation ability, and plenty of interacted, deflected, wavy, or branched shear bands were observed on the surfaces after plastic deformation. The formation of the strongly interacted, deflected, wavy, or branched shear bands can be attributed to the triaxial stress state in the glassy specimens with a very small aspect ratio.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Inoue, A.: Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 48, 279 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Löffler, J.F.: Bulk metallic glasses. Intermetallics. 11, 529 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Wang, W.H., Dong, C., and Shek, C.H.: Bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 44, 45 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Salimon, A.I., Ashby, M.F., Brechet, Y., and Greer, A.L.: Bulk metallic glasses: What are they good for? Mater. Sci. Eng., A 375–377, 385 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Bruck, H.A., Christman, T., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L.: Quasi-static constitutive behavior of Zr41.25Ti13.75Ni10Cu12.5Be22.5 bulk amorphous-alloys. Scripta Metall. Mater. 30, 429 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Bruck, H.A., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L.: The dynamic compressive behavior of beryllium bearing bulk metallic glasses. J. Mater. Res. 11, 503 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Choi-Yim, H. and Johnson, W.L.: Bulk metallic glass matrix composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3808 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Conner, R.D., Dandliker, R.B., and Johnson, W.L.: Mechanical properties of tungsten and steel fiber reinforced Zr41.25Ti13.75Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 metallic glass matrix composites. Acta Mater. 46, 6089 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Bae, D.H., Lee, M.H., Kim, D.H., and Sordelet, D.J.: Plasticity in Ni59Zr20Ti16Si2Sn3 metallic glass matrix composites containing brass fibers synthesized by warm extrusion of powders. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2312 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L.: Microstructure controlled shear band pattern formation and enhanced plasticity of bulk metallic glasses containing in situ formed ductile phase dendrite dispersions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2901 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11He, G., Eckert, J., and Löser, W.: Stability, phase transformation and deformation behavior of Ti-base metallic glass and composites. Acta Mater. 51, 1621 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Wu, F.F., Zhang, Z.F., Peker, A., Mao, S.X., Das, J., and Eckert, J.: Strength asymmetry of ductile dendrites reinforced Zr- and Ti-based composites. J. Mater. Res. 21, 2331 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Conner, R.D., Li, Y., Nix, W.D., and Johnson, W.L.: Shear band spacing under bending of Zr-based metallic glass plates. Acta Mater. 52, 2429 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Zhang, Z.F., Zhang, H., Pan, X.F., Das, J., and Eckert, J.: Effect of aspect ratio on the compressive deformation and fracture behaviour of Zr-based bulk metallic glass. Philos. Mag. Lett. 85, 513 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Bei, H., Xie, S., and George, E.P.: Softening caused by profuse shear banding in a bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 105503 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Brothers, A.H. and Dunand, D.C.: Syntactic bulk metallic glass foam. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1108 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Brothers, A.H. and Dunand, D.C.: Plasticity and damage in cellular amorphous metals. Acta Mater. 53, 4427 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Yokoyama, Y., Yamano, K., Fukaura, K., Sunada, H., and Inoue, A.: Enhancement of ductility and plasticity of Zr55Cu30Al10Ni5 bulk glassy alloy by cold rolling. Mater. Trans. 42, 623 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Davis, L.A. and Kavesh, S.: Deformation and fracture of an amorphous metallic alloy at high pressure. J. Mater. Sci. 10, 453 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Lewandowski, J.J. and Lowhaphandu, P.: Effects of hydrostatic pressure on the flow and fracture of a bulk amorphous metal. Philos. Mag. A 82, 3427 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Lu, J. and Ravichandran, G.: Pressure-dependent flow behavior of Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 18, 2039 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Sunny, G.P., Prakash, V., and Lewandowski, J.J.: Results from a novel insert design for high strain-rate compression of a bulk metallic glass, in Proceedings of the 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, 2006).Google Scholar
23Sunny, G.P., Yuan, F., Lewandowski, J.J., and Prakash, V.: Dynamic stress-strain response of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass, in Proceedings of the 2005 SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics (Society of Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, 2005).Google Scholar
24Subhash, G., Dowding, R.J., and Kecskes, L.J.: Characterization of uniaxial compressive response of bulk amorphous Zr-Ti-Cu-Ni-Be alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 334, 33 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Lu, J., Ravichandran, G., and Johnson, W.L.: Deformation behavior of the Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glass over a wide range of strain-rates and temperatures. Acta Mater. 51, 3429 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Zhang, Z.F., Eckert, J., and Schultz, L.: Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 51, 1167 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Zhang, Z.F., Brunner, D., Scheu, C., and Rühle, M.: Deformation and fracture mechanisms of Al2O3/Nb/Al2O3 composites under compression. Z. Metallkd. 96, 62 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Avitzur, B.: Handbook of Metal Forming (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
29Chen, H., He, Y., Shiflet, G.J., and Poon, S.J.: Deformation-induced nanocrystal formation in shear bands of amorphous-alloys. Nature 367, 541 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Zhang, Z.F., Zhang, H., Shen, B.L., Inoue, A., and Eckert, J.: Shear fracture and fragmentation mechanisms of bulk metallic glasses. Philos. Mag. Lett. 86, 643 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Zhang, Z.F. and Eckert, J.: Unified tensile fracture criterion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 094301 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed