Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:58:46.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Auger electron spectroscopy analysis of SiC-whisker surfaces and SiC-whisker/alumina interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

D.N. Braski
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak ridge, National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6064
K.B. Alexander
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak ridge, National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6064
Get access

Abstract

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) has been used to examine as-received and oxidized silicon carbide whiskers and their respective whisker/matrix interfaces after fabrication into SiC-whisker-reinforced alumina composites. As-received whisker surfaces exhibited a 2–3 nm-thick near-surface region that was C-rich. Oxygen was detected at the outer surface, but diminished to near zero within 25 nm of the surface. Oxidized whiskers had 60 nm-thick SiO2 surface layers, which was in agreement with the transmission electron microscopy observations. The whisker/matrix interfaces in both composites consisted of thin (<0.5 nm) layers of a C-Si-O noncrystalline material. The thick SiO2 layers on the oxidized whiskers were ejected from the interfaces during hot-pressing. It was concluded that (i) the higher toughness of the composite fabricated with as-received SiC whiskers may be related to the higher C and lower O in its SiCw/Al2O3 interfaces, and (ii) interface composition cannot be reliably predicted using the surface composition of free whiskers prior to fabrication.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Becher, P. F. and Wei, G. C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 (12), C267 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Becher, P. F., Hsueh, C. H., Angelini, P., and Tiegs, T. N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71 (12), 1050 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Smith, S. M., Singh, J. P., and Scattergood, R. O., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (2), 497 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Yasuda, E., Akatsu, T., and Tanabe, Y., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., Int. Ed. 99, 51 (1991).Google Scholar
5Akatsu, T., Tanabe, Y., Matsuura, S., Yamada, M., Ishii, H., Munakata, M., and Yasuda, E., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., Int. Ed. 99, 416 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Tiegs, T. N., Becher, P. F., and Harris, L. A., in Ceramics Microstructure ‘86: Role of Interfaces, edited by Pask, J. A. and Evans, A. G. (Plenum Press, Mater. Sci. Res., New York, 1987), Vol. 21, p. 911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Karasek, K. R., Bradley, S. A., Donner, J. T., Yeh, H. C., Schienle, J. L., and Fang, H. T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (10), 1907 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Homeny, J., Vaughn, W. L., and Ferber, M. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (2), 394 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Iio, S., Watanabe, M., Matsubara, M., and Matsuo, Y., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (10), 1880 (1989).Google Scholar
10Braue, W., Carpenter, R. W., and Smith, D. J., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 2949 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Campbell, G. H., Ruhle, M., Dalgleish, B. J., and Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. 73 (3), 521 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Alexander, K. B., Angelini, P., and Becher, P. F., Ceram. Trans. 19, 245 (1991).Google Scholar
13Brennan, J. J. and Nutt, S. R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75 (5), 1205 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Alexander, K. B., Angelini, P., and Becher, P. F., in High Resolution Electron Microscopy of Defects in Materials, edited by Sinclair, R., Smith, D. J., and Dahmen, U. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 183, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 273.Google Scholar
15Wei, G. C. and Becher, P. F., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 64 (2), 298 (1985).Google Scholar
16Hwang, S-L. and Becher, P. F., Abstracts for the 96th Annual Am. Ceramic Soc. Meeting & Exposition, April 24-28, 1994, Indianapolis, IN (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1994), p. 155.Google Scholar