Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:52:01.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomistic simulation of the influence of pre-existing stress on the interpretation of nanoindentation data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2004

J. David Schall  and
Donald W. Brenner
J. David Schall
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Donald W. Brenner
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Get access

Abstract

By using molecular dynamics simulations, we have accurately determined the true contact area during plastic indentation of materials under an applied in-plane stress. We found that the mean pressure calculated from the true contact area varied slightly with applied pre-stress with higher values in compression than in tension and that the modulus calculated from the true contact area is essentially independent of the press-stress level in the substrate. These findings are largely consistent with the findings of Tsui, Pharr, and Oliver. On the other hand, if the contact area is estimated from approximate formulae, the contact area is underestimated and shows a strong dependence on the pre-stress level. When it is used to determine mean pressure and modulus, the empirically determined area leads to large errors. Our simulations demonstrate that this phenomenon, first reported for macroscale hardness measurements dating back to 1932, also exists at the nanometer-scale contact areas, apparently scaling over 10 orders of magnitude in contact area, from ∼mm2 to ∼100 nm2.

Keywords

Elastic propertiesNanoindentationComputer simulation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 11 , November 2004 , pp. 3172 - 3180
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D.: A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Shenderova, O.A., Mewkill, J.P. and Brenner, D.W.: Nanoindentation as a probe of nanoscale residual stress. Atomistic Simulation Results. Molecular Simulation 25, 81 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Jarausch, K.F., Kiely, J.D., Houston, J.E. and Russell, P.E.: Defect-dependent elasticity: Nanoindentation as a probe of stress state. J. Mater. Res. 15, 1693 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Gilman, J.J. in The Science of Hardness Testing and Its Research Applications, edited by Westbrook, J.H. and Conrad, H. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973), pp. 51–74Google Scholar
5Pethica, J.B. in Ion Implantation into Metals, edited by Asheworth, V., Grant, W., and Procter, R. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K., 1982), pp. 147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Loubet, J.L., Georges, J.M., Marchesini, O. and Meille, G.: Vickers indentation curves of magnesium oxide (MgO). J. Tribology 106, 43 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Newey, D., Wilkins, M.A. and Pollock, H.M.: An ultra-low-load penetration hardness tester. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 15, 119 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Stone, D., LaFontaine, W.R., Alexopoulos, P., Wu, T-W. and Li, Che-Yu: An investigation of hardness and adhesion of sputter-deposited aluminum on silicon by utilizing acontinuous indentation test. J. Mater. Res. 3, 141 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V.: A simple predictive model for spherical indentation. J. Mater. Res. 8, 297 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Kokubo, S.: Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University. 21, 256 (1932).Google Scholar
12Sines, G. and Carlson, R.: Hardness measurements for determination of residual stresses. ASTM Bulletin 180, 35 (1952).Google Scholar
13Hill, G.U. Oppel amd P.W.: Strain measurements of the Root of Cracks and Notches Proceeding of the Society for Experimental Stress Analysis 21, 206 (1964).Google Scholar
14Simes, T.R., Mellor, S.G. and Hills, D.A.: A note on the influence of residual-stress on measured hardness. J. Strain Analysis 19, 135 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15LaFontaine, W.R.Paszkiet, C.A.Korhonen, M.A., and Li, Che-Yu: Residual stress measurements of thin aluminum metallizations by continuous indentation and x-ray stress measurement techniques. J. Mater. Res. 6, 2084 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Tsui, T.Y., Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part I. Experimental studies in an aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Res. 11, 752 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part II. Finite element simulations. J. Mater. Res. 11, 760 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Chen, X. and Vlassak, J.J.: Numerical study on the measurement of thin film mechanical properties by means of nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 16, 2974 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Plimpton, S.J. and Hendrickson, B.A.: Parallel molecular dynamics with the embedded atom method in Materials Theory and Modelling, edited by Broughton, J., Bristowe, P., and Newsam, J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 291 Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), p. 37.Google Scholar
20Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I.: Embedded atom method: Derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals. Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Foiles, S.M., Baskes, M.I. and Daw, M.S.: Embedded atom method functions for the FCC metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt and their alloys. Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Kelchner, C.L., Plimpton, S.J. and Hamilton, J.C.: Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys. Rev. B 58, 11085 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Zimmerman, J.A., Kelchner, C.L., Klein, P.A., Hamilton, J.C. and Foiles, S.M.: Surface step effects on nanoindentation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 165507 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Lilleodden, E.T., Zimmerman, J.A., Foiles, S.M. and Nix, W.D.: Atomistic simulation of elastic deformation and dislocation nucleation during nanoindentation J. Mech. and Phys. Solids 51, 901 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Lilleodden, E.T. in Indentation induced plasticity of thin metal films. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 2001Google Scholar
26Kubo, R.: Fluctuation-dissipation theorem. Rep. Prog. Theor. Phys. 33, 425 (1965).Google Scholar
27Pharr, G.M. and Bolshakov, A.: Understanding nanoindentation unloading curves. J. Mater. Res. 17, 2660 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Frenkel, J.: Z. Phys. 37, 572 (1926).CrossRefGoogle Scholar