Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:09:08.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anisotropic fatigue behavior of rolled Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Seong-Gu Hong*
Affiliation:
Division of Industrial Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 305-340, Republic of Korea
Sung Hyuk Park
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Republic of Korea
Yong-Hak Huh
Affiliation:
Division of Industrial Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Daejeon 305-340, Republic of Korea
Chong Soo Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Republic of Korea
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
b)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The anisotropy in the fatigue behavior of rolled Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy between the rolling direction and normal direction to the rolling plane was investigated. The {10-12} twinning–detwinning characteristics were found to play key roles in the anisotropic fatigue deformation behavior by inducing a change in the predominant plastic deformation mechanism, which controlled the flow stress and finally influenced the fatigue resistance by generating mean stress. Energy-based approach was successfully used to describe anisotropic fatigue life behavior.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Barnett, M.R.Twinning and the ductility of magnesium alloys (Part I): “Tension” twins. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 464, 1 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Jiang, L., Jonas, J.J., Luo, A.A., Sachdev, A.K., Godet, S.Influence of {10-12} extension twinning on the flow behavior of AZ31 Mg alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 445–446, 302 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lv, F., Yang, F., Duan, Q.Q., Luo, T.J., Yang, Y.S., Li, S.X., Zhang, Z.F.Tensile and low-cycle fatigue properties of Mg-2.8% Al-1.1% Zn-0.4% Mn alloy along the transverse and rolling directions. Scr. Mater. 61, 887 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chino, Y., Kimura, K., Mabuchi, M.Deformation characteristics at room temperature under biaxial tensile stress in textured AZ31 Mg alloy sheets. Acta Mater. 57, 1476 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Agnew, S.R., Duygulu, Ö.Plastic anisotropy and the role of non-basal slip in magnesium alloy AZ31B. Int. J. Plast. 21, 1161 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Park, S.H., Hong, S.G., Lee, C.S.Activation mode dependent {10-12} twinning characteristics in a polycrystalline magnesium alloy. Scr. Mater. 62, 202 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lou, X.Y., Li, M., Boger, R.K., Agnew, S.R., Wagoner, R.H.Hardening evolution of AZ31B Mg sheet. Int. J. Plast. 23, 44 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Cáceres, C.H., Sumitomo, T., Veidt, M.Pseudoelastic behaviour of cast magnesium AZ91 alloy under cyclic loading–unloading. Acta Mater. 51, 6211 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Wang, Y.N., Huang, J.C.The role of twinning and untwinning in yielding behavior in hot-extruded Mg–Al–Zn alloy. Acta Mater. 55, 897 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Yin, S.M., Yang, H.J., Li, S.X., Wu, S.D., Yang, F.Cyclic deformation behavior of as-extruded Mg–3%Al–1%Zn. Scr. Mater. 58, 751 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Wu, L., Jain, A., Brown, D.W., Stoica, G.M., Agnew, S.R., Clausen, B., Fielden, D.E., Liaw, P.K.Twinning–detwinning behavior during the strain-controlled low-cycle fatigue testing of a wrought magnesium alloy, ZK60A. Acta Mater. 56, 688 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hong, S.G., Park, S.H., Lee, C.S.Enhancing the fatigue property of rolled AZ31 magnesium alloy by controlling {10-12} twinning–detwinning characteristics. J. Mater. Res. 25, (4)784 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Evans, P.R.V., Owen, N.B., McCartney, L.N.Mean stress effects on fatigue crack growth and failure in a rail steel. Eng. Fract. Mech. 6, 183 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Yin, S.M., Yang, F., Yang, X.M., Wu, S.D., Li, S.X., Li, G.Y.The role of twinning–detwinning on fatigue fracture morphology of Mg–3%Al–1%Zn alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 494, 397 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Coffin, L.F. Jr.A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses in a ductile metal. ASME Trans. 76, 931 (1954)Google Scholar
16.Morrow, J.D.Cyclic plastic strain energy and fatigue of metals. ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 378, 45 (1964)Google Scholar
17.Golos, K.M., Ellyin, F.A total strain energy density theory for cumulative fatigue damage. ASME J. Press. Ves. Tech. 110, 36 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hong, S.G., Lee, S.B., Byun, T.S.Temperature effect on the low-cycle fatigue behavior of type 316L stainless steel: Cyclic non-stabilization and an invariable fatigue parameter. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 457, 139 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kandil, F.A.Potential ambiguity in the determination of the plastic strain range component in LCF testing. Int. J. Fatigue 21, 1013 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar