Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:41:55.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of the isotropy of epoxy polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Edwin M. Odom  and
Donald F. Adams
Edwin M. Odom
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83843
Donald F. Adams
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82070
Get access

Abstract

Measurements of the engineering constants E, G, and v are routinely made for polymeric materials. If these materials are isotropic, these measurements should satisfy the relationship G = E/2(1 + v). However, many past measurements have indicated that this relationship is not satisfied. This raises questions about the assumptions of material isotropy and the applicability of Hooke's law. The methods used to measure these engineering constants for a number of different polymers are first described. Then, new results obtained in the current investigation are presented, indicating that the elastic constants do in fact satisfy the isotropic relationship for strains up to 0.5%. However, it is shown that at strain levels above this level, the relationship between stress and strain is nonlinear.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 12 , December 1992 , pp. 3352 - 3358
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Dusek, K., Plestil, J., Lednicky, F., and Lunak, S., Polymer 19, 393–397 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Ward, I. M., Mechanical Properties of Solid Polymers (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England, 1979).Google Scholar
3Sokolnikoff, I. S., Mathematical Theory of Elasticity (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1956).Google Scholar
4“Hercules 3501–6 Epoxy,” Hercules, Inc., Bacchus Works, Magna, UT, 1990.Google Scholar
5Browning, C. E., “The Mechanisms of Elevated Temperature Property Losses in High Performance Structural Epoxy Resin Matrix Materials After Exposures to High Humidity Conditions,” Report AFML–TR–76–153, Air Force Materials Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, March 1977.Google Scholar
6Odom, E. M. and Adams, D. F., “A Study of Polymer Matrix Fatigue Properties,” Report UWME–DR–301–103–1, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, June 1983.Google Scholar
7Augl, J.M., “Moisture Effects on the Mechanical Properties of Hercules 3501–6 Epoxy Resin,” Report NSWC TR–79–41, Naval Surface Weapons Center, Silver Spring, MD, March 1979.Google Scholar
8Grimes, G. C. and Adams, D. F., “Investigation of Compression Fatigue Properties of Advanced Composites,” Northrop Technical Report NOR 79–17, Naval Air Systems Command Contract N00019–77–C–0519, October 1979.Google Scholar
9Crane, D. A. and Adams, D. F., “Finite Element Micromechanical Analysis of a Unidirectional Composite Including Longitudinal Shear Loading,” Report UWME–DR–001–104–1, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, December 1980.Google Scholar
10Walrath, D. E. and Adams, D. F., “Fatigue Behavior of Hercules 3501–6 Epoxy Resin,” Report NADC 78139–60, Naval Air Systems Command, Warminster, PA, January 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Zimmerman, R. S. and Adams, D.F., “Investigation of the Relations Between Neat Resin and Advanced Composite Mechanical Properties,” Report NASA CR-172303, Volume I-Results, Volume II-Appendices, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, November 1984.Google Scholar
12Zimmerman, R. S. and Adams, D. F., “Mechanical Properties Testing of Candidate Polymer Matrix Materials for Use in High Performance Composites,” Report NASA CR–177970, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, December 1985.Google Scholar
13Zimmerman, R.S. and Adams, D.F., “Mechanical Properties of Neat Polymer Matrix Materials and Their Unidirectional Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Composites,” Report NASA CR–181631, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, December 1988.Google Scholar
14Coguill, S. L. and Adams, D. F., “Mechanical Properties of Several Neat Polymer Matrix Materials and Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites,” Report NASA CR–181805, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, April 1989.Google Scholar
15Bauschinger, J., Civilingenier, Leipzig 25, 81–124 (1879).Google Scholar
16Richards, J. T., “An Evaluation of Several Static and Dynamic Methods for Determining Elastic Moduli,” Symposium on Determination of Elastic Constants, ASTM STP 129, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA (1952).Google Scholar
17Köster, W. and Franz, H., Metall. Rev. 6 (21), 1–55 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18“EPON 828 Resin,” Shell Development Company, Houston, TX, 1988.Google Scholar
19Drzal, L. T., Rich, M. J., Koenig, M. F., and Lloyd, P. F., J. Adhesion 16, 133–152 (1983).Google Scholar
20Plexiglas (Rohm and Haas, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, 1990).Google Scholar
21“Techkits Type A-12 Adhesive,” Techkits, Inc., Demarest, NJ, 1988.Google Scholar
22Popov, E. P., Introduction to Mechanics of Solids (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1978).Google Scholar
23Micro Measurements, Measurements Group, Inc., Raleigh, NC, 1989.Google Scholar
24Moore, D. S. and McCabe, G. P., Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
25Odom, E.M. and Adams, D.F., “The Mechanical Response of a Thermosetting Polymer,” Report UW–CMRG–R–91–104, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, May 1991.Google Scholar
26Hertzberg, R. W., Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1976).Google Scholar