Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:46:40.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The value of outside director experience to firm strategies: Evidence from joint ventures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2014

Jung-Ho Lai ,
Li-Yu Chen  and
I-Ju Chen
Jung-Ho Lai
Affiliation:
Department of Finance, National Taipei College of Business, Taiwan
Li-Yu Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, Soochow University, Taiwain
I-Ju Chen
Affiliation:
Division of Finance, Yuan-Ze University, Taiwain
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of outside director experience on the performance of a firm's joint venture (JV) engagements, a type of strategic move where the influence of board remains under-investigated despite directors’ active participation in the decision-making process. By examining the direct linkage between director experience and strategic performance, our research presents the first direct evidence of the value outside director experience has for a firm's strategic engagements; this has previously been exclusively assessed by indirect indicators. We address this important issue in the following three ways. First, we explore what type of director experience contributes most to JV outcomes. Second, we investigate what circumstantial factors significantly influence the value of director experience. Lastly, we analyze whether incentive mechanisms moderate the relationship between director experience and firm performance. The results confirm the value of director experience gained from JV engagements but not from relevant industries. In addition, executive experience and the industry affiliation of the JV significantly moderate the value of director experience. Finally, experienced directors with large shareholdings outperform those with experience but limited stakes in the firms’ equity, justifying the necessity to motivate directors’ governance efforts despite their existing fiduciary obligation to shareholders. Our study contributes to agency theory by indicating that director experience holds a significant influence on a firm's strategic performance, an issue which has long been neglected in agency-based governance research. It also contributes to resource-dependence theory by providing a direct measurement of directors’ experiential assets, which have so far been exclusively assessed by indirect indicators. Finally, findings from this study can elucidate the long-standing question of how a firm can realize the purported benefits JVs provide by introducing a vital yet rarely explored factor: board experience.

Keywords

joint venturesboard of directorsexperienceresource-dependence theorycorporate governance
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 387 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor, MI University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.Google Scholar
Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R. (2002). Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 92–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierly, P. E., Gallagher, S. (2007). Explaining alliance partner selection: Fit, trust and strategic expediency. Long Range Planning, 40, 134–153.Google Scholar
Brown, S. J., Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 533–545.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 639–660.Google Scholar
Carter, C. B., Lorsch, J. W. (2004). Back to the drawing board: Designing corporate boards for a complex world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Chan, S., Kensinger, J., Keown, A., Martin, J. (1997). Do strategic alliances create value? Journal of Financial Economics, 46(2), 199–221.Google Scholar
Chang, S. C., Chen, S. S. (2002). The wealth effect of domestic joint ventures: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S. C., Chen, S. S., Lai, J. H. (2008). The wealth effect of US-Japan alliance. Financial Management, 37, 271–301.Google Scholar
Chen, H. L. (2011). Does board independence influence the top management team? Evidence from strategic decisions toward internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 334–350.Google Scholar
Chen, S. K., Lee, H. C., Yeo, G. (2000). Investment opportunities, free cash flow and market reaction to international joint ventures. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1747–1765.Google Scholar
Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, A., Calantone, R. J., Griffith, D. A. (2011). Strategic change and termination of interfirm partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 32(4), 402–423.Google Scholar
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28, 371–382.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.Google Scholar
Das, S., Sen, P., Sengupta, S. (1998). Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 27–41.Google Scholar
Das, T. K., Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.Google Scholar
Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383–397.Google Scholar
Fama, E., Jensen, M. (1983). Agency problem and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., Canella, A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams and boards. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glaister, K., Buckley, P. (1996). Strategic motives for international alliance formation. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 301–332.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–1493.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., Westphal, J. D. (1999). Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the contents of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 473–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haunschild, P. (1993). Interorganizational imitation: the impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 564–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, K., Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of bord capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.Google Scholar
Hertzel, M., Smith, R. L. (1993). Market discounts and shareholder gains for placing equity privately. Journal of Finance, 48(2), 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.Google Scholar
Hsieh, L. Y., Rodrigues, S. B., Child, J. (2010). Risk perception and post-formation governance in international joint ventures in Taiwan: The perspective of the foreign partner. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 288–303.Google Scholar
Huse, M., Hoskisson, R., Zattoni, A., Viganò, R. (2011). New perspectives on board research: Changing the research agenda. Journal of Management and Governance, 15, 5–28.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.Google Scholar
Jiang, M. S., Chu, R., Pan, Y. (2011). Anticipated duration of international joint ventures: A transaction cost perspective. Journal of International Management, 17(2), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. L., Cullen, J. B., Sakano, T., Bronson, J. W. (2001). Drivers and outcomes of parent company intervention in IJV management: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Research, 52(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. L., Daily, G. M., Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 409–438.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39(1), 232–262.Google Scholar
Judge, W. Q. Jr., Zeithaml, G. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 766–794.Google Scholar
Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 747–767.Google Scholar
Kang, J. K., Stulz, R. M. (1996). How different is Japanese corporate finance? An investigation of the information content of new security issues. Review of Financial Studies, 9, 109–139.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (1998). A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kor, Y. Y. (2003). Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organization Science, 14(6), 707–719.Google Scholar
Kor, Y. Y., Sundaramurthy, C. (2009). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4), 981–1006.Google Scholar
Kroll, M., Walters, B., Wright, P. (2008). Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 363–382.Google Scholar
Lang, L., Stulz, R., Walkling, R. A. (1991). A test of the free cash flow hypothesis: The case of bidder returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 29, 315–336.Google Scholar
Maassen, G. F., Van den Bosch, F. (1999). On the supposed independence of two-tier boards: Formal structure and reality in the Netherlands. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(1), 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machold, S., Huse, M., Minichilli, A., Nordqvist, M. (2011). Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: A team production approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4), 368–383.Google Scholar
Marquardt, D. W., Snee, R. D. (1975). Ridge regression in practice. The American Statistician, 29(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. The Journal of Finance, 62, 1851–1889.Google Scholar
Merchant, H., Schendel, D. (2000). How do international joint ventures create shareholder value? Strategic Management Journal, 21(7), 723–737.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, N. K., Mezias, J. M., Song, J. (2004). A resource-based view of strategic alliances and firm value in the electronic marketplace. Journal of Management, 30(1), 7–27.Google Scholar
Park, S. H., Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organizational Science, 12(1), 37–53.Google Scholar
Payne, G. T., Benson, G. S., Finegold, D. L. (2009). Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 704–731.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Philip, B., Pinar, G., Jeffrey, R. (2012). Corporate social and financial performance re-examined: Industry effects in a linear mixed model analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 367–388.Google Scholar
Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.Google Scholar
Ren, H., Gray, B., Kim, K. (2009). Performance of international joint ventures: What factors really make a difference and how? Journal of Management, 35(3), 805–832.Google Scholar
Reuer, J. J., Koza, M. P. (2000). Asymmetric information and joint venture performance: Theory and evidence for domestic and international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 81–88.Google Scholar
Roberts, J., McNulty, T., Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16, 5–26.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, M., Netter, J. (1990). Shareholder wealth effects of Ohio antitakeover law. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4, 373–383.Google Scholar
Schefczyk, M., Gerpott, T. J. (2001). Management support for portfolio companies of venture capital firms: An empirical study of German venture capital investments. British Journal of Management, 12(3), 201–216.Google Scholar
Shen, W. (2005). Improve board effectiveness: The need for incentives. British Journal of Management, 16, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Cognitive conceptions of expertise. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 149–162). Cambridge, MA: AAAI/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talay, M. B., Dalgic, O., Dalgic, T. (2010). Shareholder value creation in international joint ventures: The case of the US automotive industry. Strategic Management Review, 4(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Tosi, H. L., Shen, W., Gentry, R. J. (2003). Why outsiders on boards can't solve the corporate governance problem. Organizational Dynamics, 32(2), 180–192.Google Scholar
Van Veen, K., Elbertsen, J. (2008). Governance regimes and nationality diversity in corporate boards: A comparative study of Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 386–399.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D., Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1113–1137.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D., Khanna, P. (2003). Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 361–398.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wright, P., Kroll, M., Elenkov, D. (2002). Acquisition returns, increase in firm size, and chief executive officer compensation: The moderating role of monitoring. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 599–608.Google Scholar
Yoo, J. W., Kim, K. (2012). Board competence and the top management team's external ties for performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(2), 142–158.Google Scholar