Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:01:51.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To be philanthropic when being international: Evidence from Chinese family firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2017

Xingqiang Du ,
Quan Zeng  and
Yingying Chang
Xingqiang Du*
Affiliation:
School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
Quan Zeng
Affiliation:
School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
Yingying Chang
Affiliation:
School of Business Administration, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the influence of internationalization on corporate philanthropy, and further investigates the moderating effect of political participation of CEO (Chief Executive Officer). Using a sample of Chinese family firms and hand-collected data on corporate philanthropy, internationalization, and CEO’s political participation, our findings show that internationalization is significantly positively associated with corporate philanthropy, suggesting that internationalization plays an important role in promoting corporate philanthropy because of the mounting interaction of corporate philanthropic consciousness among multinational companies. In addition, CEO’s political participation reinforces the positive association between internationalization and corporate philanthropy. Above findings are robust to a variety of sensitivity tests and further our conclusions are still valid after controlling for the endogeneity between internationalization and corporate philanthropy.

Keywords

corporate philanthropyinternationalizationCEO’s political participationChinese family firms
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 424 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acs, Z. J., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2005). The entrepreneurship-philanthropy nexus: Implication for internationalization. Management International Review, 45(3), 111–144.Google Scholar
Aggerholm, H. K., & Trapp, N. L. (2014). Three tiers of CSR: An instructive means of understanding and guiding contemporary company approaches to CSR? Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(3), 235–247.Google Scholar
Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57–116.Google Scholar
Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229–241.Google Scholar
Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2012). Retail philanthropy: Firm size, industry, and business cycle. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 435–448.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. R., Li, J. H., Harrison, R. T., & Robson, P. J. (2003). The increasing role of small business in the Chinese economy. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(3), 310–316.Google Scholar
Atkinson, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1988). Stock ownership and company contributions to charity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 82–100.Google Scholar
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86.Google Scholar
Basmann, R. L. (1960). On finite sample distributions of generalized classical linear identifiability test statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55(292), 650–659.Google Scholar
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1), 6–18.Google Scholar
Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. (2009). Corporate charitable giving, multinational companies and countries of concern. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 575–596.Google Scholar
Brϕnn, P. S. (2006). Building corporate brands through community involvement: Is it exportable? The case of the Ronald McDonald House in Norway. Journal of Marketing Communications, 12(4), 309–320.Google Scholar
Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877.Google Scholar
Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Family firms. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2167–2202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calof, J. L., & Beamish, P. W. (1995). Adapting to foreign markets: Explaining internationalization. International Business Review, 4(2), 115–131.Google Scholar
Campbell, D., Moore, G., & Metzger, M. (2002). Corporate philanthropy in the U.K 1985–2000: Some empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1), 29–41.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. T., Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 84–106.Google Scholar
Cassiman, B., & Golovko, E. (2011). Innovation and internationalization through exports. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 56–75.Google Scholar
Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2009). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms (Working paper). Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=966379.Google Scholar
Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business and Society, 44(4), 415–441.Google Scholar
Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 131–144.Google Scholar
Chen, M. J. (2001). Inside Chinese business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 381–410.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Feijen, E., & Laeven, L. (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 554–580.Google Scholar
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4), 303–327.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., & D’Agostino, R. B. Jr. (1990). A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. American Statistician, 44(4), 316–321.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
Ding, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2008). The financial and operating performance of Chinese family-owned listed firms. Management International Review, 48(3), 297–318.Google Scholar
Du, X. (2015). Is corporate philanthropy used as environmental misconduct dressing? Evidence from Chinese family-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 192(2), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, X., Jian, W., Du, Y., Feng, W., & Zeng, Q. (2014). Religion, the nature of ultimate owner, and corporate philanthropic giving: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 235–256.Google Scholar
Du, X., & Luo, J.-H. (2016). Political connections, home formal institutions, and internationalization: Evidence from China. Management and Organization Review, 12(1), 103–133.Google Scholar
Du, X., Pei, H., Du, Y., & Zeng, Q. (2016). Media coverage, family ownership, and corporate philanthropic giving: Evidence from China. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(2), 224–253.Google Scholar
Du, X., Zeng, Q., & Du, Y. (2014). Do politically connected independent directors help Chinese listed private firms enter high-barrier industries? China Accounting and Finance Review, 16(4), 90–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. (1998). An overview of relations with national governments. New Political Economy, 3(2), 280–284.Google Scholar
Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2010). Revisiting liability of foreignness: Socio-political costs facing Chinese multinationals in the US. In K. Sauvant (Ed.), Investing in the US: Is the US ready for foreign investment from China? (pp. 122–141). Cheltenham: Edward Edgar.Google Scholar
Ettenson, R., & Klein, J. G. (2005). The fallout from French nuclear testing in the South Pacific: A longitudinal study of consumer boycotts. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 199–224.Google Scholar
Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.Google Scholar
Fan, G., Wang, X., & Zhu, H. (2011). The report on the relative process of marketization of each region in China (pp. 259–288). Beijing: The Economics Science Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically-connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of Chinas newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.Google Scholar
Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102.Google Scholar
Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sense giving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1173–1193.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1991). Consumer boycotts: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Social Issues, 47(1), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329–346.Google Scholar
Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S. B., & Olsen, D. (2000). Products and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 51–80.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.Google Scholar
Graafland, J., & Zhang, L. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in China: Implementation and challenges. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(1), 34–49.Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.Google Scholar
Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046.Google Scholar
Gu, H., Ryan, C., Li, B., & Gao, W. (2013). Political connections, guanxiand adoption of CSR policies in the Chinese hotel industry: Is there a link? Tourism Management, 34, 231–235.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the US government. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 67–81.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. M. Jr, Miller, T., Hitt, M. A., & Salmador, M. P. (2013). The interrelationships among informal institutions, formal institutions, and inward foreign direct investment. Journal of Management, 39(2), 531–566.Google Scholar
Hunton, J. E., Hoitash, R., & Thibodeau, J. C. (2011). The relationship between perceived tone at the top and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4), 1190–1224.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (2005). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81(3), 525–540.Google Scholar
Jiang, G., Lee, C. M. C., & Yue, H. (2010). Tunneling through inter-corporate loans: The China experience. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Johnson, R., & Greening, D. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, J. (2013). The relationship between corporate diversification and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 94–109.Google Scholar
Kao, J. (1993). The worldwide web of Chinese business. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 24–36.Google Scholar
Keim, G. D., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1986). Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making: A review and contingency approach. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 828–843.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., & Milner, H. V. (1996). Internationalization and domestic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiran, R., & Sharma, A. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: A corporate strategy for new business opportunities. Journal of International Business Ethics, 4(1), 10–17.Google Scholar
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
Kwok, C. C. Y., & Reeb, D. M. (2000). Internationalization and firm risk: An upstream-downstream hypothesis. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 611–629.Google Scholar
LaFave, WR. (2000). Criminal law (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Group.Google Scholar
Larrieta-Rubín de Celis, I., Velasco-Balmaseda, E., Fernández de Bobadilla, S., Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., & Intxaurburu- Clemente, G. (2015). Does having women managers lead to increased gender equality practices in corporate social responsibility? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1), 91–110.Google Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Sakano, T., Stephens, C. U., & Victor, B. (1995). Corporate citizenship in Japan: Survey results from Japanese firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(2), 83–101.Google Scholar
Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283–299.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2001). Toward a cooperative view of MNC-host government relations: Building blocks and performance implications. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 401–419.Google Scholar
Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925–945.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.Google Scholar
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Mezias, J. M. (2002). Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 229–244.Google Scholar
Meznar, M. B., & Nigh, D. (1995). Buffer or bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs activities in American firms. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 975–996.Google Scholar
Nachum, L. (2003). Liability of foreignness in global competition? Financial service affiliates in the city of London. Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1187–1208.Google Scholar
National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Treadway Commission (1987). Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Retrieved from https://www.coso.org/Documents/NCFFR.pdf.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nybakk, E., & Panwar, R. (2015). Understanding instrumental motivations for social responsibility engagement in a micro-firm context. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1), 18–33.Google Scholar
Oksenberg, M. (2001). Chinas political system: Challenges of the twenty-first century. The China Journal, 45, 21–35.Google Scholar
Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, K., & Xu, C. (2005). Governing stock markets in transition economics: Lessons from China. American Law and Economics Review, 7(1), 184–210.Google Scholar
Portney, P. R. (2008). The (not so) new corporate social responsibility: An empirical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 261–275.Google Scholar
Ragodoo, N. J. (2009). CSR as a tool to fight against poverty: The case of Mauritius. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(1), 19–33.Google Scholar
Rehbein, K., Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (2004). Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted? Business & Society, 43(3), 239–267.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612.Google Scholar
Rowley, T. I., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.Google Scholar
Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity ‘begins at home’. Business and Society, 42(2), 169–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, C. M. (2000). Motives for corporate philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and political legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 363–375.Google Scholar
Sargan, J. D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393–415.Google Scholar
Schnietz, K. E., & Epstein, M. J. (2005). Exploring the financial value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility during a crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 327–345.Google Scholar
Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195–211.Google Scholar
Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 399–417.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D. M., Gedajlovic, E., & Erdener, C. (2003). The Chinese family firm as a multinational enterprise. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(2), 105–122.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. S., & Francia, R. S. (1972). An approximate analysis of variance test for normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(337), 215–216.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591–611.Google Scholar
Shaw, B., & Post, F. R. (1993). A moral basis for corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 745–751.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A. (2004). Does competition destroy ethical behavior? The American Economic Review, 94, 2414–2418.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105–116.Google Scholar
Su, J., & He, J. (2010). Does giving lead to getting? Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 73–90.Google Scholar
Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 325–342.Google Scholar
Toppinen, A., & Korhonen-Kurki, K. (2013). Global reporting initiative and social impact in managing corporate responsibility: A case study of three multinationals in the forest industry. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(2), 202–217.Google Scholar
Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of U.S. firms. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557.Google Scholar
Useem, M. (1988). Market and institutional factors in corporate contributions. California Management Review, 30(2), 77–88.Google Scholar
Vahlne, J. E., & Nordström, K. A. (1993). The internationalization process: Impact of competition and experience. The International Trade Journal, 7(5), 529–548.Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. P. (2004). Urban poverty, housing and social change in China. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Ucbasaran, D. (2001). The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 333–358.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (1995). Score diagnostics for linear models estimated by two stage least squares. In G. S. Maddala, P. C. B. Phillips, & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Advances in econometrics and quantitative economics: Essays in honor of Professor C. R. Rao (pp. 66–87). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Note: Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608–618.Google Scholar
Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. (2008). What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 59–82.Google Scholar
Yang, X., Jiang, Y., Kang, R., & Ke, Y. (2009). A comparative analysis of the internationalization of Chinese and Japanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 141–162.Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., & Zhu, J. (2009). Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Zhu, J., Yue, H., & Zhu, C. (2010). Corporate philanthropic giving, advertising intensity, and industry competition level. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
Zhou, W. (2013). Political connections and entrepreneurial investment: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 299–315.Google Scholar
Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Georgiadis, A. P., Carroll, C. E., & Siegel, D. S. (2012). Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1622–1627.Google Scholar